OBJECTIVE: We examined the associations among perceived discrimination, racial/ethnic identification, and emotional distress in newly homeless adolescents. METHODS: We assessed a sample of newly homeless adolescents (n=254) in Los Angeles, California, with measures of perceived discrimination and racial/ethnic identification. We assessed emotional distress using the Brief Symptom Inventory and used multivariate linear regression modeling to gauge the impact of discrimination and racial identity on emotional distress. RESULTS: Controlling for race and immigration status, gender, and age, young people with a greater sense of ethnic identification experienced less emotional distress. Young people with a history of racial/ethnic discrimination experienced more emotional distress. CONCLUSION: Intervention programs that contextualize discrimination and enhance racial/ethnic identification and pride among homeless young people are needed.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the associations among perceived discrimination, racial/ethnic identification, and emotional distress in newly homeless adolescents. METHODS: We assessed a sample of newly homeless adolescents (n=254) in Los Angeles, California, with measures of perceived discrimination and racial/ethnic identification. We assessed emotional distress using the Brief Symptom Inventory and used multivariate linear regression modeling to gauge the impact of discrimination and racial identity on emotional distress. RESULTS: Controlling for race and immigration status, gender, and age, young people with a greater sense of ethnic identification experienced less emotional distress. Young people with a history of racial/ethnic discrimination experienced more emotional distress. CONCLUSION: Intervention programs that contextualize discrimination and enhance racial/ethnic identification and pride among homeless young people are needed.
Authors: Laura M Bogart; Marc N Elliott; David E Kanouse; David J Klein; Susan L Davies; Paula M Cuccaro; Stephen W Banspach; Melissa F Peskin; Mark A Schuster Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.308