Jeong-Seon Ryu 1 , Jun Hyeok Lim 1 , Jeong Min Lee 1 , Woo Chul Kim 1 , Kyung-Hee Lee 1 , Azra Memon 1 , Seul-Ki Lee 1 , Bo-Rim Yi 1 , Hyun-Jung Kim 1 , Seung-Sik Hwang 1 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the frequency and investigate possible mechanisms and prognostic relevance of minimal (<10-mm thickness) pleural effusion in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single-center retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of the hospital, and informed consent was waived by the patients. A cohort of 360 consecutive patients diagnosed with SCLC by using histologic analysis was enrolled in this study. Based on the status of pleural effusion on chest computed tomographic (CT) scans at diagnosis, patients were classified into three groups: no pleural effusion, minimal pleural effusion, and malignant pleural effusion. Eighteen variables related to patient, environment, stage, and treatment were included in the final model as potential confounders. RESULTS: Minimal pleural effusion was present in 74 patients (20.6%) and malignant pleural effusion in 83 patients (23.0%). Median survival was significantly different in patients with no, minimal, or malignant pleural effusion (median survival, 11.2, 5.93, and 4.83 months, respectively; P < .001, log-rank test). In the fully adjusted final model, patients with minimal pleural effusion had a significantly increased risk of death compared with those with no pleural effusion (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.454 [95% confidence interval: 1.012, 2.090]; P = .001). The prognostic effect was significant in patients with stage I-III disease (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.751 [95% confidence interval: 1.586, 4.773]; P < .001), but it disappeared in stage IV disease. An indirect mechanism representing mediastinal lymphadenopathy was responsible for the accumulation in all but one patient with minimal pleural effusion. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal pleural effusion is a common clinical finding in staging SCLC. Its presence is associated with worse survival in patients and should be considered when CT scans are interpreted. © RSNA, 2015.
PURPOSE: To determine the frequency and investigate possible mechanisms and prognostic relevance of minimal (<10-mm thickness) pleural effusion in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single-center retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of the hospital, and informed consent was waived by the patients . A cohort of 360 consecutive patients diagnosed with SCLC by using histologic analysis was enrolled in this study. Based on the status of pleural effusion on chest computed tomographic (CT) scans at diagnosis, patients were classified into three groups: no pleural effusion , minimal pleural effusion , and malignant pleural effusion . Eighteen variables related to patient , environment, stage, and treatment were included in the final model as potential confounders. RESULTS: Minimal pleural effusion was present in 74 patients (20.6%) and malignant pleural effusion in 83 patients (23.0%). Median survival was significantly different in patients with no, minimal, or malignant pleural effusion (median survival, 11.2, 5.93, and 4.83 months, respectively; P < .001, log-rank test). In the fully adjusted final model, patients with minimal pleural effusion had a significantly increased risk of death compared with those with no pleural effusion (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.454 [95% confidence interval: 1.012, 2.090]; P = .001). The prognostic effect was significant in patients with stage I-III disease (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.751 [95% confidence interval: 1.586, 4.773]; P < .001), but it disappeared in stage IV disease. An indirect mechanism representing mediastinal lymphadenopathy was responsible for the accumulation in all but one patient with minimal pleural effusion . CONCLUSIONS: Minimal pleural effusion is a common clinical finding in staging SCLC . Its presence is associated with worse survival in patients and should be considered when CT scans are interpreted. © RSNA, 2015.
Entities: Disease
Gene
Species
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2015
PMID： 26323029 DOI： 10.1148/radiol.2015142388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiology ISSN： 0033-8419 Impact factor: 11.105