| Literature DB >> 34104846 |
Aleena Mary Cherian1, Shantikumar V Nair1, Vijayakumar Maniyal2, Deepthy Menon1.
Abstract
Coronary in-stent restenosis and late stent thrombosis are the two major inadequacies of vascular stents that limit its long-term efficacy. Although restenosis has been successfully inhibited through the use of the current clinical drug-eluting stent which releases antiproliferative drugs, problems of late-stent thrombosis remain a concern due to polymer hypersensitivity and delayed re-endothelialization. Thus, the field of coronary stenting demands devices having enhanced compatibility and effectiveness to endothelial cells. Nanotechnology allows for efficient modulation of surface roughness, chemistry, feature size, and drug/biologics loading, to attain the desired biological response. Hence, surface topographical modification at the nanoscale is a plausible strategy to improve stent performance by utilizing novel design schemes that incorporate nanofeatures via the use of nanostructures, particles, or fibers, with or without the use of drugs/biologics. The main intent of this review is to deliberate on the impact of nanotechnology approaches for stent design and development and the recent advancements in this field on vascular stent performance.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34104846 PMCID: PMC8172248 DOI: 10.1063/5.0037298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: APL Bioeng ISSN: 2473-2877
FIG. 1.Various nanoscale surface engineering strategies (nanostructured surface and thin films, nanoparticulate, and nanofibrous) adopted as coatings on coronary bare-metal stents to prevent in-stent restenosis and promote re-endothelialization.
FIG. 2.(a) Electron micrograph of titania nanotube coated stent. Inset: nanotubes with an average nanotube diameter of 90 nm (magnification ×250 000). Moffat trichrome-stained images of a stented artery. (b) Titania nanoengineered and (c) Ti stents, showing a 15.6% and 5.6% thinner neointima over the struts for TiO2 NT stents than Ti stent. Reprinted with permission from Nuhn et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(23), 19677–19686 (2017). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.
FIG. 3.(a) Electron micrograph of titania nanoleafy textured stent surface (magnification ×40 000). Fluorescence imaging of (b) endothelial cells stained for F-actin (red) and PECAM1 (green) and (c) smooth muscle cells stained for F-actin (red) and nucleus (blue) on nanotextured SS surfaces, showing preferential adsorption and proliferation of ECs over SMCs on nanoleafy SS surface. Reprinted with permission from Mohan et al., Adv. Healthcare Mater. 6, 1601353 (2017). Copyright 2017 John Wiley and Sons. H&E images of rabbit iliac artery after 2 months implantation of (d) SS bare-metal stent and (e) nanotextured SS stent, showing nearly 50% decrease in neointimal stenosis for the nanotextured stent. (f) Immunofluorescent en-face stained images of wheat germ agglutinin on ECs in nanotextured stent implanted artery, showing complete endothelialization (scale bar: 10 μm). (a) and (d)–(f) Reprinted with permission from Cherian et al., ACS Omega 5, 17582–17591 (2020). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
FIG. 4.(a) SEM images of (i) BMS and (ii) N–TiO2 film deposited on a bare stent. (b) Histopathological H&E staining and (c) optical coherence tomography of porcine coronary arteries implanted with (i) BMS, (ii) N–TiO2, (iii) N–TiO2 with everolimus, and (iv) EES for 4 weeks. The restenosis area was significantly decreased in the N–TiO2-everolimus group compared to that in the BMS group and was at par with the commercial EES. Reprinted with permission from Park et al., Mater. Sci. Eng.: C 91, 615–623 (2018). Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (BMS: bare-metal stent; N–TiO2: nitrogen-doped TiO2 film; EES: everolimus-eluting stent.)
Diverse nanostructures and thin-film coatings developed on stents which have been tested in various animal models.
