Literature DB >> 34099833

Introduction and reproducibility of an updated practical grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis based on high-resolution MR imaging.

Elisabeth Sartoretti1,2, Michael Wyss3, Alex Alfieri4, Christoph A Binkert1, Cyril Erne2, Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer5, Thomas Sartoretti1,2,6.   

Abstract

In this paper we sought to develop and assess the reproducibility of an updated 6-point grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis based on the widely used Lee classification that more accurately describes lumbar foraminal stenosis as seen on high-resolution MRI. Grade A indicates absence of foraminal stenosis. Grades B, C, D and E indicate presence of foraminal stenosis with contact of the nerve root with surrounding anatomical structures (on one, two, three or four sides for B, C, D and E respectively) yet without morphological change of the nerve root. To each grade, a number code indicating the location of contact between the nerve root and surrounding anatomical structure(s) is appended. 1, 2, 3 and 4 indicate contact of the nerve root at superior, posterior, inferior and anterior position of the borders of the lumbar foramen. Grade F indicates presence of foraminal stenosis with morphological change of the nerve root. Three readers graded the lumbar foramina of 101 consecutive patients using high-resolution T2w (and T1w) MR images with a spatial resolution of beyond 0.5 mm3. Interreader agreement was excellent (Cohen's Kappa = 0.866-1). Importantly, 30.6%/31.6%/32.2% (reader 1/reader 2/ reader 3) of foramina were assigned grades that did not appear in the original Lee grading system (grades B and D). The readers found no foramen that could not be described accurately with the updated grading system. Thus, an updated 6-point grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis is reproducible and comprehensively describes lumbar foraminal stenosis as seen on high-resolution MRI.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34099833     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91462-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  16 in total

1.  Clinical correlation of a new MR imaging method for assessing lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  H-J Park; S S Kim; S-Y Lee; N-H Park; M-H Rho; H-P Hong; H-J Kwag; S-H Kook; S-H Choi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Seunghun Lee; Joon Woo Lee; Jin Sup Yeom; Ki-Jeong Kim; Hyun-Jib Kim; Soo Kyo Chung; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  David F Fardon; Alan L Williams; Edward J Dohring; F Reed Murtagh; Stephen L Gabriel Rothman; Gordon K Sze
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Accelerated MRI of the Lumbar Spine Using Compressed Sensing: Quality and Efficiency.

Authors:  Grischa Bratke; Robert Rau; Kilian Weiss; Christoph Kabbasch; Krishnan Sircar; John N Morelli; Thorsten Persigehl; David Maintz; Daniel Giese; Stefan Haneder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography.

Authors:  S Wildermuth; M Zanetti; S Duewell; M R Schmid; B Romanowski; A Benini; T Böni; J Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The Haleem-Botchu classification: a novel CT-based classification for lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  S Haleem; M Malik; V Guduri; C Azzopardi; S James; R Botchu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Extraspinal findings prevalence and clinical significance in 4250 lumbar spine MRI exams.

Authors:  Ruba A Khasawneh; Ziyad Mohaidat; Firas A Khasawneh; Ahmad Farah; Maha Gharaibeh; Mwaffaq El-Heis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Redundant nerve roots in lumbar spinal stenosis: inter- and intra-rater reliability of an MRI-based classification.

Authors:  Luca Papavero; Carlos J Marques; Jens Lohmann; Thies Fitting; Kathrin Schawjinski; Nawar Ali; Hauke Hillebrand; Rainer Maas
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Diurnal T2-changes of the intervertebral discs of the entire spine and the influence of weightlifting.

Authors:  Thorsten Jentzsch; Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Philipp Mächler; Jan Farei-Campagna; Armando Hoch; Andrea B Rosskopf; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Interobserver Reliability When Classifying MR Imaging of the Lumbar Spine: Written Instructions Alone Do Not Suffice.

Authors:  Ulf Krister Hofmann; Ramona Luise Keller; Marco Gesicki; Christian Walter; Falk Mittag
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.471

View more
  3 in total

1.  Imaging diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis in the fifth lumbar nerve root: reliability and reproducibility of T1-weighted three-dimensional lumbar MRI.

Authors:  Ko Hashimoto; Yasuhisa Tanaka; Takumi Tsubakino; Takeshi Hoshikawa; Tomowaki Nakagawa; Takashi Inawashiro; Kohei Takahashi; Masaru Suda; Toshimi Aizawa
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

2.  MRI and Anatomical Determinants Affecting Neuroforaminal Stenosis Evaluation: A Descriptive Observational Study.

Authors:  Sayed E Wahezi; Terence Hillery; Rene Przkora; Tim Lubenow; Tim Deer; Chong Kim; Dawood Sayed; Jonathan Krystal; Merritt Kinon; Kishan Sitapara; Kim Nguyen; Daniel Wong; Karen Sperling
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.832

3.  High-Resolution 3D versus Standard-Resolution 2D T2-Weighted Turbo Spin Echo MRI for the Assessment of Lumbar Nerve Root Compromise.

Authors:  Elisabeth Sartoretti; Thomas Sartoretti; Árpád Schwenk; Alex Alfieri; David Czell; Michael Wyss; Lukas Wildi; Christoph A Binkert; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-01-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.