| Literature DB >> 34102010 |
Zhe Xue1,2, Kai Zhao1,2, Zhenghui Sun1,2, Chen Wu1,2, Bowen Yu1,2, Dongsheng Kong1,2, Bainan Xu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Isorhapontigenin (ISO) has been shown to have antioxidant activity. This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant effects of ISO on cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury and its possible molecular mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: HO-1; Nrf2; PKCε; cerebral ischemia; isorhapontigenin; oxidative stress; reperfusion
Year: 2021 PMID: 34102010 PMCID: PMC8323036 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Behav Impact factor: 2.708
FIGURE 1ISO protected the brain from I/R damage. (a) The chemical structure of ISO. (b) Neurological deficit score. (c) Cerebral infarction in rat brain. (d) Percentage of infarct volume in the brain. (e) Nissl staining to assess rat neuronal damage. (f) H&E staining to assess rat neuronal damage. (g) PKCε and phosphorylated PKCε levels in the brain. Scale bar =100 μm (×200 times). n = 6. ## p < .01 versus the sham group; *p < .05 and **p < .01 versus the I/R group
FIGURE 2ISO reduced oxidative damage. (a) ROS levels. (b) 4‐HNE content. (c) 8‐OHdG content. n = 6. ## p < .01 versus the sham group; *p < .05 and **p < .01 versus the I/R group
FIGURE 4Cell viability determined. n = 6. ## p < .01 versus the sham group; *p < .05 and **p < .01 versus the OGD/R group
FIGURE 3Protein expression levels of Nrf2 (a) and HO‐1 (b). n = 6. ** p < .01 versus the sham group
FIGURE 5ISO’s effects on protein expression of Nrf2 (a) and HO‐1 (b) in SH‐SY5Y cells. n = 6. * p < .05 and **p < .01 versus the OGD/R group
FIGURE 6ISO produced neuroprotection via the Nrf2/HO‐1 signaling pathway. (a, b) Protein expression levels of HO‐1 and Nrf2. n = 6. ## p < .01 versus the control group. && p < .01 versus the 80 μM+ si‐Con group. (C, D) Cell viability. n = 6. ## p < .01 versus the control group; ** p < .01 versus the OGD/R group; & p < .05 versus the 80 μM group
FIGURE 7PKCε knockdown eliminated ISO‐induced neuroprotection. (a) PKCε and phosphorylated PKCε (p‐PKCε) levels, (b) Nrf2 expression, and (c) HO‐1 expression under different treatment conditions. n = 6. ## p < .01 versus the control group; & p < .05, && p < .01 versus the 80 μM + si‐Con group. (d) PKCε knockdown abolished ISO‐induced neuroprotection against OGD/R injury. n = 6. ## p < .01 versus the control group; ** p < .01 versus the OGD/R group; & p < .05 versus the 80 μM group