Literature DB >> 34099978

Characterization of Bacterial and Fungal Infections in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Factors Associated With Health Care-Associated Infections.

Christine J Kubin1,2, Thomas H McConville2, Donald Dietz2, Jason Zucker2, Michael May2, Brian Nelson1, Elizabeth Istorico2, Logan Bartram2, Jennifer Small-Saunders2, Magdalena E Sobieszczyk2, Angela Gomez-Simmonds2, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at increased risk of health care-associated infections (HAIs), especially with prolonged hospital stays. We sought to identify incidence, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and outcomes associated with bacterial/fungal secondary infections in a large cohort of patients with COVID-19.
METHODS: We evaluated adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 2 March and 31 May 2020 and hospitalized >24 hours. Data extracted from medical records included diagnoses, vital signs, laboratory results, microbiological data, and antibiotic use. Microbiologically confirmed bacterial and fungal pathogens from clinical cultures were evaluated to characterize community- and health care-associated infections, including describing temporal changes in predominant organisms on presentation and throughout hospitalization. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate risk factors for HAIs.
RESULTS: A total of 3028 patients were included and accounted for 899 positive clinical cultures. Overall, 516 (17%) patients with positive cultures met criteria for infection. Community-associated coinfections were identified in 183 (6%) patients, whereas HAIs occurred in 350 (12%) patients. Fifty-seven percent of HAIs were caused by gram-negative bacteria and 19% by fungi. Antibiotic resistance increased with longer hospital stays, with incremental increases in the proportion of vancomycin resistance among enterococci and ceftriaxone and carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales. Intensive care unit stay, invasive mechanical ventilation, and steroids were associated with HAIs.
CONCLUSIONS: HAIs occur in a small proportion of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and are most often caused by gram-negative and fungal pathogens. Antibiotic resistance is more prevalent with prolonged hospital stays. Antimicrobial stewardship is imperative in this population to minimize unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; bacterial infections; health care–associated infection

Year:  2021        PMID: 34099978      PMCID: PMC8135866          DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis        ISSN: 2328-8957            Impact factor:   3.835


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been accompanied by the widespread use of empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents attributed to liberalization of antibiotic stewardship approaches in a time of clinical uncertainty and significant strain on health care systems [1, 2]. Development of bacterial or fungal superinfections are well-established risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with influenza pneumonia [3], such as intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality, and have also been reported in patients with respiratory syndromes due to other coronaviruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome [4-7]. However, the incidence and identity of bacteria and fungi causing secondary infections in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain unclear. In early reports from China, secondary infections were identified in up to 50% of patients who died from COVID-19, compared to only 15% of patients who did not [8]. However, the proportion of patients receiving empiric antibiotics has been shown to greatly exceed those with culture-proven infections. In a recent retrospective review of published studies (n = 806 patients), bacterial and fungal coinfections were reported in only 8% of patients, whereas >70% of patients received empiric antibacterial therapy [2]. Similarly, in a large meta-analysis of nearly 4000 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, predominantly from China, only 7% were found to have bacterial coinfections, which increased to 14% in critically ill patients [9]. Little is known about the characteristics of secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 [10]. Many published studies fail to adequately describe the timing of identified infections, making it difficult to distinguish between community-associated coinfection or health care–associated infection (HAI). In addition, few prior studies describe causative organisms and antibiotic susceptibilities, and follow-up time is often limited. The impact of immunomodulatory agents, such as corticosteroids and interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor blockers, on the incidence of secondary infections is unknown, despite the widespread use of these agents to manage inflammatory complications of COVID-19 [11, 12]. Here we aimed to systematically characterize community- and health care–associated bacterial and fungal infections in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, including temporal changes in predominant organisms on presentation and throughout the hospital course. We further investigated clinical risk factors for HAIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Setting and Study Design

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a quaternary medical center in New York City, which includes a large academic medical center and a small community hospital, both located in northern Manhattan. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older, presented to the emergency department between 2 March 2020 and 31 May 2020, tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction from a nasopharyngeal swab sample, and were hospitalized >24 hours. We extracted clinical and demographic information from the patients’ electronic medical records. This included admission diagnoses, vital signs, laboratory results, microbiological data, antibiotic use data, and discharge dates. International Classification of Diseases (Ninth or Tenth Revision) codes were used to identify comorbidities for calculating the Charlson Comorbidity Index Score. During the study period, patients with COVID-19 were managed according to internal guidelines, which underwent several updates during the study period to reflect the rapid evolution of available evidence and experience. Initially, this included the use of hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin in patients with severe disease. Additionally, patients with evidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome or other inflammatory complications were considered for receipt of low-dose methylprednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours) and/or the IL-6 receptor blocker tocilizumab. Patients meeting respective criteria were approached for enrollment in randomized clinical trials studying sarilumab (an alternative IL-6 receptor blocker), remdesivir, or convalescent plasma.

Patient Consent Statement

The Columbia University institutional review board approved this study and waived the need for informed consent.

