| Literature DB >> 34089438 |
Feng Xie1,2,3, Zheng Huang2,3,4, Zhengjin Shi1, Tianyu Wang1,2,3, Guoli Song5,6, Bolun Wang1,2,3, Zihong Liu1,2,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The global health crisis caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a common threat facing all humankind. In the process of diagnosing COVID-19 and treating patients, automatic COVID-19 lesion segmentation from computed tomography images helps doctors and patients intuitively understand lung infection. To effectively quantify lung infections, a convolutional neural network for automatic lung infection segmentation based on deep learning is proposed.Entities:
Keywords: Attention mechanism; Deep learning; Lesion segmentation; Medical image analysis; U-Net
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34089438 PMCID: PMC8178668 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02418-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg ISSN: 1861-6410 Impact factor: 2.924
Fig. 1Images in the CT dataset. Lung consolidation is marked in purple
Fig. 2DUDA-Net structure
Fig. 3Structure diagram of the DCA blocks
Fig. 4Schematic diagram of the convolution receptive fields: a 3 × 3 convolution; b 3 × 3 dilated convolution, rate = 2; and c 3 × 3 dilated convolution, with rate = 4
Results of different loss function experiments
| Loss | DSC | IoU | ACC | SEN | SPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCE | 79.33% | 65.75% | 79.32% | 99.56% | |
| BCE | 79.51% | 66.04% | 99.07% | 88.55% | 99.21% |
| DL | 86.58% | 76.35% | 99.05% | 86.56% | 99.72% |
| GDL | 85.00% | 74.26% | 98.98% | 79.27% | |
| 99.06% | 99.59% |
The bold figures in Table are the optimal performance
Fig. 5Results of the ablation experiment: a DUDA-Net without coarse segmentation, b DUDA-Net without DCA blocks and c DUDA-Net
Fig. 6ROC curve of the ablation experiment and the AUC indicator: a DUDA-Net without coarse segmentation, b DUDA-Net without DCA blocks and c DUDA-Net
Fig. 7Prediction results of the ablation experiment: a the CT image, b the ground truth, c the results of DUDA-Net without coarse segmentation, d the results of DUDA-Net without DCA blocks and e the results of DUDA-Net
Results of different typical models
| Method | DSC | IoU | ACC | SEN | SPE | Testing time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCN [ | 52.96% | 36.55% | 98.12% | 44.71% | 99.62% | 6.85 s |
| U-Net [ | 59.81% | 42.90% | 98.29% | 51.97% | 99.65% | 7.54 s |
| U-Net + + [ | 69.98% | 54.51% | 98.46% | 65.74% | 99.74% | 9.99 s |
| BCDU-Net [ | 79.29% | 65.69% | 98.94% | 90.78% | 99.64% | 11.29 s |
| RCA-U-Net [ | 82.60% | 70.42% | 99.03% | 77.79% | 10.42 s | |
| 99.59% | 16.51 s |
The bold figures in Table are the optimal performance
Fig. 8Prediction results of each model
Fig. 9Heat map of the DUDA-Net results
Comparison of DUDA-Net and several existing works
| References | Years | Method | DSC | IoU | SEN | SPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhou et al. [ | 2020 | U-Net using an attention mechanism | 83.1% | – | 86.7% | 99.3% |
| Omar et al. [ | 2020 | Region of interest extraction segmentation network | 78.6% | – | 71.1% | 99.3% |
| Qiu et al | 2020 | MiniSeg segmentation network | 77.28% | 83.62% | 97.42% | |
| 2021 | DUDA-Net | 77.09% |
The bold figures in Table are the optimal performance