Literature DB >> 34090850

Comparative analysis of various extraction processes based on economy, eco-friendly, purity and recovery of polyhydroxyalkanoate: A review.

Neethu Sheri Kurian1, Bannhi Das2.   

Abstract

Bioplastics have been an interesting area of research and development in the last few decades. Normal plastics are made out of petroleum products, which is a non-renewable resource. Apart from that, its non-biodegradable nature makes it a serious threat to the environment, and hence a better alternative is needed. Bioplastics are synthesized by microorganisms and are biodegradable; this property makes them a promising alternative to normal plastic. However, the major drawback related to bioplastic is the high cost of its production. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) is a very popular biopolymer produced by different types of microbes. The review focuses on the different methods of extraction of PHA based on the percentage of purity, recovery, eco-friendly, and cost-effectiveness. There is a wide array of extraction methods reported to date, wherein there is the involvement of different types of solvents (like halogenated, non-halogenated, and green solvents) or mechanical or enzymatic methods. Each extraction process has its advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we have attempted to present a structured comparison of these different methods and highlight the factors that can be addressed for better extraction of PHA thereby making it a feasible alternative to commercial synthetic plastic.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopolymers; Green solvents; Halogenated solvents; Non-PHA cell mass; PHA

Year:  2021        PMID: 34090850     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol        ISSN: 0141-8130            Impact factor:   6.953


  2 in total

1.  Improvement of the Polyhydroxyalkanoates Recovery from Mixed Microbial Cultures Using Sodium Hypochlorite Pre-Treatment Coupled with Solvent Extraction.

Authors:  Gabriela Montiel-Jarillo; Diego A Morales-Urrea; Edgardo M Contreras; Alex López-Córdoba; Edwin Yesid Gómez-Pachón; Julián Carrera; María Eugenia Suárez-Ojeda
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 2.  Insightful Advancement and Opportunities for Microbial Bioplastic Production.

Authors:  Kanchan Samadhiya; Rimjhim Sangtani; Regina Nogueira; Kiran Bala
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.