Raquel Almansa1,2,3, Ana P Tedim1,2, Amanda de la Fuente1,2, Jose María Eiros4,2, David J Kelvin5,6, Antoni Torres3,7, Jesus F Bermejo-Martin1,3. 1. Group for Biomedical Research in Sepsis, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Gerencia Regional de Salud, Paseo de San Vicente, 37007 Salamanca, Spain. 2. Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Gerencia Regional de Salud, Valladolid, Spain. 3. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. 4. Microbiology Service, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Gerencia Regional de Salud, Valladolid, Spain. 5. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. 6. Laboratory of Immunity, Shantou University Medical College, Jinping, Shantou, Guangdong, China. 7. Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universidad de Barcelona, Institut D investigacions August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.
We thank Luke Chen and Tien Quach for their interest on our Comment. We could not agree more with the title of their reply letter, combining immunomodulators and antivirals for COVID-19, which is consistent with the conclusion of our Comment: “the available evidence would support combined strategies to simultaneously control viral replication and deleterious inflammation, based on specific indicators or biomarkers of both pathophysiological processes”. Our conclusion already proposed using biological indicators to guide anti-inflammatory and antiviral therapies in COVID-19, which converges with the so-called threshold concept of pathological immune activation raised by Chen and Quach. Our Comment is not to diminish the role of immunopathology or that of immunomodulators in this disease. Our intention was to balance the participation of the virus and that of inflammation in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19, stressing the direct association between those signatures of increased viral replication and those of increased inflammation, immunosuppression, endothelial dysfunction, coagulation activation, and tissue damage, which support the role of uncontrolled viral replication as a major driver of severe disease. We agree with Chen and Quach that the two phases (viral replication and inflammation) model has actually become quite obsolete. However, the effect of this model in research and social networks has been, and still is, very important—eg, one of the founding articles proposing this model has received 464 citations and 2171 tweets in less than 1 year.Our Comment highlighted the necessity of developing effective antivirals for this disease. As outlined by Chen and Quach with their example of Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus infections, the future of COVID-19 treatment is likely to involve administering effective antivirals combined with anti-inflammatory or even immune-stimulatory therapies in those patients with biomarker signatures predicting successful response to each one of these approaches. We strongly advocate a personalised medicine approach for COVID-19 disease, as we have proposed for sepsis. Alternative antivirals to those already tested in multidomain clinical trials (such as remdesivir or ritonavir–lopinavir) could be helpful to prevent progression from mild to severe disease or to improve outcome of patients with COVID-19 once severe disease is already evident. New trials should be implemented to test this notion. Additionally, combined therapies with immunomodulators and antivirals could have much to say in preventing complications of COVID-19 in the long-term.JFB-M, RA, APT, JME, AT, and DJK have a patent pending (EP20383140.9). AT reports grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III. DJK reports grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Research Nova Scotia, Atlantic Genome/Genome Canada, Li-Ka Shing Foundation, and Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation. AdlF declares no competing interests.
Authors: Jesús F Bermejo-Martin; David Andaluz-Ojeda; Raquel Almansa; Francisco Gandía; Jose Ignacio Gómez-Herreras; Esther Gomez-Sanchez; María Heredia-Rodríguez; Jose Maria Eiros; David J Kelvin; Eduardo Tamayo Journal: J Infect Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 6.072
Authors: Jesus F Bermejo-Martin; Raquel Almansa; Ana P Tedim; Amanda de la Fuente; Jose María Eiros; Antoni Torres; David J Kelvin Journal: Lancet Microbe Date: 2021-04-15
Authors: Kenneth E Remy; Scott C Brakenridge; Bruno Francois; Thomas Daix; Clifford S Deutschman; Guillaume Monneret; Robin Jeannet; Pierre-Francois Laterre; Richard S Hotchkiss; Lyle L Moldawer Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Kris M White; Romel Rosales; Soner Yildiz; Thomas Kehrer; Lisa Miorin; Elena Moreno; Sonia Jangra; Melissa B Uccellini; Raveen Rathnasinghe; Lynda Coughlan; Carles Martinez-Romero; Jyoti Batra; Ajda Rojc; Mehdi Bouhaddou; Jacqueline M Fabius; Kirsten Obernier; Marion Dejosez; María José Guillén; Alejandro Losada; Pablo Avilés; Michael Schotsaert; Thomas Zwaka; Marco Vignuzzi; Kevan M Shokat; Nevan J Krogan; Adolfo García-Sastre Journal: Science Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 47.728