A Greer1, J A Buxton2, B Pauly3, V Bungay4. 1. School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. Alissa_greer@sfu.ca. 2. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. 3. School of Nursing, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada. 4. School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The inclusion of people with lived and living experience of substance use is essential to effective and client-centered harm reduction services and strategies. The aim of this study is to critically examine and characterize peer worker roles and the definition, recognition, and support for these roles within harm reduction organizations. METHODS: Fifteen interviews were conducted with peer workers-people with lived and living experience of substance use engaged in harm reduction service delivery-in British Columbia, Canada. An interpretive descriptive approach to data analysis was used to generate themes that best illustrated the roles of peer workers. FINDINGS: Two interrelated and overarching themes are presented: (1) peer work in practice; (2) organizational support. Our findings illustrate that peer work is incredibly complex and demanding, requiring peers to be at the forefront of support within their communities while simultaneously navigating the oppressive structures within which they work. While peer workers found a high degree of purpose and meaning in their day-to-day work, their roles lacked definition within organizations, which produced feelings of ineffectiveness and being undervalued. A lack of organizational understanding and recognition of their roles was evident from unclear "peer" role titles, a lack of role communication and expectations, the representation of experiential knowledge, and a lack of role support and training. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may help harm reduction organizations understand peer work and worker roles which may inform and promote equity in future harm reduction initiatives that include people with living and lived experience of substance use.
BACKGROUND: The inclusion of people with lived and living experience of substance use is essential to effective and client-centered harm reduction services and strategies. The aim of this study is to critically examine and characterize peer worker roles and the definition, recognition, and support for these roles within harm reduction organizations. METHODS: Fifteen interviews were conducted with peer workers-people with lived and living experience of substance use engaged in harm reduction service delivery-in British Columbia, Canada. An interpretive descriptive approach to data analysis was used to generate themes that best illustrated the roles of peer workers. FINDINGS: Two interrelated and overarching themes are presented: (1) peer work in practice; (2) organizational support. Our findings illustrate that peer work is incredibly complex and demanding, requiring peers to be at the forefront of support within their communities while simultaneously navigating the oppressive structures within which they work. While peer workers found a high degree of purpose and meaning in their day-to-day work, their roles lacked definition within organizations, which produced feelings of ineffectiveness and being undervalued. A lack of organizational understanding and recognition of their roles was evident from unclear "peer" role titles, a lack of role communication and expectations, the representation of experiential knowledge, and a lack of role support and training. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may help harm reduction organizations understand peer work and worker roles which may inform and promote equity in future harm reduction initiatives that include people with living and lived experience of substance use.
Entities:
Keywords:
Harm reduction work; Organizational support; Overdose prevention; Peer engagement; Peer work; People with lived and living experience; Service roles
Authors: Samuel R Friedman; Wouter de Jong; Diana Rossi; Graciela Touzé; Russell Rockwell; Don C Des Jarlais; Richard Elovich Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2006-12-28
Authors: Mary Clare Kennedy; Jade Boyd; Samara Mayer; Alexandra Collins; Thomas Kerr; Ryan McNeil Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2019-02-10 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Bernadette Bernie Pauly; Zahra Mamdani; Lacey Mesley; Sophie McKenzie; Fred Cameron; Denice Edwards; Amy Howell; Michael Knott; Tracy Scott; Ryan Seguin; Alissa M Greer; Jane A Buxton Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2020-11-09
Authors: Karla D Wagner; Peter J Davidson; Ellen Iverson; Rachel Washburn; Emily Burke; Alex H Kral; Miles McNeeley; Jennifer Jackson Bloom; Stephen E Lankenau Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2013-08-09
Authors: Zahra Mamdani; Sophie McKenzie; Bernadette Pauly; Fred Cameron; Jennifer Conway-Brown; Denice Edwards; Amy Howell; Tracy Scott; Ryan Seguin; Peter Woodrow; Jane A Buxton Journal: Harm Reduct J Date: 2021-02-11
Authors: Fiona Mercer; Joanna Astrid Miler; Bernie Pauly; Hannah Carver; Kristina Hnízdilová; Rebecca Foster; Tessa Parkes Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Zahra Mamdani; Damian Feldman-Kiss; Sophie McKenzie; Mike Knott; Fred Cameron; Rayne Voyer; Jessica van Norren; Tracy Scott; Bernie Pauly; Jane A Buxton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 3.752