Microbiological Data and Definitions of Infection

Culture and susceptibility results from all body sources were extracted from patients’ electronic medical records. Only bacterial and fungal organisms were considered. For each unique organism, only the first isolate collected at a given body site per patient was included in the analysis. Surveillance cultures from nares and rectal swabs and autopsy cultures were excluded. Community-associated coinfections were defined as those in which the positive culture was isolated in the first 72 hours of hospitalization or within 5 days prior to admission from an outpatient or emergency department visit. HAIs, in which the positive culture was obtained after hospital day 3, were further subdivided into infections detected on days 4–14, 15–28, or after hospital day 28. Bacteremia was defined by a positive blood culture for any organism other than coagulase-negative staphylococci. Criteria for bacteremia due to coagulase-negative staphylococci included positive blood cultures for at least 2 consecutive days and receipt of an anti-staphylococcal antibiotic; if these criteria were not met, the blood culture was regarded as contaminated. All respiratory isolates except Candida and Enterococcus species were considered to indicate the presence of pneumonia, as protocols at our institution recommend culturing only in the setting of worsening symptoms or fever. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was defined by organism isolation from a respiratory source >2 calendar days after intubation. Organisms isolated from urinary cultures were challenging to evaluate for infection, given the difficulty of assessing symptoms in this critically ill patient population. All urinary isolates with an associated urinalysis with >10 white blood cells per high-power field were considered to constitute a urinary tract infection (UTI). All drug susceptibilities were interpreted according to criteria outlined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. To categorize drug susceptibilities and identify multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms, we applied the following definitions: Staphylococcus aureus was considered methicillin resistant (MRSA) if the isolate was resistant to oxacillin; Enterococcus species resistant to vancomycin were categorized as vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE); MDR Enterobacterales were defined by resistance to ceftriaxone (Ceph-R) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates were identified by a meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≥2 µg/mL; and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were defined by a meropenem MIC of ≥4 µg/mL.

Statistical Analysis

Specific clinical parameters were described either as proportions or using the median and interquartile range (IQR), as appropriate. In univariable analyses, potential predictors of any infection vs no infection were compared between groups using the Fisher exact test or χ 2 for categorial variables, or unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Continuous variables were tested for normality utilizing the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. We also assessed risk factors for development of HAI in adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression analyses. Variables that had a P value of < .1 in unadjusted analyses were included in multivariable logistic regression models assessing independent predictors of HAI. Candidate variables were removed from the full model if coefficient P values were nonsignificant and removal improved model fit, which was assessed by comparing pseudo R2 values. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York).

RESULTS

A total of 3028 adult patients confirmed to have COVID-19 were admitted for >24 hours during the study period. Among these, 899 positive clinical cultures were identified in 516 patients. Thus, 516 (17%) patients with positive cultures met criteria for infection. The characteristics of patients with COVID-19 with or without secondary infections are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.

Patient Characteristics With and Without Any Identified Infection in Patients Presenting to the Hospital With Coronavirus Disease 2019

CharacteristicaTotal (N = 3028)No Infection (n = 2512)Infection (n = 516) P Value
Age, y, median (IQR)64 (50–76)64 (48–76)67 (57–75)<.001
Male sex1623 (54)1333 (53)290 (56).210
BMI, kg/m2, median (IQR)27.8 (24.2–32.6)28.0 (24.4–32.7)27.0 (23.4–32.3).027
Comorbidities
 Hypertension1788 (59)1462 (58)326 (63).041
 Diabetes mellitus1165 (39)937 (37)228 (44).004
 Chronic kidney disease429 (14)349 (14)80 (16).375
 Liver disease166 (6)132 (5)34 (7).268
 Asthma400 (13)337 (13)63 (12).506
 COPD228 (8)169 (7)59 (11)<.001
 HIV96 (3)83 (3)13 (3).430
 Solid organ transplant100 (3)80 (3)20 (4).506
Days from symptom onset to hospital admission, median (IQR)6 (3–9)6 (3–10)5 (3–8).004
Initial oxygen requirement<.001
 None (room air)1927 (64)1681 (67)246 (48)
 Nasal cannula588 (19)110 (21)478 (19)
 Non-rebreather mask449 (15)321 (13)128 (25)
 Noninvasive ventilation8 (0.3)4 (0.2)4 (1)
 Invasive mechanical ventilation56 (2)28 (1)28 (5)
Initial COVID-19 admission length of hospital stay, d, median (IQR)6 (3–11)6 (3–9)16 (7–41)<.001
Highest level of care<.001
 Intensive care unit622 (21)318 (13)304 (59)
 General floor2279 (75)2070 (82)209 (41)
 Admitted and discharged from ED location127 (4)124 (5)3 (1)
Invasive mechanical ventilation500 (17)221 (9)279 (54)<.001
Laboratory values on hospital presentation, median (IQR)
 C-reactive protein, mg/L114.0 (54.1–198.8) n = 2511108.9 (49.4–187.8) n = 2024146.9 (76.8–249.2) n = 487<.001
 ESR, mm/h70 (48–97) n = 235869 (47–95) n = 188475 (51–101) n = 474.002
 Ferritin, ng/mL672 (326–1256) n = 2480653 (316–1209) n = 1998781 (375–1549) n = 482<.001
 Procalcitonin, ng/mL0.24 (0.11–0.62) n = 25030.21 (0.11–0.56) n = 20150.35 (0.16–1.07) n = 488<.001
 D-dimer, μg/mL1.5 (0.8–3.3) n = 22651.4 (0.8–3.1) n = 18062.1 (1.0–4.7) n = 459<.001
 Interleukin 6, pg/mL21.0 (7.3–49.9) n = 194617.4 (6.0–41.5) n = 152137.9 (14.2–92.5) n = 425<.001
 Lactate dehydrogenase, U/L403 (294–564) n = 2480391 (286–537) n = 1999455 (341–679) n = 481<.001
 Serum creatinine, mg/dL1.05 (0.79–1.63) n = 28521.04 (0.78–1.58) n = 23391.17 (0.83–1.90) n = 513<.001
 WBC count, cells × 109/L7.5 (5.6–10.3) n = 29147.3 (5.5–9.8) n = 24018.6 (5.9–12.6) n = 513<.001
 Neutrophils, %77 (68–84) n = 266076 (67–83) n = 216281 (73–86) n = 498<.001
Maximum laboratory values during hospitalization, median (IQR)
 C-reactive protein, mg/L161.4 (77.0–271.3) n = 2511144.7 (66.8–237.5) n = 2024274.7 (146.7–300.0) n = 487<.001
 ESR, mm/h88 (60–117) n = 235782 (57–111) n = 1883111 (82–130) n = 474<.001
 Ferritin, ng/mL876 (392–1810) n = 2480806 (371–1545) n = 19981403 (607–2909) n = 482<.001
 Procalcitonin, ng/mL0.38 (0.14–1.72) n = 25030.30 (0.12–1.09) n = 20151.78 (0.49–8.93) n = 488<.001
 D-dimer, μg/mL2.5 (1.0–9.5) n = 22651.8 (0.9–5.2) n = 18069.8 (3.1–20.0) n = 459<.001
 Interleukin 6, pg/mL30.8 (10.0–94.2) n = 194623.5 (8.0–61.0) n = 1521117.9 (37.4–157.5) n = 425<.001
 Lactate dehydrogenase, U/L462 (331–675) n = 2480435 (317–613) n = 1999632 (421–925) n = 481<.001
 Serum creatinine, mg/dL1.26 (0.89–2.51) n = 28521.16 (0.85–2.08) n = 23392.29 (1.24–5.35) n = 513<.001
 WBC count, cells × 109/L10.8 (7.5–16.1) n = 29149.8 (7.1–13.8) n = 240119.2 (13.2–26.2) n = 513<.001
 Neutrophils, %82 (73–88) n = 266080 (72–87) n = 216287 (81–91) n = 498<.001
COVID-19–specific therapy received
 Hydroxychloroquine1427 (47)1112 (44)315 (61)<.001
 Remdesivir78 (3)53 (2)25 (5).001
 Tocilizumab166 (6)97 (4)69 (13)<.001
 Steroids707 (23)477 (19)230 (47)<.001
Antibiotics received (any time)
 Any antibiotic2015 (67)1518 (60)497 (96)<.001
 Anti-MRSA agentsb858 (28)490 (20)368 (71)<.001
 Broad spectrum anti-Pseudomonas agentsc1141 (38)721 (29)420 (81)<.001
Hospital mortality647 (21)479 (19)168 (33)<.001

Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ED, emergency department; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IQR, interquartile range; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; WBC, white blood cell.

aAll medians for continuous variables compared between groups using Mann-Whitney U test.

bAnti-MRSA agents: vancomycin (intravenous), linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline.

cBroad-spectrum anti-Pseudomonas agents: aminoglycosides, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, aztreonam, levofloxacin, polymyxin B.

Patient Characteristics With and Without Any Identified Infection in Patients Presenting to the Hospital With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ED, emergency department; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IQR, interquartile range; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; WBC, white blood cell. aAll medians for continuous variables compared between groups using Mann-Whitney U test. bAnti-MRSA agents: vancomycin (intravenous), linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline. cBroad-spectrum anti-Pseudomonas agents: aminoglycosides, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, aztreonam, levofloxacin, polymyxin B.

Community-Associated Coinfections

A total of 221 cultures from 183 patients (6%) were identified as coinfections within 72 hours of hospital admission. The majority were isolated from urine (112/221 [51%]), followed by blood (69/221 [31%]) and respiratory tract (26/221 [12%]). Fourteen isolates (6%) were identified from other sources, including 3 each from peritoneal fluid and wounds. The most common organisms identified were Escherichia coli (68/221 [31%]), S. aureus (25/221 [11%]), Proteus mirabilis (18/221 [8%]), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (17/221 [8%]). Escherichia coli accounted for 58 of 112 (52%) isolates from the urinary tract, whereas S. aureus was most frequently isolated from the respiratory tract (13/26 [50%]). Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli each accounted for 9 of 69 (13%) cases of community-associated bacteremias.

Health Care-Associated Infections

Health care–associated infections were identified in 350 (12%) patients, with the median onset of infection on hospital day 16 (IQR, 9–25). Among the 678 isolates identified as health care-associated, 385 (57%) were gram-negative bacteria, 167 (25%) gram-positive bacteria, and 126 (19%) fungi. The frequency of organisms and time of isolation are described in Table 2.
Table 2.

Description of Blood, Respiratory, and Urine Isolates by Organism Group, Hospital Day Onset After Admission, and Resistance Profile