| Type of surface on stents | Description | Development technique | Drug/biologics | Animal model | Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanotubular structures | Titanium dioxide nanotubes (Ti stent) | Anodization | ⋯ | Enhanced endothelialization and minimal in-stent restenosis |
| |
| Nanostructures | Titanium dioxide nanoleaves (SS stent) | TiO2 sputter deposition followed by hydrothermal | ⋯ | Reduction of neointima and complete endothelialization |
| |
| Nanoflaky MgF2 film (Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr stent) | Chemical conversion treatment | ⋯ | Complete endothelial lining with minimal thrombogenicity and restenosis |
| ||
| VSMC biomimetic patterns (SS stent) | Femtosecond laser processing | ⋯ | Rapid re-endothelialization in thirty days |
| ||
| Ta implanted nanoridges (CC stent) | Target-ion-induced plasma sputtering | ⋯ | Minimal neointimal hyperplasia and rapid re-endothelialization |
| ||
| Nanosized silicone filament (CC stent) | Anti-CD164 antibody | Improved selective EPC capture resulting in rapid endothelial healing in 1 week |
| |||
| Nanoporous alumina (SS stent) | Physical vapor deposition of aluminum followed by electrochemical conversion | Tacrolimus | Inhibited neointimal proliferation |
| ||
| Particle debris resulting from the cracking of ceramic coating during stent expansion resulted in increased neointimal growth and stenosis |
| |||||
| Nanoporous structures (SS stent) (Lepu Medical Technologies, China) | Electrochemical method to generate pores | Sirolimus and anti-CD34 antibody/anti-CD34 alone | Endothelialization in 2 weeks with minimal restenosis | |||
| CREG gene | Accelerated endothelium in 4 weeks |
| ||||
| Rapamycin and probucol | As safe as BMS and SES without any significant enhancement in re-endothelialization |
| ||||
| Nano-thin-film coatings | Titanium nitride coating (SS stent) | Reactive physical vapor deposition | ⋯ | Reduced neointimal hyperplasia |
| |
| Ti–O film (CC stent) | Magnetron sputter deposition | ⋯ | Faster rate of endothelialization |
| ||
| Titanium nano-thin-film coating (SS stent) | Sol-gel processing | ⋯ | Non-inferior to BMS |
| ||
| Copper-doped TiO2 nanofilms (Ti wire) | Sol-gel spin-coating | ⋯ | Reduced neointimal hyperplasia and re-endothelialization in 4 weeks |
| ||
| TiO2 thin films (CC stent) | Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition | Heparin | Reduced neointima, inflammation and fibrin deposition |
| ||
| Abciximab/alpha lipoic acid | Effective reduction of in-stent restenosis and accelerated re-endothelialization |
| ||||
| Abciximab and Kruppel-like factor 4 gene | Reduced neointimal thickening and faster endothelialization |
| ||||
| Nitrogen-doped TiO2 thin films | Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition | Tacrolimus | Reduced in-stent restenosis and increased endothelial formation |
| ||
| Everolimus | Decreased neointimal thickening and thrombosis with faster healing |
| ||||
| Nanothin TiO2 film (SS stent) | Radio frequency magnetron sputtering | REDV peptide | Reduced in-stent restenosis and promoted re-endothelialization |
| ||
| Nanothin DLC (CC stent) | Physical vapor deposition | ⋯ | Early and complete endothelial healing in 30 days and decreased neointimal proliferation at 180 days |
| ||
| Nanothin DLC (NiTi stent) | Physical vapor deposition | ⋯ | Significantly lower neointimal hyperplasia |
| ||
| Nanothin polyzene F coating (CC stent) | Deposited from a solution and subsequently dried | ⋯ | Rapid healing in 1 week |
| ||
| Complete endothelial coverage and reduced neointimal hyperplasia and inflammation |
FIG. 5.(a) Bare-metal stent with a nanofibrous membrane coating. (b) SEM micrographs of the electrospun nanofibrous membrane with ticagrelor. Magnification of ×3000. (c) SEM images of platelets on electrospun ticagrelor eluting membrane. Red arrow indicates activated platelets (scale bars = 10 μm). Magnification 3000×. (d) Hematoxylin–eosin stained section of arterial lesions in ticagrelor group exhibiting a complete lining of endothelial cells (red arrows). (e) Pathological arterial lesions in the ticagrelor group stained using HES5 markers at 4 weeks following stent implantation. The amount of formed neointima suggests less proliferation of SMCs in the media. (f) SEM images of the stented vessel showing complete endothelial coverage in the ticagrelor group. Reprinted with permission from Lee et al., Int. J. Nanomed. 13, 6039–6048 (2018). Copyright 2018 Dove Medical Press.
Bare-metal stents coated with electrospun nanofibers tested in vivo.
| Type of coating | Description | Active agent | Animal model | Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrospun nanofibrous coatings | PCL and human serum albumin | Paclitaxel | Induced weaker neointimal growth over 6 months |
| |
| PLGA nanofibers on BMS | Propylthiouracil | Reduced neointimal hyperplasia and enhanced re-endothelialization |
| ||
| PLGA nanofibers on BMS | Ticagrelor | Minimal neointimal formation and favored endothelial recovery |
| ||
| PLGA nanofibers on SS stents | Acetylsalicylic acid | Promoted re-endothelialization |
| ||
| PLGA nanofibers on BMS | Vildagliptin | Accelerated endothelial recovery and decreased SMC hyperplasia |
| ||
| poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) cable tie type stents | Rapamycin | Reduced neointimal hyperplasia |
|
FIG. 6.SEM images of (a) heparin/NONOate nanoparticles immobilized on polyglycidyl methacrylate (PGMA)-coated SS stents. Strut coverage on (b) SS-PGMA-Hep/NONOates and (c) control 316L SS stents harvested at 1 month. Histological hematoxylin−eosin stained images of (d) SS-PGMA-Hep/NONOates and (e) 316L SS stent after implantation for 1 month (arrows point to the higher magnification images). Reprinted with permission from Zhu et al., Langmuir 36, 2901–2910 (2020). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Different types of nanoparticulate coatings developed on stents for treating in-stent restenosis, tested in vivo.
