Literature DB >> 34090704

Non-exenterative surgical management of recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

Lea A Moukarzel1, Kenya F Braxton1, Quin C Zhou2, Silvana Pedra Nobre1, Alexia Iasonos3, Kaled M Alektiar4, William P Tew5, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum6, Mario M Leitao6, Dennis S Chi6, Jennifer J Mueller7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of non-exenterative secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) compared with non-surgical treatments and identify predictors of improved survival for patients with recurrent endometrial cancer (EC).
METHODS: All patients undergoing primary surgical management for EC 1/1/2009-12/31/2017 who subsequently developed recurrence were retrospectively identified. Survival was determined from date of diagnosis of first recurrence to last follow-up and estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in survival were analyzed using Log-rank and Wald tests, based on Cox Proportional Hazards model.
RESULTS: Among 376 patients with recurrent EC, median time to recurrence was 14.3 months (range, 0.2-102.2), post-recurrence median survival 29 months, median follow-up 29.2 months (range, 0-116). Sixty-one patients (16.2%) received SCS, 257 (68.4%) medical management (MM) (chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy), 32 (8.5%) hormonal therapy, 26 (6.9%) no further therapy. Patients selected for SCS were younger, had more endometrioid histology, more stage I disease at initial diagnosis, no residual disease after primary surgery, longer interval to first recurrence or progression, and the longest OS (57.6 months) (95% CI, 33.3-not reached). On multivariate analysis SCS was an independent predictor of improved survival. Among the 61 SCS patients, age < 70 at time of initial diagnosis, and endometrioid histology, were associated with improved post-relapse survival univariately (p = 0.008, 0.03, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: While MM was the most common treatment for first recurrence of EC, patients selected for surgery demonstrated the greatest survival benefit even after controlling for tumor size, site, histology, stage, time to recurrence. Careful patient selection and favorable tumor factors likely play a major role in improved outcomes. Surgical management should be considered whenever feasible in medically eligible patients, with additional consideration given to our suggested criteria.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Endometrial cancer; Radiation therapy; Recurrent endometrial cancer; Surgical cytoreduction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34090704      PMCID: PMC8319948          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.304


  21 in total

1.  Cytoreductive surgery for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joyce N Barlin; Isha Puri; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Pelvic exenteration for recurrent endometrial cancer.

Authors:  R R Barakat; N A Goldman; D A Patel; E S Venkatraman; J P Curtin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Predictors of favorable survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ayumi Shikama; Takeo Minaguchi; Wataru Takao; Yoshihiko Hosokawa; Keiko Nishida; Nobutaka Tasaka; Azusa Akiyama; Manabu Sakurai; Hiroyuki Ochi; Toyomi Satoh
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Patterns of recurrence and outcomes in surgically treated women with endometrial cancer according to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference risk groups: Results from the FRANCOGYN study Group.

Authors:  Sofiane Bendifallah; Lobna Ouldamer; Vincent Lavoue; Geoffroy Canlorbe; Emilie Raimond; Charles Coutant; Olivier Graesslin; Cyril Touboul; Pierre Collinet; Emile Daraï; Marcos Ballester
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Carien L Creutzberg; Wim L J van Putten; Peter C Koper; Marnix L M Lybeert; Jan J Jobsen; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Karin A J De Winter; Ludy C H W Lutgens; Alfons C M van den Bergh; Elzbieta van der Steen-Banasik; Henk Beerman; Mat van Lent
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Kimberly Walker-Thurmond; Michael J Thun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: Time for a Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Andrea Papadia; Filippo Bellati; Antonino Ditto; Giorgio Bogani; Maria Luisa Gasparri; Violante Di Donato; Fabio Martinelli; Domenica Lorusso; Pierluigi Benedetti-Panici; Francesco Raspagliesi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Management of recurrent endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: an overview.

Authors:  F H van Wijk; M E L van der Burg; Curt W Burger; Ignace Vergote; Helena C van Doorn
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Recurrent adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a clinical and histopathological study of 379 patients.

Authors:  J G Aalders; V Abeler; P Kolstad
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Factors predicting recurrent endometrial cancer.

Authors:  A N J Huijgens; H J M M Mertens
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.