Literature DB >> 12713981

Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial.

Carien L Creutzberg1, Wim L J van Putten, Peter C Koper, Marnix L M Lybeert, Jan J Jobsen, Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis, Karin A J De Winter, Ludy C H W Lutgens, Alfons C M van den Bergh, Elzbieta van der Steen-Banasik, Henk Beerman, Mat van Lent.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the rates of local control and survival after relapse in patients with stage I endometrial cancer treated in the multicenter randomized PORTEC trial.
METHODS: The PORTEC trial included 715 patients with stage 1 endometrial cancer, either grade 1 or 2 with deep (>50%) myometrial invasion or grade 2 or 3 with <50% invasion. In all cases an abdominal hysterectomy was performed, without lymphadenectomy. After surgery, patients were randomized to receive pelvic RT (46 Gy) or no further treatment.
RESULTS: The analysis was done by intention-to-treat. A total of 714 patients were evaluated. At a median follow-up of 73 months, 8-year actuarial locoregional recurrence rates were 4% in the RT group and 15% in the control group (P < 0.0001). The 8-year actuarial overall survival rates were 71 (RT group) and 77% (control group, P = 0.18). Eight-year rates of distant metastases were 10 and 6% (P = 0.20). The majority of the locoregional relapses were located in the vagina, mainly in the vaginal vault. Of the 39 patients with isolated vaginal relapse, 35 (87%) were treated with curative intent, usually with external RT and brachytherapy, and surgery in some. A complete remission (CR) was obtained in 31 of the 35 patients (89%), and 24 patients (77%) were still in CR after further follow-up. Five patients subsequently developed distant metastases, and 2 had a second vaginal recurrence. The 3-year survival after first relapse was 51% for patients in the control group and 19% in the RT group (P = 0.004). The 3-year survival after vaginal relapse was 73%, in contrast to 8 and 14% after pelvic and distant relapse (P < 0.001). At 5 years, the survival after vaginal relapse was 65% in the control group compared to 43% in the RT group.
CONCLUSION: Survival after relapse was significantly better in the patient group without previous RT. Treatment for vaginal relapse was effective, with 89% CR and 65% 5-year survival in the control group, while there was no difference in survival between patients with pelvic relapse and those with distant metastases. As pelvic RT was shown to improve locoregional control significantly, but without a survival benefit, its use should be limited to those patients at sufficiently high risk (15% or over) for recurrence in order to maximize local control and relapse-free survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12713981     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00126-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  57 in total

1.  Current status in the management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Nan-Hee Jeong; Jong-Min Lee; Seon-Kyung Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  The role of HE4 in endometrial cancer recurrence: how to choose the optimal follow-up program.

Authors:  Roberto Angioli; Stella Capriglione; Giuseppe Scaletta; Alessia Aloisi; Andrea Miranda; Carlo De Cicco Nardone; Corrado Terranova; Francesco Plotti
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-11-03

3.  Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer in India.

Authors:  Vikash Mahajan
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-16

4.  Trends in the utilization of adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy and/or external beam radiation treatment in stage I and II endometrial cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results study.

Authors:  Mehul K Patel; Michele L Cote; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Thomas Buekers; Adnan R Munkarah; Mohamed A Elshaikh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  LRG1 is an independent prognostic factor for endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Shan-Yun Wen; Li-Na Zhang; Xiao-Mei Yang; Yan-Li Zhang; Li Ma; Qiu-Lin Ge; Shu-Heng Jiang; Xiao-Lu Zhu; Wei Xu; Wen-Jing Ding; Bing-Qing Yang; Zhi-Gang Zhang; Yin-Cheng Teng
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-24

6.  Surgical and systemic management of endometrial cancer: an international survey.

Authors:  Christina Fotopoulou; Robert Kraetschell; Sean Dowdy; Keiichi Fujiwara; Nobuo Yaegashi; Domenica Larusso; Antonio Casado; Sven Mahner; Thomas J Herzog; Sean Kehoe; Ignace Vergote; David Scott Miller; Christian Marth; Shingo Fujii; Jalid Sehouli
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  MR- versus CT-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sophia C Kamran; Matthias M Manuel; Paul Catalano; Linda Cho; Antonio L Damato; Larissa J Lee; Ehud J Schmidt; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Hematogenous metastases in patients with Stage I or II endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Paweł Blecharz; Krzysztof Urbański; Anna Mucha-Małecka; Krzysztof Małecki; Marian Reinfuss; Jerzy Jakubowicz; Piotr Skotnicki
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Controversies in the management of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Jian Wang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-22

10.  A tool to balance benefit and harm when deciding about adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  A M Knops; A Goossens; M P M Burger; L J A Stalpers; D T Ubbink
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.