| Literature DB >> 34092780 |
Feng He1, Yun Liang2, Xiaoling Gong1, Alei Wang1, Weizhu Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nursing education is an important part of the "9+3" vocational education program led by Sichuan Province. In the internship stage, nursing students of Tibetan ethnicity may have problems of intercultural adaptation in the process of getting along with patients, which may affect the effective nursing outcome. The purpose of this study was to clarify the current situation of transcultural adaptation of Tibetan trainee nurses and to provide more theoretical support and guidance. MATERIAL AND METHODS We collected 237 valid survey questionnaires, based on Ward's acculturation process model, from a total of 363 Tibetan trainee nurses in the "9+3" free vocational education program in Chengdu, Luzhou, and Nanchong of Sichuan Province. The SPSSAU project (2020), an online application software retrieved from https://www.spssau.com, was used for data coding and archiving. RESULTS The results of questionnaire and data analysis showed that the overall level of transcultural adaptation of Tibetan trainee nurses was that the number of people with poor adaptation was slightly higher than those with good adaptation, and most Tibetan trainee nurses were in the middle level. Meanwhile, sociocultural adaptation was better than psychological adaptation. There were no statistically significant differences among the 4 grouping variables: gender, student home region, the city where the internship hospital was located, and whether they were from a single-child family or not. CONCLUSIONS The results revealed that there was still transcultural maladjustment among Tibetan nurses in the internship stage, and the psychological maladjustment was more obvious than the sociocultural maladjustment. We provide countermeasures and suggestions to solve the problems of transcultural adaptation reflected in the research.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34092780 PMCID: PMC8191521 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.931729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Composition of the object.
| Gender | Student source region | One-child family | City administration level where the internship hospital was located | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Urban | Rural or grazing district | Urban rural fringe area | Yes | No | Provincial capital city | Prefecture level city | County level City | Rural area |
| 222 (93.67%) | 15 (6.33%) | 197 (83.12%) | 27 (11.39%) | 13 (5.49%) | 51 (21.52%) | 186 (78.48%) | 36 (15.19%) | 161 (67.93%) | 38 (16.03%) | 2 (0.84%) |
| N=237 | N=237 | N=237 | N=237 | |||||||
| ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cronbach’s Alpha | Cronbach’s Alpha Based on Standardized items | N of Items | n | |
| Sociocultural adaptation | 0.951 | 0.952 | 22 (Q5 to Q26) | 237 |
| Psychological adaptation | 0.789 | 0.787 | 20 (Q27 to Q46) | 237 |
| ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Items | Corrected item-total correlation (CITC) | Cronbach Alpha if item deleted | Cronbach α |
| Q5 | 0.450 | 0.951 | 0.951 |
| Q6 | 0.337 | 0.952 | |
| Q7 | 0.534 | 0.950 | |
| Q8 | 0.634 | 0.949 | |
| Q9 | 0.738 | 0.947 | |
| Q10 | 0.745 | 0.947 | |
| Q11 | 0.670 | 0.948 | |
| Q12 | 0.651 | 0.949 | |
| Q13 | 0.717 | 0.948 | |
| Q14 | 0.686 | 0.948 | |
| Q15 | 0.608 | 0.950 | |
| Q16 | 0.660 | 0.949 | |
| Q17 | 0.748 | 0.947 | |
| Q18 | 0.724 | 0.948 | |
| Q19 | 0.764 | 0.947 | |
| Q20 | 0.799 | 0.947 | |
| Q21 | 0.825 | 0.947 | |
| Q22 | 0.744 | 0.948 | |
| Q23 | 0.666 | 0.949 | |
| Q24 | 0.639 | 0.949 | |
| Q25 | 0.717 | 0.948 | |
| Q26 | 0.698 | 0.948 | |
Cronbach α (Standardized): 0.952.
| ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Items | Corrected item-total correlation (CITC) | Cronbach Alpha if item deleted | Cronbach α |
| Q27 | 0.328 | 0.782 | 0.789 |
| Q28 | 0.335 | 0.781 | |
| Q29 | 0.424 | 0.778 | |
| Q30 | 0.216 | 0.788 | |
| Q31 | 0.439 | 0.774 | |
| Q32 | 0.267 | 0.786 | |
| Q33 | 0.109 | 0.792 | |
| Q34 | 0.136 | 0.792 | |
| Q35 | 0.261 | 0.785 | |
| Q36 | 0.214 | 0.788 | |
| Q37 | 0.464 | 0.772 | |
| Q38 | 0.376 | 0.778 | |
| Q39 | 0.265 | 0.785 | |
| Q40 | 0.523 | 0.767 | |
| Q41 | 0.257 | 0.785 | |
| Q42 | 0.270 | 0.785 | |
| Q43 | 0.578 | 0.764 | |
| Q44 | 0.555 | 0.766 | |
| Q45 | 0.313 | 0.782 | |
| Q46 | 0.585 | 0.762 | |
Cronbach α (Standardized): 0.787.
