Preeti Dhuria1, Wendy Lawrence2,3, Sarah Crozier2, Cyrus Cooper2,3, Janis Baird2,3, Christina Vogel2,3. 1. Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. pd@mrc.soton.ac.uk. 2. Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. 3. National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine women's perceptions of factors that influence their food shopping choices, particularly in relation to store layout, and their views on ways that supermarkets could support healthier choices. DESIGN: This qualitative cross-sectional study used semi-structured telephone interviews to ask participants the reasons for their choice of supermarket and factors in-store that prompted their food selections. The actions supermarkets, governments and customers could take to encourage healthier food choices were explored with women. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes. SETTING: Six supermarkets across England. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty women customers aged 18-45 years. RESULTS: Participants had a median age of 39.5 years (IQR: 35.1, 42.3), a median weekly grocery spend of £70 (IQR: 50, 88), and 44% had left school aged 16 years. Women reported that achieving value for money, feeling hungry, tired, or stressed, and meeting family members' food preferences influenced their food shopping choices. The physical environment was important, including product quality and variety, plus ease of accessing the store or products in-store. Many participants described how they made unintended food selections as a result of prominent placement of unhealthy products in supermarkets, even if they adopted more conscious approaches to food shopping (i.e. written or mental lists). Participants described healthy eating as a personal responsibility, but some stated that governments and supermarkets could be more supportive. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted that in-store environments can undermine intentions to purchase and consume healthy foods. Creating healthier supermarket environments could reduce the burden of personal responsibility for healthy eating, by making healthier choices easier. Future research could explore the interplay of personal, societal and commercial responsibility for food choices and health status.
OBJECTIVES: To examine women's perceptions of factors that influence their food shopping choices, particularly in relation to store layout, and their views on ways that supermarkets could support healthier choices. DESIGN: This qualitative cross-sectional study used semi-structured telephone interviews to ask participants the reasons for their choice of supermarket and factors in-store that prompted their food selections. The actions supermarkets, governments and customers could take to encourage healthier food choices were explored with women. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes. SETTING: Six supermarkets across England. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty women customers aged 18-45 years. RESULTS: Participants had a median age of 39.5 years (IQR: 35.1, 42.3), a median weekly grocery spend of £70 (IQR: 50, 88), and 44% had left school aged 16 years. Women reported that achieving value for money, feeling hungry, tired, or stressed, and meeting family members' food preferences influenced their food shopping choices. The physical environment was important, including product quality and variety, plus ease of accessing the store or products in-store. Many participants described how they made unintended food selections as a result of prominent placement of unhealthy products in supermarkets, even if they adopted more conscious approaches to food shopping (i.e. written or mental lists). Participants described healthy eating as a personal responsibility, but some stated that governments and supermarkets could be more supportive. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted that in-store environments can undermine intentions to purchase and consume healthy foods. Creating healthier supermarket environments could reduce the burden of personal responsibility for healthy eating, by making healthier choices easier. Future research could explore the interplay of personal, societal and commercial responsibility for food choices and health status.
Entities:
Keywords:
Food shopping choices; Qualitative methods; Supermarket; Women
Authors: Mary Barker; Stephan U Dombrowski; Tim Colbourn; Caroline H D Fall; Natasha M Kriznik; Wendy T Lawrence; Shane A Norris; Gloria Ngaiza; Dilisha Patel; Jolene Skordis-Worrall; Falko F Sniehotta; Régine Steegers-Theunissen; Christina Vogel; Kathryn Woods-Townsend; Judith Stephenson Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lise L Winkler; Ulla Christensen; Charlotte Glümer; Paul Bloch; Bent E Mikkelsen; Brian Wansink; Ulla Toft Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Christina Vogel; Georgia Ntani; Hazel Inskip; Mary Barker; Steven Cummins; Cyrus Cooper; Graham Moon; Janis Baird Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Christina Black; Georgia Ntani; Ross Kenny; Tannaze Tinati; Megan Jarman; Wendy Lawrence; Mary Barker; Hazel Inskip; Cyrus Cooper; Graham Moon; Janis Baird Journal: Health Place Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 4.078