| Type of material | Description | Active agent | Animal model | Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanoparticle coatings | PLGA/chitosan NPs | FITC | Specific uptake of the NPs by SMCs. Extent of neointima and re-endothelialization were comparable for BMS and NP-eluting stents |
| |
| Imatinib mesylate | Marked reduction (by 50%) of in-stent neointima formation and stenosis without any effect on re-endothelialization |
| |||
| Pitavastatin | Significantly reduced in-stent stenosis with elicited endothelial healing effects |
| |||
| Phospholipid NPs | Sirolimus | Larger lumen area with reduced neointimal thickness and stenosis, with completely covered stent struts after 28 days |
| ||
| Akt1 siRNA NPs | Akt1 siRNA | Reduced smooth muscle cell hyperplasia and thereby in-stent restenosis |
| ||
| Bi-layered PLGA NPs | VEGF and paclitaxel | Promoted early endothelium healing and inhibited smooth muscle cell proliferation |
| ||
| Chitosan/PLGA NPs | miR-126 dsRNA | Inhibited the progression of neointimal hyperplasia |
| ||
| NPs entrapped in polyacrylic acid functionalized CNTs and fibrin hydrogel | Vegf and Ang1 | Significantly enhanced endothelial regeneration and inhibited neointimal proliferation |
| ||
| Hep/NONOate NP | Heparin and NONOate | Atherosclerotic rabbit model | Promoted re-endothelialization with subsequent reduction in in-stent restenosis |
| |
| Nanocomposite coatings | Amorphous calcium phosphate NPs with PLLA | ⋯ | Reduced long-term chronic inflammatory response for up to 24 months |
| |
| PLGA/ACP nanocomposites | ⋯ | Reduced restenosis with faster rates of re-endothelialization and lower inflammation |
| ||
| PLLA/ACP nanoscaffolds | ⋯ | Larger lumen area and luminal patency rates with reduced late lumen loss and accelerated repair of endothelium | |||
| PLLA/ACP nanocomposites | Paclitaxel | Significant reduction of in-stent restenosis, inflammation and stent recoil at 1month and showed minimal restenosis and complete re-endothelialization at 6 months | |||
| Sirolimus | Long term inhibition of neointimal proliferation |
| |||
| Nano-Cu- metallic organic frameworks | ⋯ | Excellent anti-coagulation, re-endothelialization and anti-hyperplasia properties |
| ||
| Mesoporous silica NPs/CNT | ⋯ | Early stage endothelialization |
| ||
| Silver NPs decorated TiO2 NT | ⋯ | Suppressed inflammation, excessive SMC proliferation and tissue hyperplasia |
|
FIG. 7.Representative SEM images of clinically tested porous stents. (a-i) Microporous hydroxyapatite-coated stent filled with sirolimus formulation (a-ii) cross section of the nanothin hydroxyapatite coating (∼600 nm). Reprinted with permission from Costa et al., JACC: Cardiovasc. Interventions 2(5), 422–427 (2008). Copyright 2008, Elsevier. (b-i) Nano+TM polymer-free stent showing strut microstructure after expansion. Strut thickness is approximately 91 μm having a large number of sirolimus-filled pores (∼400 nm) on the abluminal stent surface. (b-ii) Electron microscopy images of the nanopores (magnification ×20 000). Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., Catheterization Cardiovasc. Interventions 95(S1), 658–664 (2020). Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.