Source/Organism GroupCommunity-AcquiredHospital Day 4–14Hospital Day 15–28Hospital Day >28Total
Blood isolates, No. (%)
 Total No.69294757202
  Enterobacterales22 (32)4 (14)11 (23)19 (33)56 (28)
   Ceftriaxone-resistant5/222/45/1111/1923/56
   Carbapenem-resistant0004/194/56
  Staphylococcus species12 (17)10 (35)11 (23)7 (12)40 (20)
   Methicillin-resistant1/121/102/112/76/40
  Candida species1 (1)6 (21)10 (21)12 (21)29 (14)
   Fluconazole-resistant0001/121/29
  Streptococcus species16 (23)5 (17)1 (2)2 (4)24 (12)
  Enterococcus species4 (6)3 (10)5 (11)9 (16)21 (10)
   Vancomycin-resistant1/42/32/52/97/21
  Miscellaneous gram-positives10 (15)0 (0)1 (2)1 (2)12 (6)
  Pseudomonas species1 (1)0 (0)5 (11)4 (7)10 (5)
  Acinetobacter species0 (0)0 (0)2 (4)1 (2)3 (2)
  Gram-positive anaerobes1 (1)0 (0)1 (2)1 (2)3 (2)
  Yeast, not otherwise specified0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (2)1 (1)
  Gram-negative anaerobes1 (1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)
  Burkholderia species0 (0)1 (3)0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)
  Miscellaneous gram-negatives1 (1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)
Respiratory isolates, No. (%)
 Total No.269911485324
  Enterobacterales3 (12)40 (40)59 (52)40 (47)142 (44)
   Ceftriaxone-resistant1/318/4031/5922/4072/142
   Carbapenem-resistant01/403/5910/4014/142
  Staphylococcus species13 (50)35 (35)22 (19)11 (13)81 (25)
   Methicillin-resistant5/1310/3511/223/1129/81
  Pseudomonas species6 (23)9 (9)23 (20)27 (32)65 (20)
  Stenotrophomonas species0 (0)5 (5)4 (4)2 (2)11 (3)
  Aspergillus species1 (4)2 (2)1 (1)1 (1)5 (2)
  Streptococcus species1 (4)4 (4)0 (0)0 (0)5 (2)
  Acinetobacter species1 (4)2 (2)1 (1)1 (1)5 (2)
  Miscellaneous gram-positives0 (0)2 (2)1 (1)2 (2)5 (2)
  Miscellaneous gram-negatives1 (4)0 (0)1 (1)1 (1)3 (1)
  Scedosporium species0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)0 (0)1 (0.3)
  Burkholderia species0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)0 (0)1 (0.3)
Urine isolates, No. (%)
 Total No.112617184328
  Enterobacterales86 (77)18 (30)25 (35)48 (57)177 (54)
   Ceftriaxone-resistant23/864/1811/2520/4858/177
   Carbapenem-resistant1/860/181/255/487/177
  Candida species6 (5)33 (54)34 (48)17 (20)90 (27)
   Fluconazole-resistantNANANANANA
  Enterococcus species9 (8)6 (10)2 (3)9 (11)26 (8)
   Vancomycin-resistant2/91/61/25/99/26
  Pseudomonas species4 (4)2 (3)8 (11)7 (8)21 (6)
  Staphylococcus species4 (4)1 (2)1 (1)0 (0)6 (2)
   Methicillin-resistant00000
  Yeast, not otherwise specified0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)3 (4)4 (1)
  Streptococcus species1 (1)1 (2)0 (0)0 (0)2 (0.6)
  Miscellaneous gram-positives1 (1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (0.3)
  Burkholderia species1 (1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (0.3)

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

Description of Blood, Respiratory, and Urine Isolates by Organism Group, Hospital Day Onset After Admission, and Resistance Profile Abbreviation: NA, not applicable. A total of 94 patients with COVID-19 accounted for 133 organisms isolated from blood cultures. The median time from hospital admission to first health care–associated bacteremia was 23 days (IQR, 15–37 days). Gram-positive organisms accounted for 42% of bacteremias, followed by gram-negative organisms (35%) and fungi (22%). All but 1 fungal pathogens isolated from blood cultures were Candida species. Overall, Enterobacterales was the most common organism group isolated from blood cultures (26%). However, bacteremias caused by staphylococci and streptococci were more frequent earlier in the hospital stay (Figure 1). They accounted for 15 of 29 (52%) bacteremias occurring within the first 14 days, compared to 12 of 47 (26%) occurring during hospital days 15–28 and 9 of 57 (16%) beyond hospital day 28. Enterobacterales were the most common cause of bacteremias occurring beyond hospital day 28 (19/57 [33%]).
Figure 1.

Proportion of organism group by source over the duration of hospital days. Abbreviation: CAI, community-associated infection.

Proportion of organism group by source over the duration of hospital days. Abbreviation: CAI, community-associated infection. There were 207 patients with 298 health care–associated respiratory isolates identified during the study period. Respiratory isolates were classified as hospital acquired in 17% and ventilator associated in 83%. Enterobacterales, staphylococci, and Pseudomonas species were the most common organism groups and accounted for 89% of respiratory pathogens (Table 2). Staphylococci were more commonly (35%) isolated early (within the first 14 days). Beyond day 14 of hospitalization, Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas species predominated, comprising 75% of respiratory isolates. Urine isolates accounted for 216 health care–associated isolates, and consisted predominantly of Enterobacterales and enterococci (81%). An additional 31 isolates were identified from sites other than the blood, respiratory tract, or urine, including 17 (55%) from unspecified wound cultures. The majority of these isolates were collected beyond hospital day 28 (65%).

