Literature DB >> 34101836

Report of AAPM Task Group 155: Megavoltage photon beam dosimetry in small fields and non-equilibrium conditions.

Indra J Das1, Paolo Francescon2, Jean M Moran3, Anders Ahnesjö4, Maria M Aspradakis5, Chee-Wai Cheng6, George X Ding7, John D Fenwick8, M Saiful Huq9, Mark Oldham10, Chester S Reft11, Otto A Sauer12.   

Abstract

Small-field dosimetry used in advance treatment technologies poses challenges due to loss of lateral charged particle equilibrium (LCPE), occlusion of the primary photon source, and the limited choice of suitable radiation detectors. These challenges greatly influence dosimetric accuracy. Many high-profile radiation incidents have demonstrated a poor understanding of appropriate methodology for small-field dosimetry. These incidents are a cause for concern because the use of small fields in various specialized radiation treatment techniques continues to grow rapidly. Reference and relative dosimetry in small and composite fields are the subject of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) dosimetry code of practice that has been published as TRS-483 and an AAPM summary publication (IAEA TRS 483; Dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy: An IAEA/AAPM International Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination, Technical Report Series No. 483; Palmans et al., Med Phys 45(11):e1123, 2018). The charge of AAPM task group 155 (TG-155) is to summarize current knowledge on small-field dosimetry and to provide recommendations of best practices for relative dose determination in small megavoltage photon beams. An overview of the issue of LCPE and the changes in photon beam perturbations with decreasing field size is provided. Recommendations are included on appropriate detector systems and measurement methodologies. Existing published data on dosimetric parameters in small photon fields (e.g., percentage depth dose, tissue phantom ratio/tissue maximum ratio, off-axis ratios, and field output factors) together with the necessary perturbation corrections for various detectors are reviewed. A discussion on errors and an uncertainty analysis in measurements is provided. The design of beam models in treatment planning systems to simulate small fields necessitates special attention on the influence of the primary beam source and collimating devices in the computation of energy fluence and dose. The general requirements for fluence and dose calculation engines suitable for modeling dose in small fields are reviewed. Implementations in commercial treatment planning systems vary widely, and the aims of this report are to provide insight for the medical physicist and guidance to developers of beams models for radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Keywords:  detector correction factors; non-equilibrium dosimetry; photon dose modeling; relative dosimetry; small field; treatment modalities

Year:  2021        PMID: 34101836     DOI: 10.1002/mp.15030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Replacing gamma knife beam-profiles on film with point-detector scans.

Authors:  Benedikt Rudek; Kenneth Bernstein; Sunshine Osterman; Tanxia Qu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Small-field dosimetry with detector-specific output correction factor for single-isocenter stereotactic radiotherapy of single and multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  Tomohiro Ono; Kohei Kawata; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Megumi Uto; Takashi Mizowaki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-10-22

3.  Selection Strategy of Jaw Tracking in VMAT Planning for Lung SBRT.

Authors:  Wuji Sun; Yinghua Shi; Yu Li; Chao Ge; Xu Yang; Wenming Xia; Kunzhi Chen; Libo Wang; Lihua Dong; Huidong Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH.

Authors:  Paige A Taylor; Jean M Moran; David A Jaffray; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-Megavoltage photon and electron beams.

Authors:  Mark W Geurts; Dustin J Jacqmin; Lindsay E Jones; Stephen F Kry; Dimitris N Mihailidis; Jared D Ohrt; Timothy Ritter; Jennifer B Smilowitz; Nicholai E Wingreen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.243

6.  Monte Carlo modeling of the Elekta Versa HD and patient dose calculation with EGSnrc/BEAMnrc.

Authors:  Holly M Parenica Paschal; Christopher N Kabat; Pavlos Papaconstadopoulos; Neil A Kirby; Pamela A Myers; Timothy D Wagner; Sotirios Stathakis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.243

7.  Potential dose variability for small-field plans delivered with Elekta Agility collimators.

Authors:  Joseph J Foy; Poonam Yadav; Indra J Das
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.