Stents with surface modification at the nanoscale in clinical trials.
| Stent | Clinical trial | Clinical endpoints | Result | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Titan (Hexacath, France) titanium nitride oxide coating | TITAX AMI | MACE (16.4% vs 25.1%) and 5-year rates of cardiac death (1.9% vs 5.7%), recurrent MI (8.4% vs 18.0%) and rate of definite ST (0.9% vs 7.1%) were significantly lower in patients with TiNOx stent compared to Paclitaxel eluting stent (PES). | Better clinical outcome of TiNOx stent vs PES in patients with acute myocardial infarction |
|
| BASE ACS | At 5-year follow-up, TiNOx stent was non-inferior to everolimus eluting stent (EES) for primary endpoint of MACE (14.4% vs 17.8%). The rate of non-fatal MI was lower in TiNOx stent group (5.9% vs 9.7%) and the rates of cardiac death (2.8% vs 3.8%) and ischemia-driven TLR (8.3% vs 9.9%) were comparable for both groups. | Better clinical outcome and non-inferiority of TiNOx stent vs EES in patients with acute myocardial infarction |
| |
| TIDES-ACS | TiNOx stents were associated with lower rates of cardiac death (0.6% vs. 2.6%) and MI (2.2% vs. 5.0%) than everolimus eluting stent (EES) at 18 months of follow-up. | TiNOx-coated stents were non-inferior to platinum–chromium–based biodegradable polymer EES at 12 months |
| |
| MOMO (Japan Stent Technology) Diamond-like carbon coating | Multi-center, non-randomized clinical trial | No myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or cardiac death were observed in patients with MOMO stent. Binary restenosis was 12.5% (n = 5), and the LLL was 0.54 ± 0.3 mm. | Safety and feasibility of MOMO cobalt–chromium carbon-coated stent |
|
| No in-stent thrombosis or myocardial infarction was observed in patients with MOMO stent. The binary restenosis rate at the 6-month was 10.5 % for MOMO stent, which is lower than commercially available bare-metal stents (BMS). | Non-inferiority over commercial BMS |
| ||
| SiC-coated stent | Tenax-vs Nir-stent Study | MACE occurred in 12% of Tenax recipients and 14.3% of Nir recipients. Premature target lesion revascularization was performed in 6.9% patients in Tenax group and 5.1% patients in Nir group. | Both SiC-coated (Tenax) and non-coated (Nir) stents had low rate of MACE, with no definite superiority of any of the devices. |
|
| Target lesion revascularization was performed in 2% of Tenax group and 1.6% of Nir group and subacute thrombosis was observed in 0.8% of Tenax patients. | No advantage of the SiC-coated stent over stainless steel stent with regard to clinical and angiographic restenosis rates |
| ||
| SiO2 coated stent | First-in-man trial | Angiographic in-stent LLL was 0.77 ± 0.44 mm, and binary restenosis occurred in 33.3% of lesions. At 12 months, cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization rate was 33.3%. | In contrast with the preclinical study, the SiO2 coated stent did not efficiently suppress neointimal hyperplasia in humans in this trial. |
|
| COBRA Pz-F stent (Celenova Biosciences Inc.) Nanothin Polyzene-F coating | One-year follow-up | Target vessel failure (composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization) rate was 12%. There were no cases of definite stent thrombosis. | The COBRA PzF stent was safe and effective and was associated with excellent clinical outcomes. |
|
| VESTAsync drug eluting stent (MIV Therapeutics Inc.) Nanothin-microporous hydroxyapatite surface coating | VESTASYNC I trial | In-stent LL and percentage neointimal hyperplasia were 0.3 ± 0.25 mm and 2.6% ± 2.2%, respectively, with a nonsignificant increase at 9 months (0.36 ± 0.23 mm and 4.0% ± 2.2%, respectively). There were no MACE at 1 year follow-up. | VESTAsync-eluting stent was effective in reducing LL and neointimal hyperplasia at 4 and 9 months. | |
| Nano+ (Lepu Medical Technology) Nanoporous polymer-free SS stent eluting sirolimus | Nanotrial | Nano+ was non-inferior to durable-polymer DES (SES) at primary endpoint of 9 months. The incidence of MACE in the Nano+ group (7.6%) was comparable to SES group (5.9%) at 2 years follow-up. The frequency of cardiac death (0.8% vs. 0.7%) and stent thrombosis (0.8% vs. 1.5%,) was low for both Nano+ and SES. | Nano+ showed similar safety and efficacy compared with SES in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. |
|
| The 1-year Target Lesion Failure rate was 3.1% with clinically driven TLR rates (1.3%), cardiac death (1.8%) and MI (0.4%). ST occurred in 0.4% of patients. | The 1-year clinical outcomes for Nano+ polymer-free SES implantation were excellent |
| ||
| BICARE (Lepu Medical Technology) Nanoporous polymer-free SS stent eluting dual drugs sirolimus and probucol | First-in-human trial | At 4 months, angiographic in-stent late loss was 0.14 ± 0.19 mm, and the in-stent binary restenosis rate was 3.1% and complete strut coverage was 98.2%. At 18 months, TLF occurred in 9.4% patients with no adverse safety events. | The preliminary feasibility and safety of polymer-free, dual- drug eluting stent, without any adverse safety events and favorable suppression of neointimal hyperplasia. |
|