Literature DB >> 34103806

The use of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery as an additional approach to upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: Our Experience.

Marco Serafino Grande1, Davide Campobasso1, Raffaele Inzillo1, Matteo Moretti1, Francesco Facchini1, Jean Emmanuel Kwe1, Antonio Frattini1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With increasing experience and advancing technology, endoscopy for UTUC has become more common. Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) could be an option for patients with low-grade and large-volume UTUC that could be either anatomically or technically challenging to manage by retrograde flexible ureterorenoscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this video, we describe, step by step, our ECIRS technique as applied to two selected clinical cases of UTUC.
CONCLUSION: ECIRS could represent a useful approach to UTUC in selected cases. The advantage of the "endovision" puncture and dilation technique is in the avoidance of entering the renal calyx at the level of the tumor. In addition, the combined approach, compared to the purely percutaneous approach, allows access to, and treatment of, neoplasms located in all renal calyces. Copyright:
© 2021 Indian Journal of Urology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34103806      PMCID: PMC8173945          DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_71_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Urol        ISSN: 0970-1591


INTRODUCTION

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is uncommon and accounts for only 5%–10% of all urothelial carcinomas (UC).[1] Traditionally, radical nephroureterectomy was considered the standard of care for UTUC. With increasing experience and advancing technology, endoscopy for UTUC has become more common.[2] The antegrade percutaneous endoscopic approach is usually reserved for patients with low-grade and large-volume UTUC that could be either anatomically or technically challenging to manage by retrograde flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS), especially tumors located in the lower pole.[3] The main risks of the percutaneous procedure compared to a purely endoscopic approach include tumor seeding along the percutaneous tract, rarely described,[4] and colonic perforations, that are reported to occur in 0.3%–0.5% of percutaneous punctures.[5] In this scenario, endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) could be an additional therapeutic strategy for UTUC in selected cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this video, we describe, step by step, our technique as applied to two selected clinical cases. In both cases, the patients had a solitary kidney and underwent a diagnostic retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with cold cup biopsy. The pathological report described a low-grade UTUC in both cases.

Video available online at www.indianjurol.com

In the first clinical case, we describe a bilateral synchronous disease treated with left nephroureterectomy and right endourological management. In the right kidney, an adjuvant topical treatment with one-shot intrarenal mitomycin C (through a retrograde ureteral catheter) and a subsequent induction cycle with bacillus Calmette–Guerin, instilled at full dose as a 6-week course through a percutaneous nephrostomy tube, was administrated. During follow-up, we observed that right nephroureterectomy and radical cystectomy was performed at another urological center after 6 years. In the second clinical case, we describe our endoscopic approach in a patient affected by low-grade UTUC of >2 cm size in a solitary kidney with a concomitant suspicious solid/cystic mass (4 cm) of the upper renal pole. After ECIRS, we performed an endoscopic second look with targeted biopsies (under pathological examination) to confirm the absence of recurrence after 1 month with no apparent tumor relapses. The patient is awaiting adjuvant topical chemotherapy and a subsequent follow-up RIRS at 3 months. Moreover, cryoablation of the renal mass will be performed for the patient in a dedicated urology unit at a later date. Video available online at www.indianjurol.com

CONCLUSIONS

ECIRS could represent a useful approach to UTUC in selected cases. The advantage of the “endovision” puncture and dilation technique is in the avoidance of entering the renal calyx at the level of the tumor. In addition, the combined approach, compared to the purely percutaneous approach, allows access to, and treatment of, neoplasms located in all renal calyces.[6]
  5 in total

Review 1.  Ureteroscopic and percutaneous management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): systematic review.

Authors:  Mark L Cutress; Grant D Stewart; Paimaun Zakikhani; Simon Phipps; Ben G Thomas; David A Tolley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Tumor Seeding along Percutaneous Nephrostomy Track: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ivan Schwartzmann; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Antonino Saccà; Angelo Territo; Francesca Pisano; Serena Maruccia; Alberto Breda; Joan Palou
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Shahrokh F Shariat; Seth P Lerner; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Michael Rink; Wassim Kassouf; Philippe E Spiess; Yair Lotan; Dingwei Ye; Mario I Fernández; Eiji Kikuchi; Daher C Chade; Marko Babjuk; Arthur P Grollman; George N Thalmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Treatment of Colonic Injury During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Hakan Öztürk
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

Review 5.  Optimal Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Zhenbang Liu; Teck Wei Tan; Yee Mun Lee; Eu Kiang Yeo; Yew-Lam Chong
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.147

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.