Antibiotic Use and Resistance

Among the entire cohort of 3028 patients, 2015 (67%) had exposure to at least 1 dose of an antibiotic. This includes 2512 patients without a microbiologically confirmed bacterial or fungal infection, of whom 1518 (60%) had any antibiotic exposure. Among those with HAIs, 340 (97%) had exposure to antibiotics. The most commonly used antibiotics prior to infection in patients who went on to develop an HAI included broad-spectrum penicillins (65%), cephalosporins (59%), anti-staphylococcal agents with activity against MRSA (56%), and tetracyclines (26%). Exposure to carbapenems (15%) and quinolones (5%) was less common. Drug susceptibilities differed by source of infection and duration of hospitalization, with the proportion of VRE, Ceph-R Enterobacterales, and CRE infections increasing with duration of hospitalization (Figure 2). MRSA was identified in 38 of 116 (33%) S. aureus isolates, all but 9 of which were isolated from the respiratory tract (76%). VRE accounted for 18 of 50 (36%) enterococci. Seven VRE bacteremias and 9 VRE urine isolates were identified, including 3 causing community-acquired infections. Cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales was the most common organism group with multidrug resistance, identified in 159 isolates. Ceph-R Enterobacterales accounted for a larger proportion of infections occurring on hospital days 15–28 (49%) and after hospital day 28 (50%), compared to community-acquired infections (27%) and infections on hospital days 4–14 (41%). Moreover, while the urine was the most common source of Ceph-R Enterobacterales community–associated infections (23/31 [74%]), the respiratory tract was the most common source of infection thereafter (71/128 [55%]). We identified 27 CRE isolates, most of which occurred after day 28 of hospitalization (78%) and were isolated from the respiratory tract (52%) [13]. Four bacteremias caused by CRE were identified and all 4 occurred after day 28 of hospitalization. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species were infrequent, and also consisted largely of respiratory tract infections occurring beyond day 14 of hospitalization.
Figure 2.

Frequency of resistant pathogens over hospital length of stay. Abbreviation: CAI, community-associated infection.

Frequency of resistant pathogens over hospital length of stay. Abbreviation: CAI, community-associated infection.

Risk Factors for Health Care-Associated Infection

Patients with HAI were significantly older and more likely to be male. These patients were also more likely to require ICU care, require invasive mechanical ventilation, receive COVID-19–specific therapies, and have more exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics prior to infection (Table 3). In a multivariable model, requiring ICU care (odds ratio [OR], 4.140 [95% {CI}, 2.534–6.764]; P < .001), requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (OR, 6.044 [95% CI, 3.667–9.961]; P < .001), or receiving steroids (OR, 1.910 [95% CI, 1.419–2.571]; P < .001) was independently associated with development of an HAI. A post hoc sensitivity analysis logistic regression was performed focusing only on health care–associated bacteremia and respiratory infections as the dependent variable. The same variables (ICU care, invasive mechanical ventilation, and steroids) plus male sex and not receiving an anti-MRSA antibiotic were independently associated with HAI (Supplementary Table 1).
Table 3.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Analysis for Health Care–Associated Infection

CharacteristicUnadjusted OR (95% CI) P ValueAdjusted OR (95% CI) P Value
Age, y1.006 (1.000–1.012).0491.008 (.998–1.017).109
Male sex1.436 (1.143–1.805).0020.982 (.741–1.301).897
BMI, kg/m2, each unit1.000 (.999–1.000).553
Comorbidities
 Hypertension1.237 (.982–1.558).0711.204 (.888–1.634).232
 Diabetes mellitus1.174 (.936–1.473).165
 Chronic kidney disease0.974 (.705–1.347).874
 Liver disease1.093 (.682–1.752).713
 Asthma0.791 (.557–1.124).191
 COPD1.364 (.925–2.011).117
 HIV0.774 (.386–1.553).471
 Solid organ transplant1.145 (.632–2.076).654
Days from symptom onset to hospital admission, each day0.981 (.961–1.001).060
Initial oxygen requirement, each unit1.723 (1.547–1.918)<.001
  Nasal cannula (1 vs 0)1.016 (.767–1.345).914
 Non-rebreather mask (2 vs 0)2.723 (2.096–3.537)<.0010.909 (.645–1.283).588
 Noninvasive ventilation (3 vs 0)7.529 (1.874–30.241).0042.610 (.523–13.016).242
 Invasive mechanical ventilation (4 vs 0)4.881 (2.759–8.633)<.0010.690 (.365–1.303).252
ICU level of care19.771 (15.147–25.806)<.0014.140 (2.534–6.764)<.001
Invasive mechanical ventilation prior to HAI17.521 (13.570–22.621)<.0016.044 (3.667–9.961)<.001
Laboratory values on hospital presentation, each unit
 C-reactive protein, mg/L1.004 (1.003–1.005)<.001
 ESR, mm/h1.005 (1.001–1.008)<.001
 Ferritin, ng/mL1.000 (1.000–1.000).038
 Procalcitonin, ng/mL1.002 (.996–1.007).541
 D-dimer, μg/mL1.001 (.997–1.006).622
 Interleukin 6, pg/mL1.010 (1.008–1.012)<.001
 Lactate dehydrogenase, U/L1.001 (1.001–1.001)<.001
 Serum creatinine, mg/dL1.027 (.981–1.076).250
 WBC count, cells × 109/L1.019 (1.004–1.035).015
 Neutrophils, %1.035 (1.023–1.047)<.001
COVID-19–specific therapy received
 Hydroxychloroquine0.330 (.259, .421)<.0011.142 (.840–1.553).398
 Remdesivir3.266 (1.981–5.386)<.0011.198 (.633–2.266).579
 Tocilizumab5.722 (4.092–8.003)<.0011.305 (.854–1.996).219
 Steroids5.014 (3.977–6.321)<.0011.910 (1.419–2.571)<.001
Antibiotics received prior to HAI
 Any antibiotic3.482 (2.566–4.723)<.001
 Anti-MRSA agentsa4.842 (3.843–6.102)<.0010.745 (.491–1.132).168
 Broad-spectrum anti-Pseudomonas agentsb5.271 (4.135–6.720)<.0011.162 (.754–1.793).496

Patients who died within 3 days of admission were excluded (n = 2959).

