| Literature DB >> 34093480 |
Qi Wei1,2,3, Xinyuan Pan1,4, Jie Li1, Zhen Jia1, Ting Fang1, Yuji Jiang1.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to isolate and identify the dominant microorganism in Flammulina velutipes fruiting bodies (FVFB) and to develop kinetic models for describing its growth. The native microflora community on FVFB was isolated and identified using morphological examination and high-throughput sequencing analysis. FVFB presented complex microbial communities with dominant microorganisms being Lactococcus lactis. Irradiated FVFB were inoculated with the isolated strain of L. lactis and cultivated at various temperatures (4, 10, 16, 20, 25, 32, and 37°C). Three primary models, namely the Huang, Baranyi and Roberts, and reparameterized Gompertz models, and three secondary models, namely the Huang square-root, Ratkowsky square-root, and Arrhenius-type models, were developed and evaluated. With the lowest values of mean square error (MSE, 0.023-0.161) and root mean square error (RMSE, 0.152-0.401) values, the reparameterized Gompertz model was more suitable to describe the growth of L. lactis on FVFB than both Huang and Baranyi and Roberts models. The Ratkowsky square-root model provided more accurate estimation for the effect of temperature on the specific growth rate of L. lactis. The minimum growth temperature predicted by the Ratkowsky square-root model was -7.1°C. The kinetic models developed in this study could be used to evaluate the growth behavior of L. lactis on FVFB and estimate the shelf-life of FVFB.Entities:
Keywords: Flammulina velutipes; Lactococcus lactis; growth; mathematical model; microflora
Year: 2021 PMID: 34093480 PMCID: PMC8176924 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.664874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1PCR amplification results.
The species of bacteria in Flammulina velutipes fruiting bodies.
| + | − | − | − | − | |
| + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | − | − | − | − | |
| + | − | − | − | − | |
| + | − | − | − | − | |
| + | − | − | − | − | |
| − | + | − | − | + | |
| − | + | − | − | − | |
| − | + | + | + | − | |
| − | − | − | + | − | |
| − | − | − | + | − | |
| − | − | − | − | + |
Morphological characteristics of identified bacteria in Flammulina velutipes fruiting bodies.
| 0.71∼0.76 | Regular, smooth, white | Positive | Cocci | |
| 0.51∼1.79 | Regular, smooth, white | Negative | Rods | |
| 2.27∼4.98 | Irregular, smooth, white | Positive | Rods | |
| 1.36∼2.70 | Regular, smooth, white | Negative | Rods | |
| 1.71∼2.63 | Regular, smooth, white | Negative | Rods | |
| 2.60∼4.21 | Regular, smooth, raised, white | Negative | Rods | |
| 2.07∼2.20 | Irregular, raised, white | Positive | Rods | |
| 3.38∼5.07 | Regular, smooth, flat, pale green | Negative | Rods | |
| 1.15∼1.47 | Regular, smooth, white | Positive | Cocci | |
| 1.66∼2.68 | Regular, smooth, white | Negative | Rods | |
| 0.74∼1.11 | Regular, smooth, raised, buff | Negative | Rods | |
| 1.27∼1.60 | Regular, smooth, buff | Positive | Cocci |
FIGURE 2Colony morphology of the identified native microflora in Flammulina velutipes fruiting bodies under a microscope: (A) without staining and (B) Gram staining.
FIGURE 3Relative abundance of native microflora in Flammulina velutipes fruiting bodies. (A) Phylum level, (B) genus level, and (C) species level.
Estimated parameters for the primary models.