KMO and Bartlett test of all items.
| KMO | 0.919 | |
| Bartlett test | Approx. Chi-Square | 4614.674 |
| 231 | ||
| 0.000 | ||
Figure 1Scree test from the sociocultural acculturation questionnaire: the EFA identified the 3 dimensions of this questionnaires as demonstrated in the scree plot explaining 68.831% of the variance.
Total variance explained of all items.
| Factor | Eigen values | % of variance (initial) | % of variance (rotated) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigen | % of Variance | Cum. % of Variance | Eigen | % of Variance | Cum. % of Variance | Eigen | % of Variance | Cum. % of Variance | |
| 1 | 11.184 | 50.837 | 50.837 | 11.184 | 50.837 | 50.837 | 6.102 | 27.735 | 27.735 |
| 2 | 2.444 | 11.109 | 61.946 | 2.444 | 11.109 | 61.946 | 5.700 | 25.910 | 53.645 |
| 3 | 1.515 | 6.885 | 68.831 | 1.515 | 6.885 | 68.831 | 3.341 | 15.186 | 68.831 |
| 4 | 1.058 | 4.810 | 73.640 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5 | 0.927 | 4.214 | 77.854 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 6 | 0.583 | 2.650 | 80.504 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 7 | 0.506 | 2.301 | 82.805 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 8 | 0.463 | 2.105 | 84.910 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 9 | 0.447 | 2.031 | 86.941 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 10 | 0.401 | 1.822 | 88.763 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 11 | 0.368 | 1.672 | 90.435 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 12 | 0.314 | 1.427 | 91.861 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 13 | 0.298 | 1.355 | 93.217 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 14 | 0.243 | 1.103 | 94.320 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 15 | 0.241 | 1.096 | 95.416 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 16 | 0.207 | 0.942 | 96.358 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 17 | 0.204 | 0.928 | 97.285 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 18 | 0.172 | 0.780 | 98.066 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 19 | 0.150 | 0.681 | 98.747 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 20 | 0.114 | 0.519 | 99.265 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 21 | 0.091 | 0.413 | 99.678 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 22 | 0.071 | 0.322 | 100.000 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Factor loading (rotated).
| Items | Factor loading | Communalities | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | ||
| Q5 | 0.088 | 0.201 | 0.686 | |
| Q6 | 0.041 | 0.093 | 0.612 | |
| Q7 | 0.183 | 0.228 | 0.725 | |
| Q8 | 0.096 | 0.394 | 0.623 | |
| Q9 | 0.294 | 0.325 | 0.652 | |
| Q10 | 0.409 | 0.623 | ||
| Q11 | 0.311 | 0.316 | 0.530 | |
| Q12 | 0.120 | 0.085 | 0.734 | |
| Q13 | 0.312 | 0.072 | 0.691 | |
| Q14 | 0.260 | 0.037 | 0.690 | |
| Q15 | 0.159 | 0.010 | 0.645 | |
| Q16 | 0.395 | 0.378 | 0.501 | |
| Q17 | 0.041 | 0.702 | ||
| Q18 | 0.019 | 0.672 | ||
| Q19 | 0.024 | 0.732 | ||
| Q20 | 0.081 | 0.785 | ||
| Q21 | 0.131 | 0.804 | ||
| Q22 | 0.285 | 0.725 | ||
| Q23 | 0.092 | 0.784 | ||
| Q24 | 0.120 | 0.695 | ||
| Q25 | 0.285 | 0.171 | 0.735 | |
| Q26 | 0.162 | 0.834 | 0.273 | 0.796 |
Bold indicates that the absolute value of loading is greater than 0.4, and red indicates that the communality is less than 0.4.
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results of psychological adaptation dimension.