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HAI, health care–associated infection; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ICU, intensive care unit; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; OR, odds ratio; WBC, white blood cell.

aAnti-MRSA agents: vancomycin (intravenous), linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline.

bBroad-spectrum anti-Pseudomonas agents: aminoglycosides, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, aztreonam, levofloxacin, polymyxin B.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Analysis for Health Care–Associated Infection Patients who died within 3 days of admission were excluded (n = 2959). Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HAI, health care–associated infection; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ICU, intensive care unit; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; OR, odds ratio; WBC, white blood cell. aAnti-MRSA agents: vancomycin (intravenous), linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline. bBroad-spectrum anti-Pseudomonas agents: aminoglycosides, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, aztreonam, levofloxacin, polymyxin B.

DISCUSSION

Among this large cohort of COVID-19 patients, we detected notable temporal changes in the frequency of infection types and antimicrobial resistance patterns from the time of hospitalization to >28 days after admission. Only 6% presented with a community-associated bacterial or fungal coinfection, consisting largely of gram-negative UTIs. Microbiologically confirmed HAIs occurred in 12% of the patients over the course of the hospital stay. Gram-negative organisms accounted for 58% of all infections and increased in frequency with longer hospital stay, while staphylococci accounted for the majority of gram-positive organisms (57%). We also detected a relatively large proportion of fungal infections (15%), consisting primarily of hospital-associated Candida species. Importantly, the proportion of resistant isolates increased with duration of hospital stay, particularly with incremental increases in the proportion of vancomycin resistance among enterococci and ceftriaxone resistance and carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales. Previous studies have reported variable rates of both community- and hospital-associated secondary infections in adult patients of 0–17% and 0–43%, respectively [14-34]. Differences in the patient population, culture sources, and pathogens of interest are likely responsible for the wide variations reported. The 2 largest studies assessing for coinfection at the time of hospital admission reported incidence between 1% and 3% but included detection of viral respiratory pathogens and Mycoplasma [28, 32]. Among studies reporting the proportion of patients with hospital-associated infections, disease severity and follow-up time also varied. For example, 2 studies of ICU patients reported notably different secondary infections rates, with 1 study reporting that 37% of patients developed secondary bacteremia and the other study detecting hospital-associated bacterial or fungal infection in 14% of patients [17, 19]. Similarly, a review of patients over the age of 60 in which 54% were still hospitalized at day 28 reported 43% of patients developing secondary infection; however, the characteristics of these infections were not described [27]. While a relatively large proportion of patients in this study developed secondary infections (17%), we and others found that this was greatly exceeded by the proportion of patients receiving antibiotics, which reached 90% in some studies [33, 34]. In previous studies, antimicrobials were initiated upon initial presentation, despite the relatively low rates of bacterial coinfections reported. Our study documented antibiotic exposure at any point during the hospitalization in 60% of patients. High rates of antimicrobial use in conjunction with other risk factors, such as prolonged hospital and ICU stays, invasive devices, and the need for patient cohorting, may have contributed to the increasing incidence of MDR infections over the course of hospitalizations. MRSA was infrequent among S. aureus isolates within the first 14 days of hospitalization. Similarly, VRE was not common in the initial 14 days with both MRSA and VRE increasing to >40% beyond 14 days. This suggests that broad-spectrum gram-positive agents may not be necessary early on in the hospital course and therefore are potential targets for antimicrobial stewardship programs. Among gram-negative organisms, Ceph-R Enterobacterales were common urinary isolates early and likely reflect extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing organisms present in the community. Of concern is the isolation of CRE among Enterobacterales at 4.2% during hospital days 15–28 and 19% beyond day 28. Population structure and mechanisms of resistance among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in COVID-19 patients were previously reported from our institution [13]. The current study provides more clinical context on the true incidence of these pathogens over time. Two previous studies identified CRE [19, 29]. In the larger study, CRE was identified in 5% of respiratory and bloodstream isolates; however, the median length of stay was 13 days (IQR, 6–21 days) and only 28% of patients were still admitted at the time of analysis [29]. We found that Candida species accounted for 17% of all HAIs and consisted predominantly (72%) of UTIs. Increased use of antibiotics out of proportion to the number of microbiologically confirmed infections may have contributed to colonization and infection caused by Candida species in this population and deserves further exploration. However, while previous studies have raised concerns about fungal infections in patients with COVID-19 [18, 28, 29], the incidence remains low compared to other hospitalized patient populations [35]. Moreover, we likely overreported Candida species isolated from the urinary tract as we were unable to evaluate for symptomatic infections or the presence of urinary catheters. In this cohort, identification of Aspergillus species was highly uncommon, occurring in only 4 respiratory cultures. This number is much lower than recent reports identifying Aspergillus infections in up to 19% of COVID-19 ICU patients [36]. Predictors of HAIs identified were largely consistent with known risk factors for infections in hospitalized patients. We further identified a significant association between the use of steroids and development of an HAI. Although this association persisted after adjusting for other factors such as need for ICU admission and invasive mechanical ventilation, this finding may reflect use of immunomodulatory agents in patients with more severe COVID-19 or with prolonged hospitalizations. The scope of this study did not allow us to assess steroid dose or duration or the frequency of other opportunistic infections. Tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor blocker, has been associated with increased risk of serious infections compared to other immunomodulatory agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [37]. In a study from Italy evaluating patients with COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab, 13% of patients in the treatment arm developed infections, compared to 4% who received standard of care without tocilizumab [38]. In the United States, superinfections were significantly higher in patients treated with tocilizumab (54%) than in controls (26%) [39]. We did not find tocilizumab to be independently associated with HAIs. The strengths of this study include evaluation of both community-associated and health care–associated secondary infections, extended duration of follow-up, inclusion of all hospitalized patients, and evaluation for antimicrobial resistance. However, the study also has several limitations. Given the rapid influx of patients, ICU units were not clearly delineated and as such ICU admission was likely underreported. UTIs with pyuria were not evaluated in the context of urinary symptoms. Cultures were usually obtained in the setting of fever or presumed sepsis. While we may be overestimating pneumonias in ventilated patients, positive respiratory cultures were difficult to ignore in this setting and were clinically considered ventilator-associated pneumonias requiring treatment. While it is standard practice to obtain cultures prior to the initiation of antibiotics or before changing antibiotics, the appropriateness of this timing was not evaluated and could result in underreporting of infection rates. While more infections occurred in patients who received steroids, an extensive risk factor analysis in these patients was not completed as it was not the goal of this analysis. Antibiotic use was common, but we did not evaluate antibiotic duration or its relationship to the development of antibiotic resistance. We also could not determine the impact of efforts to limit health care worker patient exposure with the frequency of obtaining appropriate cultures. Finally, New York City was an early hot spot in the United States and the rapid influx of patients strained the health care system. As such, the generalizability of these results may be limited outside of a pandemic environment and each institution’s susceptibility patterns may differ, but they provide insight into the likelihood of bacterial and fungal infections and the need for broad-spectrum antibiotic use.