| 7.63 | 7.046 | 7.604 | 7.922 | 7.205 | 7.878 | 8.406 | 8.441 | 8.211 | 7.597 | 7.66 | 7.281 | 9.389 | 9.58 | 9.048 | 9.862 | 10.043 | 9.482 | 10.213 | 10.335 | 9.905 | |
| L95CI | 7.356 | 6.551 | 7.278 | 7.681 | 6.688 | 7.739 | 7.699 | 7.875 | 7.584 | 6.809 | 7.046 | 6.603 | 8.491 | 8.862 | 8.097 | 9.066 | 9.351 | 8.612 | 9.333 | 9.539 | 8.927 |
| U95CI | 7.903 | 7.541 | 7.93 | 8.164 | 7.722 | 8.017 | 9.114 | 9.006 | 8.839 | 8.348 | 8.273 | 7.959 | 10.287 | 10.299 | 9.999 | 10.658 | 10.736 | 10.353 | 11.094 | 11.132 | 10.883 |
| 15.418 | 15.481 | 15.464 | 18.017 | 18.189 | 18.271 | 18.785 | 18.718 | 19.012 | 17.277 | 17.128 | 17.661 | 18.407 | 18.217 | 18.69 | 18.483 | 18.369 | 18.749 | 18.793 | 18.66 | 19.036 | |
| L95CI | 15.172 | 15.055 | 15.153 | 17.749 | 17.586 | 18.098 | 18.363 | 18.299 | 18.627 | 16.695 | 16.554 | 17.206 | 17.715 | 17.496 | 18.049 | 17.975 | 17.838 | 18.282 | 18.118 | 17.952 | 18.407 |
| U95CI | 15.663 | 15.906 | 15.774 | 18.286 | 18.792 | 18.445 | 19.207 | 19.136 | 19.397 | 17.86 | 17.703 | 18.116 | 19.099 | 18.937 | 19.331 | 18.991 | 18.9 | 19.216 | 19.467 | 19.368 | 19.665 |
| μmax (h–1) | 0.075 | 0.054 | 0.09 | 0.083 | 0.066 | 0.101 | 0.191 | 0.221 | 0.235 | 0.432 | 0.519 | 0.501 | 0.54 | 0.665 | 0.637 | 0.678 | 0.818 | 0.772 | 0.883 | 1.085 | 1.011 |
| L95CI | 0.063 | 0.048 | 0.07 | 0.076 | 0.06 | 0.095 | 0.163 | 0.199 | 0.199 | 0.356 | 0.458 | 0.432 | 0.433 | 0.573 | 0.522 | 0.539 | 0.711 | 0.634 | 0.646 | 0.919 | 0.779 |
| U95CI | 0.087 | 0.059 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.071 | 0.107 | 0.22 | 0.242 | 0.272 | 0.508 | 0.581 | 0.57 | 0.648 | 0.756 | 0.752 | 0.817 | 0.924 | 0.91 | 1.12 | 1.251 | 1.243 |
| λ (h) | 84.427 | 51.925 | 89.142 | 69 | 42.484 | 76.285 | 8.693 | 12.687 | 11.358 | 3.421 | 5.402 | 3.85 | 2.216 | 4.216 | 2.475 | 2.02 | 3.427 | 1.949 | 1.473 | 2.584 | 1.527 |
| MSE (ln CFU/g) | 0.119 | 0.319 | 0.161 | 0.076 | 0.321 | 0.023 | 0.202 | 0.219 | 0.113 | 0.242 | 0.284 | 0.092 | 0.212 | 0.303 | 0.119 | 0.251 | 0.318 | 0.136 | 0.226 | 0.302 | 0.126 |
| RMSE [(ln CFU/g)2] | 0.345 | 0.564 | 0.401 | 0.276 | 0.566 | 0.152 | 0.449 | 0.468 | 0.337 | 0.492 | 0.533 | 0.303 | 0.46 | 0.55 | 0.345 | 0.501 | 0.564 | 0.368 | 0.476 | 0.549 | 0.356 |
FIGURE 4Growth of Lactococcus lactis in Flammulina velutipes fruiting bodies at temperatures between 4 and 37°C. Solid red line: Huang model, solid black line: Baranyi and Roberts model, solid blue line: reparameterized Gompertz model, diamond: observed growth data.
FIGURE 5Effect of temperature on the specific growth rate of Lactococcus lactis in Flammulina velutipes fruiting bodies. (A) Huang square-root model, (B) Ratkowsky square-root model, and (C) Arrhenius-type model.
Estimated parameters for the secondary models.
| Huang square-root model | 0.064 | 0.005 | 13.556 | 3.91E-05 | 0.005 | 0.068 | |
| −1.7 | 2.142 | −0.784 | 4.69E-01 | ||||
| Ratkowsky square-root model | 0.023 | 0.002 | 10.298 | 1.485E-04 | 0.004 | 0.065 | |
| −7.2 | 2.894 | −2.48 | 5.581E-02 | ||||
| Arrhenius-type model | 0.004 | 0.001 | 3.254 | 3.13E-02 | 0.005 | 0.068 | |
| Δ | 2,447.797 | 42.924 | 57.026 | 5.662E-07 | |||
| 20.957 | 8.61 | 2.434 | 7.17E-02 |