| Literature DB >> 34093531 |
Marcel Doerflinger1,2, Gabrielle M Haeusler3,4,5,6,7, Connie S N Li-Wai-Suen1,2, Julia E Clark8, Monica Slavin3,4,5,9,10, Franz E Babl6,11,12,13, Zoe Allaway3,4, Francoise Mechinaud14, Gordon K Smyth1,15, Richard De Abreu Lourenco16, Bob Phillips17, Marc Pellegrini1,2,4, Karin A Thursky3,4,5.
Abstract
Objectives: Febrile neutropenia (FN) causes treatment disruption and unplanned hospitalization in children with cancer. Serum biomarkers are infrequently used to stratify these patients into high or low risk for serious infection. This study investigated plasma abundance of cytokines in children with FN and their ability to predict bacteraemia.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; cancer; children; febrile neutropenia; risk stratification
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34093531 PMCID: PMC8173204 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.641879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Definitions of outcomes included in analysis.
| Outcome | Definition |
|---|---|
|
| A recognised bacterial pathogen (including organisms associated with mucosal barrier injury in the setting of mucositis or neutropenia) from ≥1 blood culture set or common commensals from ≥2 blood culture sets drawn on separate occasions. |
|
| An infection that was clinically detectable and microbiologically proven. |
|
| A site of infection that is diagnosed but its microbiological pathogenesis either cannot be proven or is inaccessible to examination. |
|
| Any febrile episode without a clinically detectable and microbiologically proven infection. |
|
| A paediatric FN clinical decision rule that incorporates three clinical variables (platelets <50 g/L, total white cell count <300 cells/m3 and chemotherapy more intensive than acute lymphoblastic leukaemia-maintenance phase) each with a weighted value of ‘1’ to predict bacterial infection. AUS-rule scores range from 0 to a maximum of 3. |
|
| Afebrile for more than 48h, recovery of ANC beyond nadir and antibiotic cessation. |
Demographic and outcome data of FN episodes.
| FN episodes without blood sample (n = 473) | FN episodes with blood sample at Day 1 (n = 79) | P- value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4.3 (2.9–8.4) | 6.0 (3.4–11.3) | 0.043 |
|
| 223 (47.2) | 39 (49.4) | 0.717 |
|
| |||
|
| 260 (55.0) | 49 (62.0) | 0.271 |
|
| 213 (45.0) | 30 (38.0) | |
|
| 4 (0.9) | 1 (1.3) | 0.548 |
|
| 15 (3.2) | 2 (2.5) | >0.99 |
|
| |||
|
| 66 (14.0) | 8* (10.1) | 0.14 |
|
| 90 (19.0) | 22 (27.8) | |
|
| 44 (9.3) | 11 (13.9) | |
|
| 273 (57.7) | 38 (48.1) | |
|
| 6.3 (2.8–12.2) | 4.9 (2.5–9.1) | 0.04 |
|
| 6.0 (3.1–13.3) | 5.13 (3.0-7.6) | 0.07 |
|
| 2 (0.4) | 0 | >0.99 |
FN, febrile neutropenia; IQR, interquartile range; ICU, intensive care unit; MDI, microbiologically defined infection; CDI, clinically defined infection; FUO, fever of unknown cause; LOS, length of stay.
*Gram negative (Klebsiella pneumoniae/Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia fergusonii, Neisseria lactamica, Pseudomonas species, Escherichia coli) and Gram positive (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis).
Performance of biomarkers to predict bacteraemia at FN presentation (Day 1).
| AUC | p-value | Threshold | Sensitivity% (95% CI) | Specificity% (95% CI) | Positive LR | Negative LR | Youden Index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.842 | 0.002 | >0.425 [ng/ml] | 100 (68–100) | 78 (67–86) | 4.5 | 0 | 0.77 |
|
| 0.826 | 0.003 | > 16.66 [pg/ml] | 75.0 (41–96) | 82 (71–89) | 4.2 | 0.3 | 0.57 |
|
| 0.780 | 0.010 | > 52.79 [pg/ml] | 63 (31–86) | 90 (81–95) | 6.3 | 0.4 | 0.53 |
|
| 0.695 | 0.073 | >62.5 [ug/ml] | 50 (22–79) | 78 (67–86) | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.27 |
|
| 0.625 | 0.249 | >356 [pg/ml] | 50 (22–79) | 90 (81–95) | 5 | 0.6 | 0.40 |
|
| 0.666 | 0.127 | >665.5 [pg/ml] | 50 (22–79) | 80 (70–88) | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.30 |
AUC, Area Under the Curve; CI, Confidence interval; LR, likelihood ratio.
Figure 1Decision tree classification model including PCT and IL-10. (A) Scatterplot showing distribution of IL-10 and PCT values of Day 1 samples. Red-bacteraemia cases, grey-no bacteraemia. (*) depicts ICU admission, (#) depicts severe sepsis diagnosis. (B) Decision tree model to identify low risk and high risk episodes using PCT and IL-10 with the indicated threshold values.
Combined performance of AUS-rule and PCT and IL-10 for prediction of bacteraemia episodes in children with febrile neutropenia (shaded area are episodes classified as low-risk).
| Risk status according to AUS-rule | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low risk | High Risk | Total, n (%) | ||||
| 0 (n = 10) | 1 (n = 26) | 2 (n = 28) | 3 (n = 15) | |||
|
|
| |||||
| Low risk | 6 | 21 | 17 | 11* | 55 (69.6%) | |
| High risk | 4 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 16 (20.3%) | |
| High risk | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4^ | 8 (10.1%) | |
|
| ||||||
| Low risk | 6 | 21 | 17 | 11* | 55 | |
| Low risk | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 8 (10.1%) | |
| High risk | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 (10.1%) | |
| High risk (PCT ≥0.425 ng/ml & IL-10 ≥4.37 pg/ml), bacteraemia, n | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4^ | 8 (10.1%) | |
*includes one episode admitted to ICU 11 days after initial presentation with FN; ^ includes one episode with severe E. coli bacteraemia, sepsis at presentation and ICU admission.
Figure 2Mean Plasma PCT and IL-10 levels between time of FN presentation (Day 1) and Day 2 when comparing bacteraemia cases with all other causes of FN. P-values shown were calculated using ROC analysis comparing bacteraemia cases with non-bacteraemia cases at Days 1 and 2. Data shown as Mean and SEM. **p <0.005, nsp >0.05 (not significant).