CONCLUSIONS

In our quaternary care hospital in New York City, 17% of patients with COVID-19 developed secondary bacterial or fungal infections during the peak of the pandemic. HAIs were not common, but the overwhelming majority were caused by gram-negative pathogens. Ceftriaxone-resistant and, more concerningly, carbapenem-resistant gram-negative organisms were increasingly isolated in patients with prolonged hospital stays. After adjusting for other factors, invasive mechanical ventilation, ICU care, and use of steroids were independent predictors of HAIs in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Antimicrobial stewardship principles are of utmost importance early and throughout the hospitalization in these patients, and antimicrobials must be limited to suspected or confirmed bacterial infections. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the long-term consequences of steroid use, our antimicrobial decision-making, and ways to optimize antimicrobial use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author. Click here for additional data file.
  36 in total

1.  Risk of serious infections in tocilizumab versus other biologic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multidatabase cohort study.

Authors:  Ajinkya Pawar; Rishi J Desai; Daniel H Solomon; Adrian J Santiago Ortiz; Sara Gale; Min Bao; Khaled Sarsour; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Seoyoung C Kim
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Critically Ill Patients With the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yaseen M Arabi; Awad Al-Omari; Yasser Mandourah; Fahad Al-Hameed; Anees A Sindi; Basem Alraddadi; Sarah Shalhoub; Abdullah Almotairi; Kasim Al Khatib; Ahmed Abdulmomen; Ismael Qushmaq; Ahmed Mady; Othman Solaiman; Abdulsalam M Al-Aithan; Rajaa Al-Raddadi; Ahmed Ragab; Ghaleb A Al Mekhlafi; Abdulrahman Al Harthy; Ayman Kharaba; Mashael Al Ahmadi; Musharaf Sadat; Hanan Al Mutairi; Eman Al Qasim; Jesna Jose; Maliha Nasim; Abdulaziz Al-Dawood; Laura Merson; Robert Fowler; Frederick G Hayden; Hanan H Balkhy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Giovanni Guaraldi; Marianna Meschiari; Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri; Jovana Milic; Roberto Tonelli; Marianna Menozzi; Erica Franceschini; Gianluca Cuomo; Gabriella Orlando; Vanni Borghi; Antonella Santoro; Margherita Di Gaetano; Cinzia Puzzolante; Federica Carli; Andrea Bedini; Luca Corradi; Riccardo Fantini; Ivana Castaniere; Luca Tabbì; Massimo Girardis; Sara Tedeschi; Maddalena Giannella; Michele Bartoletti; Renato Pascale; Giovanni Dolci; Lucio Brugioni; Antonello Pietrangelo; Andrea Cossarizza; Federico Pea; Enrico Clini; Carlo Salvarani; Marco Massari; Pier Luigi Viale; Cristina Mussini
Journal:  Lancet Rheumatol       Date:  2020-06-24

4.  COVID-19 in a designated infectious diseases hospital outside Hubei Province, China.

Authors:  Qingxian Cai; Deliang Huang; Pengcheng Ou; Hong Yu; Zhibin Zhu; Zhang Xia; Yinan Su; Zhenghua Ma; Yiming Zhang; Zhiwei Li; Qing He; Lei Liu; Yang Fu; Jun Chen
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 13.146

5.  Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaomin Wu; Xiaoyan Chen; Yanping Cai; Jia'an Xia; Xing Zhou; Sha Xu; Hanping Huang; Li Zhang; Xia Zhou; Chunling Du; Yuye Zhang; Juan Song; Sijiao Wang; Yencheng Chao; Zeyong Yang; Jie Xu; Xin Zhou; Dechang Chen; Weining Xiong; Lei Xu; Feng Zhou; Jinjun Jiang; Chunxue Bai; Junhua Zheng; Yuanlin Song
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Nanshan Chen; Min Zhou; Xuan Dong; Jieming Qu; Fengyun Gong; Yang Han; Yang Qiu; Jingli Wang; Ying Liu; Yuan Wei; Jia'an Xia; Ting Yu; Xinxin Zhang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  COVID-19 with Different Severities: A Multicenter Study of Clinical Features.

