Alberto Martini1, Filippo Turri2, Ravi Barod3, Bernardo Rocco2, Umberto Capitanio1, Alberto Briganti1, Francesco Montorsi1, Alexandre Mottrie4, Ben Challacombe5, Brunolf W Lagerveld6, Karim Bensalah7, Ronney Abaza8, Ketan K Badani9, Reza Mehrazin9, Maurizio Buscarini10, Alessandro Larcher11. 1. Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. 2. Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Urological Residency School Network, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. 3. Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. 4. Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium. 5. Department of Urology, Guys and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 6. Department of Urology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France. 8. Robotic Urologic Surgery, OhioHealth Dublin Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. 9. Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 10. Department of Urology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. 11. Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: alelarcher@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Salvage treatment for local recurrence after prior partial nephrectomy (PN) or local tumor ablation (LTA) for kidney cancer is, as of yet, poorly investigated. OBJECTIVE: To classify the treatments and standardize the nomenclature of salvage robot-assisted renal surgery, to describe the surgical technique for each scenario, and to investigate complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-seven patients underwent salvage robot-assisted renal surgery from October 2010 to December 2020 at nine tertiary referral centers. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Salvage robot-assisted renal surgery classified according to treatment type as salvage robot-assisted partial or radical nephrectomy (sRAPN or sRARN) and according to previous primary treatment (PN or LTA). MEASUREMENTS: Postoperative complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 32 and 35 patients underwent salvage robotic surgery following PN and LTA, respectively. After prior PN, two patients underwent sRAPN, while ten underwent sRARN for a metachronous recurrence in the same kidney. No intra- or perioperative complication occurred. For local recurrence in the resection bed, six patients underwent sRAPN, while 14 underwent sRARN. For sRAPN, the intraoperative complication rate was 33%; there was no postoperative complication. For sRARN, there was no intraoperative complication and the postoperative complication rate was 7%. At 3 yr, the local recurrence-free rates were 64% and 82% for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively, while the 3-yr metastasis-free rates were 80% and 79%, respectively. At 33 mo, the median estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were 57 and 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively. After prior LTA, 35 patients underwent sRAPN and no patient underwent sRARN. There was no intraoperative complication; the overall postoperative complications rate was 20%. No local recurrence occurred. The 3-yr metastasis-free rate was 90%. At 43 mo, the median eGFR was 38 ml/min/1.73 m2. The main limitations are the relatively small population and the noncomparative design of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage robot-assisted surgery has a safe complication profile in the hands of experienced surgeons at high-volume institutions, but the risk of local recurrence in this setting is non-negligible. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with local recurrence after partial nephrectomy or local tumor ablation should be aware that further treatment with robot-assisted surgery is not associated with a worrisome complication profile, but also that they are at risk of further recurrence.
BACKGROUND: Salvage treatment for local recurrence after prior partial nephrectomy (PN) or local tumor ablation (LTA) for kidney cancer is, as of yet, poorly investigated. OBJECTIVE: To classify the treatments and standardize the nomenclature of salvage robot-assisted renal surgery, to describe the surgical technique for each scenario, and to investigate complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-seven patients underwent salvage robot-assisted renal surgery from October 2010 to December 2020 at nine tertiary referral centers. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Salvage robot-assisted renal surgery classified according to treatment type as salvage robot-assisted partial or radical nephrectomy (sRAPN or sRARN) and according to previous primary treatment (PN or LTA). MEASUREMENTS: Postoperative complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 32 and 35 patients underwent salvage robotic surgery following PN and LTA, respectively. After prior PN, two patients underwent sRAPN, while ten underwent sRARN for a metachronous recurrence in the same kidney. No intra- or perioperative complication occurred. For local recurrence in the resection bed, six patients underwent sRAPN, while 14 underwent sRARN. For sRAPN, the intraoperative complication rate was 33%; there was no postoperative complication. For sRARN, there was no intraoperative complication and the postoperative complication rate was 7%. At 3 yr, the local recurrence-free rates were 64% and 82% for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively, while the 3-yr metastasis-free rates were 80% and 79%, respectively. At 33 mo, the median estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were 57 and 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively. After prior LTA, 35 patients underwent sRAPN and no patient underwent sRARN. There was no intraoperative complication; the overall postoperative complications rate was 20%. No local recurrence occurred. The 3-yr metastasis-free rate was 90%. At 43 mo, the median eGFR was 38 ml/min/1.73 m2. The main limitations are the relatively small population and the noncomparative design of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage robot-assisted surgery has a safe complication profile in the hands of experienced surgeons at high-volume institutions, but the risk of local recurrence in this setting is non-negligible. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with local recurrence after partial nephrectomy or local tumor ablation should be aware that further treatment with robot-assisted surgery is not associated with a worrisome complication profile, but also that they are at risk of further recurrence.