| Literature DB >> 34095454 |
Gagandeep Kour1, Richa Kothari1, Sunil Dhar1, Deepak Pathania1,2, V V Tyagi3.
Abstract
Pollution-free rivers give indication of a healthy ecosystem. The stretch of Tawi river particularly in the Jammu city is experiencing pollution load and the quality is degraded. The present study highlights the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the water quality of Tawi river in Jammu, J&K Union Territory. Water quality data based upon the real-time water monitoring for four locations (Below Tawi Bridge, Bhagwati Nagar, Belicharana and Surajpur) have been obtained from the web link of Jammu and Kashmir Pollution Control Board. The important parameters used in the present study include pH, alkalinity, hardness, conductivity, BOD and COD. The river was designated fit for bathing in all the monitoring locations except Bhagwati Nagar which recorded a BOD value >5 mg/L because of domestic sewage and municipal waste dumping. The overall water quality in the river during lockdown was good and falls in Class B with pH (7.0-8.5), alkalinity (23.25-185.0 mg/L), hardness (84.25-177.5 mg/L), conductivity (117-268 ms/cm). The improved water quality obtained during lockdown is never long-lasting as evident from the BOD and COD values observed during Unlock 1.0 due to accelerated anthropogenic activities in response to overcoming the economic loss, bringing the river water quality back to the degraded state. The statistical analysis known as cluster analysis has also been performed to evaluate the homogeneity of various monitoring sites based on the physicochemical variables. The need of the hour is to address the gaps of rejuvenation strategies and work over them for effective river resiliency and for sustainable river basin management. © The Joint Center on Global Change and Earth System Science of the University of Maryland and Beijing Normal University 2021.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Jammu city; Lockdown; Tawi river basin; Water quality
Year: 2021 PMID: 34095454 PMCID: PMC8164404 DOI: 10.1007/s40974-021-00215-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Energy Ecol Environ
Main anthropogenic activities at the monitoring sites
| Location | Anthropogenic activities | Visible effluents |
|---|---|---|
| Below Tawi bridge | Bathing, washing, religious activities | Drain, organic pollutants |
| Bhagwati Nagar | Municipal waste dumping | Drain, waste from dumping site |
| Belicharana | Cattle bathing, washing | Drain from warehouse |
| Surajpur | Agricultural activities | Nil |
Fig. 1Location of monitoring stations in the downstream of Tawi river basin
Fig. 2Variability in the observed BOD (mg/L) values during 2018, 2019 and 2020
Fig. 3Comparison of the average half-yearly (January–June) values of BOD (mg/L) & COD (mg/L) during 2019 and 2020
Fig. 4Variations in the observed parameters at different monitoring sites during March to May, 2019 and March to May, 2020, showing declining trend in the values during the lockdown period
Average concentration of parameters at all the monitoring locations (January–June, 2020) (mean ± SD). Data
Source: Jammu and Kashmir State Pollution Board
| Location | pH | BOD (mg/L) | COD (mg/L) | Hardness (mg/L) | Alkalinity (mg/L) | Conductivity (ms/cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Below Tawi bridge | 8.10 ± 0.60 | 2.18 ± 0.55 | 11.33 ± 2.16 | 140.33 ± 52.85 | 128.67 ± 67.43 | 150.67 ± 32.49 |
| Bhagwati Nagar | 8.28 ± 0.56 | 5.80 ± 2.01 | 25.17 ± 7.81 | 144.00 ± 53.96 | 169.17 ± 103.32 | 375.67 ± 279.11 |
| Belicharana | 8.16 ± 0.56 | 0.38 ± 0.35 | 2.15 ± 0.89 | 127.17 ± 43.27 | 129.83 ± 67.96 | 149.33 ± 33.70 |
| Surajpur | 8.09 ± 0.59 | 0.35 ± 0.33 | 1.98 ± 0.47 | 125.67 ± 44.53 | 129.83 ± 70.09 | 148.67 ± 32.71 |
Fig. 5BOD and COD profile at different locations in Tawi river during the year 2020
Fig. 6Trend in the observed values of BOD and COD (mg/L) along the entire stream of river in Jammu city
Average concentration of parameters obtained over the entire stretch of the river from Jan to June, 2020. Data
Source: Jammu and Kashmir State Pollution Board
| Month (2020) | Parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | Alkalinity (mg/L) | Hardness (mg/L) | Conductivity (ms/cm) | ||
| Pre-lockdown | January | 8.73 | 208.00 | 171.00 | 296.00 |
| February | 8.74 | 216.00 | 186.00 | 308.00 | |
| Lockdown | March | 8.51 | 185.00 | 177.50 | 268.00 |
| April | 7.49 | 104.00 | 84.25 | 117.00 | |
| May | 7.59 | 23.25 | 88.00 | 120.00 | |
| Unlock 1.0 | June | 7.90 | 100.00 | 99.00 | 127.50 |
Fig. 7Bray–Curtis analysis of the monitoring sites