Authors:  Yun Feng; Yun Ling; Tao Bai; Yusang Xie; Jie Huang; Jian Li; Weining Xiong; Dexiang Yang; Rong Chen; Fangying Lu; Yunfei Lu; Xuhui Liu; Yuqing Chen; Xin Li; Yong Li; Hanssa Dwarka Summah; Huihuang Lin; Jiayang Yan; Min Zhou; Hongzhou Lu; Jieming Qu
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Bacterial and fungal coinfections in COVID-19 patients hospitalized during the New York City pandemic surge.

Authors:  Priya Nori; Kelsie Cowman; Victor Chen; Rachel Bartash; Wendy Szymczak; Theresa Madaline; Chitra Punjabi Katiyar; Ruchika Jain; Margaret Aldrich; Gregory Weston; Philip Gialanella; Marilou Corpuz; Inessa Gendlina; Yi Guo
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Abdullah Assiri; Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Abdullah A Al-Rabeeah; Fahad A Al-Rabiah; Sami Al-Hajjar; Ali Al-Barrak; Hesham Flemban; Wafa N Al-Nassir; Hanan H Balkhy; Rafat F Al-Hakeem; Hatem Q Makhdoom; Alimuddin I Zumla; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 25.071

10.  Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales causing secondary infections during the COVID-19 crisis at a New York City hospital.

Authors:  Angela Gomez-Simmonds; Medini K Annavajhala; Thomas H McConville; Donald E Dietz; Sherif M Shoucri; Justin C Laracy; Felix D Rozenberg; Brian Nelson; William G Greendyke; E Yoko Furuya; Susan Whittier; Anne-Catrin Uhlemann
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  37 in total

1.  Mucormycosis of the Breast in a Patient With Breast Carcinoma After COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Authors:  S P Somashekhar; Richa Jaiswal; Rohit Kumar; B C Ashok; Susmita Rakshit; Amit Rauthan; H K Karthik; Archa Prasad; Herra Islam; Aaron Fernandes; Elroy Saldahana; K R Ashwin
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  Rhinocerebral Mucormycosis in a COVID-19 Patient from Nepal: A Case Report.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar Gupta; Pallawi Jyotsana; Avilasha Singh; Diwakar Phuyal; Parbej Allam
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 0.556

3.  Bacterial Pneumonia and Respiratory Culture Utilization among Hospitalized Patients with and without COVID-19 in a New York City Hospital.

Authors:  Maxwell D Weidmann; Gregory J Berry; Jason E Zucker; Simian Huang; Magdalena E Sobieszczyk; Daniel A Green
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 11.677

Review 4.  Opportunistic Infections in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nithin Kurra; Priyanka Isaac Woodard; Nikhila Gandrakota; Heli Gandhi; Srinivasa Rao Polisetty; Song Peng Ang; Kinjalben P Patel; Vishwaj Chitimalla; Mirza M Ali Baig; Gayathri Samudrala
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 5.  Bilateral Renal Mucor Mycosis Presenting as Anuria in a Covid 19 Recovered Patient: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Surya Prakash Vaddi; Seshu Mohan Khetavath; Dilip M Babu; Nagarjuna Maturu; Krithika Mohan; Datta Prasad M; Jawahar B; Rajesh Reddy Krv
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Surgical & medical management of ROCM (Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis) epidemic in COVID-19 era and its outcomes - a tertiary care center experience.

Authors:  Kapil Soni; Aparna Das; Vidhu Sharma; Amit Goyal; Bikram Choudhury; Ankita Chugh; Deepak Kumar; Taruna Yadav; Vidhi Jain; Ashwini Agarwal; Mayank Garg; Kavita Bhatnagar; Poonam Elhence; Pradeep Kumar Bhatia; Mahendra Kumar Garg; Sanjeev Misra
Journal:  J Mycol Med       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 3.746

7.  What about the others: differential diagnosis of COVID-19 in a German emergency department.

Authors:  David Fistera; Annalena Härtl; Dirk Pabst; Randi Manegold; Carola Holzner; Christian Taube; Sebastian Dolff; Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt; Lale Umutlu; Clemens Kill; Joachim Risse
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Presumed Urinary Tract Infection in Patients Admitted with COVID-19: Are We Treating Too Much?

Authors:  Johan Van Laethem; Stephanie C M Wuyts; Jan Pierreux; Lucie Seyler; Gil Verschelden; Thibault Depondt; Annelies Meuwissen; Patrick Lacor; Denis Piérard; Sabine D Allard
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06

9.  Emerging cases of mucormycosis under COVID-19 pandemic in India: Misuse of antibiotics.

Authors:  Gaurav Gupta; Roshan S; Yogendra Singh; Lakshmi Thangavelu; Sachin Kumar Singh; Harish Dureja; Dinesh Kumar Chellappan; Kamal Dua
Journal:  Drug Dev Res       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.004

10.  Management outcomes of mucormycosis in COVID-19 patients: A preliminary report from a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Abha Kumari; Nusumu Purnachandra Rao; Uma Patnaik; Virender Malik; Manvir Singh Tevatia; Shivali Thakur; Jijesh Jaydevan; Pavitra Saxena
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.