Literature DB >> 34087745

Non-abstinent treatment outcomes for cannabis use disorder.

Frances R Levin1, John J Mariani2, C Jean Choi3, Cale Basaraba3, Daniel J Brooks4, Christina A Brezing2, Martina Pavlicova5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abstinence remains a standard outcome for potential treatment interventions for Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD). However, there needs to be validation of non-abstinent outcomes. This study explores reductions in self-reported days of use as another viable outcome measure using data from three completed randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for CUD.
METHODS: The three trials tested the effect of quetiapine (QTP, n = 113); dronabinol (DRO, n = 156); and lofexidine + dronabinol (LFD, n = 122). Self-reported cannabis use was categorized into three use-groups/week: heavy (5-7 days/week), moderate (2-4 days/week) and light use (0-1 days/week). Multinomial logistic regressions analyzed the treatment by time effect on the likelihood of light and moderate use compared to heavy use in each study.
RESULTS: Across the three trials, there was no significant overall time-by-treatment interaction (QTP: p = .06; DRO: p = .15; LFD: p = .21). However, the odds of moderate compared to heavy use were significantly higher in treatment than in placebo groups starting around the midpoint of each trial. No treatment differences were found between the odds of light compared to heavy use.
CONCLUSIONS: While study-end abstinence rates have been a standard treatment outcome for CUD trials, reduction from heavy to moderate use has not been standardly assessed. During the last several weeks of each trial, those on active medication were more likely to move from heavy to moderate use, which suggests that certain medications may be more impactful than previously assessed. Future studies should determine if this pattern is associated with less CUD severity and/or improved quality of life.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cannabis use disorder; Outcomes; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34087745      PMCID: PMC8282674          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.852


  35 in total

Review 1.  The state of clinical outcome assessments for cannabis use disorder clinical trials: A review and research agenda.

Authors:  Mallory J E Loflin; Brian D Kiluk; Marilyn A Huestis; Will M Aklin; Alan J Budney; Kathleen M Carroll; Deepak Cyril D'Souza; Robert H Dworkin; Kevin M Gray; Deborah S Hasin; Dustin C Lee; Bernard Le Foll; Frances R Levin; Joshua A Lile; Barbara J Mason; Aimee L McRae-Clark; Ivan Montoya; Erica N Peters; Tatiana Ramey; Dennis C Turk; Ryan Vandrey; Roger D Weiss; Eric C Strain
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 2.  Problems with the identification of 'problematic' cannabis use: examining the issues of frequency, quantity, and drug use environment.

Authors:  Mark Asbridge; Cameron Duff; David C Marsh; Patricia G Erickson
Journal:  Eur Addict Res       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  A randomized placebo-controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine for cannabis use disorder in adults.

Authors:  Kevin M Gray; Susan C Sonne; Erin A McClure; Udi E Ghitza; Abigail G Matthews; Aimee L McRae-Clark; Kathleen M Carroll; Jennifer S Potter; Katharina Wiest; Larissa J Mooney; Albert Hasson; Sharon L Walsh; Michelle R Lofwall; Shanna Babalonis; Robert W Lindblad; Steven Sparenborg; Aimee Wahle; Jacqueline S King; Nathaniel L Baker; Rachel L Tomko; Louise F Haynes; Ryan G Vandrey; Frances R Levin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  A double-blind randomized controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine in cannabis-dependent adolescents.

Authors:  Kevin M Gray; Matthew J Carpenter; Nathaniel L Baker; Stacia M DeSantis; Elisabeth Kryway; Karen J Hartwell; Aimee L McRae-Clark; Kathleen T Brady
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Posttreatment low-risk drinking as a predictor of future drinking and problem outcomes among individuals with alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Andrea H Kline-Simon; Daniel E Falk; Raye Z Litten; Jennifer R Mertens; Joanne Fertig; Megan Ryan; Constance M Weisner
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Buspirone treatment of cannabis dependence: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Aimee L McRae-Clark; Nathaniel L Baker; Kevin M Gray; Therese K Killeen; Amanda M Wagner; Kathleen T Brady; C Lindsay DeVane; Jessica Norton
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Open-label pilot study of quetiapine treatment for cannabis dependence.

Authors:  John J Mariani; Martina Pavlicova; Agnieszka K Mamczur; Adam Bisaga; Edward V Nunes; Frances R Levin
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 8.  Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.

Authors:  Peter J Gates; Pamela Sabioni; Jan Copeland; Bernard Le Foll; Linda Gowing
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-05

Review 9.  Quetiapine: preclinical studies, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and dosing.

Authors:  Charles B Nemeroff; Becky Kinkead; Jeffrey Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Pharmacotherapies for cannabis dependence.

Authors:  Suzanne Nielsen; Linda Gowing; Pamela Sabioni; Bernard Le Foll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-28
View more
  1 in total

1.  Characterizing cannabis use reduction and change in functioning during treatment: Initial steps on the path to new clinical endpoints.

Authors:  Jacob T Borodovsky; Michael J Sofis; Brian J Sherman; Kevin M Gray; Alan J Budney
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2022-01-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.