3.2.1 KMO and Bartlett test of all items.
| KMO | 0.854 | |
| Bartlett test | Approx. Chi-Square | 1947.425 |
| 190 | ||
| 0.000 | ||
Factor loading (rotated) of all items.
| Items | Factor loading | Communalities | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | ||
| Q27 | −0.032 | 0.135 | 0.094 | 0.643 | |
| Q29 | 0.092 | 0.063 | 0.068 | 0.750 | |
| Q30 | −0.096 | 0.084 | −0.004 | 0.543 | |
| Q31 | 0.353 | 0.084 | −0.017 | 0.579 | |
| Q34 | −0.042 | 0.087 | −0.091 | 0.654 | |
| Q35 | −0.010 | 0.357 | −0.111 | 0.659 | |
| Q36 | 0.130 | 0.355 | 0.578 | ||
| Q37 | 0.379 | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.712 | |
| Q38 | 0.379 | −0.093 | −0.112 | 0.727 | |
| Q39 | 0.008 | 0.319 | −0.152 | 0.558 | |
| Q28 | 0.084 | 0.025 | 0.016 | ||
| Q32 | −0.162 | −0.016 | 0.275 | ||
| Q33 | −0.123 | 0.097 | 0.053 | 0.418 | |
| Q40 | 0.730 | −0.016 | −0.024 | 0.282 | 0.613 |
| Q41 | 0.045 | 0.408 | −0.222 | 0.527 | |
| Q42 | −0.172 | −0.179 | 0.227 | 0.419 | |
| Q43 | 0.028 | −0.042 | 0.177 | 0.721 | |
| Q44 | 0.078 | −0.048 | 0.065 | 0.708 | |
| Q45 | 0.016 | 0.027 | 0.542 | ||
| Q46 | 0.044 | 0.001 | 0.235 | 0.674 | |
Bold indicates that the absolute value of loading is greater than 0.4, and italics indicates that the communality is less than 0.4.
Factor loading (rotated).
| Items | Factor loading | Communalities | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | ||
| Q27 | −0.044 | 0.143 | 0.116 | 0.633 | |
| Q29 | 0.091 | 0.063 | 0.075 | 0.743 | |
| Q30 | −0.129 | 0.075 | 0.028 | 0.556 | |
| Q31 | 0.324 | 0.089 | −0.024 | 0.578 | |
| Q34 | −0.049 | 0.088 | −0.088 | 0.666 | |
| Q35 | −0.019 | 0.373 | −0.118 | 0.651 | |
| Q36 | 0.112 | 0.331 | 0.583 | ||
| Q37 | 0.387 | −0.010 | 0.017 | 0.712 | |
| Q38 | 0.391 | −0.107 | −0.099 | 0.732 | |
| Q39 | 0.026 | 0.301 | −0.173 | 0.569 | |
| Q33 | −0.126 | 0.096 | 0.049 | 0.424 | |
| Q40 | −0.012 | −0.019 | 0.289 | 0.615 | |
| Q41 | 0.034 | 0.390 | −0.217 | 0.527 | |
| Q42 | −0.187 | −0.156 | 0.220 | 0.442 | |
| Q43 | 0.026 | −0.027 | 0.177 | 0.754 | |
| Q44 | 0.080 | −0.037 | 0.073 | 0.721 | |
| Q45 | 0.023 | 0.027 | 0.549 | ||
| Q46 | 0.052 | 0.004 | 0.215 | 0.706 | |
Bold indicates that the absolute value of loading is greater than 0.4.
Figure 2Scree test from the psychological acculturation questionnaire: the EFA identified the 4 dimensions of this questionnaires as demonstrated in the scree plot explaining 61.999% of the variance.
KMO and Bartlett tes.
| KMO | 0.850 | |
| Bartlett test | Approx. Chi-Square | 1840.170 |
| 153 | ||
| 0.000 | ||
Total variance explained.
