Literature DB >> 34089358

Barriers to medication adherence and degree of nonadherence in a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) outpatient population.

Courtney Hardy1,2, Dafna D Gladman3,2, Jiandong Su3,2, Nathalie Rozenbojm3,2, Murray B Urowitz4,5.   

Abstract

To estimate the level of medication adherence and barriers to adherence among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Patients taking antimalarials, immunosuppressives, and/or steroids to treat SLE were included. Adherence was measured using the Medication Adherence Self Report Inventory (MASRI) and adherence rates < 80% were considered nonadherent while rates ≥ 80% sufficiently adherent. Pill counts were conducted in a proportion of participants. Barriers to adherence were identified using the Identification of Medication Adherence Barriers Questionnaire 30 (IMAB-Q 30). Associations between adherence and patient demographics and disease-specific characteristics were explored. A total of 94 patients were studied and 28 pill counts conducted. 10 patients were classified as nonadherent and 84 patients as sufficiently adherent. 46% of patients were taking steroids, 77.7% antimalarials, and 55.3% immunosuppressives. 88% of patients were taking ≥ 1 medication for non-SLE conditions. The mean medication adherence rate for the SLE patients was 90.7%. Important barriers to adherence reported by nonadherent patients were: concern about harmful side effects (50%), being easily distracted (50%), life getting in the way (50%), being unsure or disagreeing that their condition will worsen without medications (50%), and having personal reasons for not taking medications (50%). Non-adherent patients reported significantly more barriers than sufficiently adherent patients (p < 0.001). The adherence rate in our population was higher than expected, reaching 90%. Barriers to medication adherence were identified and should be addressed on a population and individualized basis to improve patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Barriers; Compliance; Systemic lupus erythematosus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34089358     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04898-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  4 in total

1.  Real-world data on vitamin D supplementation and its impacts in systemic lupus erythematosus: Cross-sectional analysis of a lupus registry of nationwide institutions (LUNA).

Authors:  Keigo Hayashi; Ken-Ei Sada; Yosuke Asano; Yu Katayama; Keiji Ohashi; Michiko Morishita; Yoshia Miyawaki; Haruki Watanabe; Takayuki Katsuyama; Mariko Narazaki; Yoshinori Matsumoto; Nobuyuki Yajima; Ryusuke Yoshimi; Yasuhiro Shimojima; Shigeru Ohno; Hiroshi Kajiyama; Kunihiro Ichinose; Shuzo Sato; Michio Fujiwara; Jun Wada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Post-traumatic growth in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Rong Xu; Qianqian Yan; Zuocheng Xu; Xianming Long; Rulan Yin
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.580

3.  COVID-19 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review.

Authors:  Xue-Lei Fu; Yan Qian; Xiao-Hong Jin; Hai-Rong Yu; Lin Du; Hua Wu; Hong-Lin Chen; Ya-Qin Shi
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.858

Review 4.  Health disparities in systemic lupus erythematosus-a narrative review.

Authors:  Bilal Hasan; Alice Fike; Sarfaraz Hasni
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 3.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.