| Factor | Eigen values | % of variance (initial) | % of variance (rotated) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigen | % of variance | Cum. % of variance | Eigen | % of variance | Cum. % of variance | Eigen | % of variance | Cum. % of variance | |
| 1 | 4.860 | 27.002 | 27.002 | 4.860 | 27.002 | 27.002 | 3.420 | 19.000 | 19.000 |
| 2 | 4.015 | 22.306 | 49.308 | 4.015 | 22.306 | 49.308 | 3.349 | 18.606 | 37.607 |
| 3 | 1.195 | 6.641 | 55.949 | 1.195 | 6.641 | 55.949 | 2.292 | 12.731 | 50.338 |
| 4 | 1.089 | 6.050 | 61.999 | 1.089 | 6.050 | 61.999 | 2.099 | 11.661 | 61.999 |
| 5 | 0.937 | 5.204 | 67.203 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 6 | 0.830 | 4.610 | 71.813 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 7 | 0.704 | 3.911 | 75.724 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 8 | 0.668 | 3.713 | 79.437 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 9 | 0.498 | 2.765 | 82.202 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 10 | 0.487 | 2.707 | 84.909 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 11 | 0.448 | 2.489 | 87.397 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 12 | 0.428 | 2.376 | 89.773 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 13 | 0.380 | 2.113 | 91.887 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 14 | 0.353 | 1.962 | 93.849 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 15 | 0.322 | 1.787 | 95.636 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 16 | 0.304 | 1.688 | 97.324 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 17 | 0.265 | 1.469 | 98.793 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 18 | 0.217 | 1.207 | 100.000 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Acculturation average score.
| N | Sociocultural adaptability | Psychological adaptability | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average scores | 237 | 85.14±16.60 | 38.70±10.19 |
Statistical table of overall level of sociocultural acculturation.
| Z <−1 | −1 ≤Z ≤0 | 0 <Z ≤1 | Z >1 | Good adaptability | Poor adaptability | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 41 | 80 | 69 | 47 | 116 | 121 | 237 |
| % | 17.3 | 33.8 | 29.1 | 19.8 | 48.9 | 51.1 | 100 |
Statistical table of the overall level of psychological adaptation.
| Z <−1 | −1 ≤Z ≤0 | 0 <Z ≤1 | Z >1 | Good adaptability | Poor adaptability | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 41 | 68 | 96 | 32 | 109 | 128 | 237 |
| % | 17.3 | 28.7 | 40.5 | 13.5 | 46.0 | 54.0 | 100 |
The overall situation of acculturation of trainee nurses of different genders.
| Female (N=222) | Male (N=15) | Levene’s test for equality of variances | t-test for equality of variances | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P value | t | P value | |||
| Sociocultural adaptability | 85.58±16.36 | 78.53±19.17 | 0.627 | 0.429 | 1.597 | 0.112 |
| Psychological adaptability | 38.73±10.17 | 38.20±10.86 | 0.000 | 0.992 | 1.195 | 0.846 |
The overall situation of transcultural adaptation of Tibetan trainee nurses from different student source region.
| Student source region | Test of homogenity of variances | ANOVA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban (N=197) | Rural or grazing district (N=27) | Urban rural fringe area (N=13) | Levene statistic value | P Value | F Value | P Value | |
| Sociocultural adaptability | 84.52±1.22 | 85.85±2.64 | 92.92±3.16 | 2.159 | 0.118 | 1.599 | 0.204 |
| Psychological adaptability | 39.13±0.75 | 34.96±1.53 | 39.92±2.44 | 0.818 | 0.443 | 2.103 | 0.124 |
The overall situation of transcultural adaptation of Tibetan trainee nurses from single-child or multi-child families.
| One-Child family | Levene’s Test for equality of variances | t-test for equality of variances | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (N=51) | No (N=186) | F | P value | t | P value | |
| Sociocultural adaptability | 88.55±2.34 | 84.20±1.21 | 0.829 | 0.364 | 1.665 | 0.097 |
| Psychological adaptability | 37.10±1.60 | 39.13±0.72 | 2.066 | 0.152 | −1.266 | 0.207 |
The overall situation of transcultural adaptation of city administration level of internship.
| City administration level where the internship hospital was located | Test of homogenity of variances | ANOVA | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| provincial capital city (N=36) | Prefecture level city (N=161) | County level City (N=38) | Rural area (N=2) | Levene statistic value | P value | F | P value | |
| Sociocultural adaptability | 87.11±2.56 | 84.41±1.35 | 86.34±2.60 | 85.00±3.00 | 2.146 | 0.095 | 0.337 | 0.799 |
| Psychological adaptability | 36.17±1.79 | 39.21±0.77 | 39.26±1.86 | 32.00±3.00 | 1.325 | 0.267 | 1.207 | 0.308 |
The questionnaire of transcultural adaptation of Tibetan nursing trainees.
| Serial number | Questions | Answers | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |||||
| Urban | Rural or grazing district | Urban rural fringe area | ||||
| Yes | No | |||||
| Provincial capital city | Prefecture level city | County level city | Rural area | |||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Uncertainty | Agree | Strongly agree | ||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||
| A little of the time | Some of the time | Good part of the time | Most of the time | |||