Literature DB >> 34084500

Interstitial 20p13 microdeletion including PRNP and adjacent genes in a fetus with congenital abnormalities-First case report.

Pelin Onur1, Mary Shaver1, Mohammed Anwaruddin Iqbal1.   

Abstract

We present a prenatal case with congenital anomalies that revealed a 759 kb microdeletion at 20p13 possibly implicating PRNP and adjacent genes.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMA; PRNP deletion; abnormal ultrasound; prenatal

Year:  2021        PMID: 34084500      PMCID: PMC8142463          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.4082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


INTRODUCTION

PRNP is mainly expressed in the central and peripheral nervous system. We report a fetus with congenital anomalies with 20p13 deletion encompassing PRNP and adjacent genes, and 116 Kb gain was found at 22q.11.21. PRNP and adjacent genes have a possible role in congenital abnormalities. Prion proteins are encoded by PRNP which is located at 20p13. About 15% of prion diseases are considered to be related to genetic mutations of PRNP. The PRNP gene has two exons and the open reading frame is located in exon two. It is expressed broadly, almost ubiquitously, though enriched in the CNS. Coding mutations in PRNP are associated with prion disease by resulting in misfolded prion proteins. While the normal function of the nonpathogenic (cellular) form of prion protein (PrPC) is unknown, the pathogenic form (PrPSc) has a propensity to accumulate ). Mutations identified in PRNP are missense, nonsense, and insertions or a deletion. More than 30 mutations in the PRNP have been identified in people with familial forms of prion disease , . It is reported that the loss of PRNP function does not play a major role in the etiology of prion disease. , In other organisms like mice and zebrafish, PRNP is not required for normal developmental process.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

We present a fetus with congenital anomalies including bilateral clubbed feet, rocker‐bottom feet, and absent cavum septum pellucidum as well as intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) identified at 29‐week in a 21‐year‐old pregnant woman (G4P2A1). The parturient had a history of ADHD, bipolar disorder, chronic depression, smoking, and use of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) during pregnancy. It was also reported that she was taking psychiatric medication which she stopped after finding out that she was pregnant. She had an uncomplicated C‐section at 37w0d. APGARS scores were 9 at 1 minute, 9 at 5 minutes. The baby was born active, pink, and vigorous. She did not require any interventions in the delivery room. Neonatal evaluation revealed that the baby was small for gestational age. Her birth weight was 1.810 kg (0.3 percentile), length was 41.0 cm (0.1 percentile), and head circumference was 33.0 cm (39. 7 percentile). Her left foot had a rocker‐bottom appearance with dorsal deviation. Additionally, her right foot was dorsiflexed with resistance to extension of the ankle. No cardiac or respiratory abnormalities were seen and neurologic reflexes including Moro, pupillary, fair suck were normal. Cranial ultrasound findings revealed enlargement of the lateral ventricles (ventriculomegaly) with absence of septum pellucidum. Cranial/orbit MRI revealed septo‐optic dysplasia with partial agenesis of the corpus callosum.

METHODS

Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

For CMA analysis, DNA was extracted from amniotic fluid using QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit (Cat #51106). The DNA concentration was determined by using Nanodrop ND‐2000 spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). CMA experiments were performed on SurePrint G3 ISCA CGH + SNP Microarray Kit, 4x180K v2.0 platform (Agilent Technologies), featuring approximately 110 715 custom oligonucleotides + 59 647 SNPs (60 mers) and covering 1282 ISCA regions, resulting in a 25.3 Kb resolution. As per the manufacturer's recommendations, DNA of the patient was referenced against Agilent Human Reference DNA female (5190‐4370/4371) using Agilent's SureTag Complete DNA labeling Kit (Cat # 5190‐4240). Patient's data were scanned (Agilent Model #G2505C) at 3µm resolution and visualized (Cytogenomics software) with log2 threshold ratios of −0.25 for losses and 0.25 for gains. The BAC probe (RP11‐960N2, spectrum orange) and control probe (TelVysion 20p, spectrum green) were labeled according to the manufacturer's instructions (Cat #05J03‐030, Abbott Laboratories). The manufacturer's instructions and standard protocols were followed for hybridization. Slides were analyzed using a Nikon (Eclipse 80i) fluorescence microscope attached with a CCD camera. For image acquisition and analyses, Applied Spectral Imaging (ASI) software was used. Ten metaphase and 100 interphase cells were analyzed for confirmation of CMA findings.

RESULTS

Amniotic fluid cytogenetic analysis revealed a normal 46,XX karyotype by G‐banding technique. Follow‐up CMA on cultured cells showed a 759 Kb heterozygous loss at 20p13 and a 116 Kb gain at 22q.11.21. The array and FISH result: ish del(20)(p13p13)(RP11‐960N2)[10/10],dup(22)(q11.21q11.21)(PRODH++)[10/10].arr[GRCh37/hg19] 20p13(4,018,739x2,4,053,819‐4,813,038x1,4,834,291x2),22q11.21(18,877,583x2,18,894,835‐19,010,508x3,19,036,997x2). The loss at 20p13 encompassed PRNP, SMOX (Spermine Oxidase) ADRA1D (Alpha‐1‐adrenergic receptors); PRND (Prion Like Protein Doppel); RASSF2 (Ras Association Domain Family Member 2); LINC01433 (Long Intergenic Non‐Protein Coding RNA 1433); and PRNT (Prion Locus LncRNA, Testis Expressed). The gain of 116 Kb at 22q.11.21 included DGCR6, PRODH, and DGCR5. FISH analysis on 10 metaphase and 100 interphase cells confirmed the 20p13 deletion (Figure 1A,B,C). Parental samples were not available to determine the nature and origin of 20p13 deletion and 22q11.21 duplication. No follow‐up information on child's development is available.
FIGURE 1

A, Chromosome view of chromosome 20 showing the deletion in the 20p13 region. B, Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmation of CMA finding, (RP11‐960N2 [20p13] BAC probe, Spectrum Orange; TelVysion 20p [control], Spectrum Green). C, Log2 ratio of deletion in 20p13

A, Chromosome view of chromosome 20 showing the deletion in the 20p13 region. B, Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmation of CMA finding, (RP11‐960N2 [20p13] BAC probe, Spectrum Orange; TelVysion 20p [control], Spectrum Green). C, Log2 ratio of deletion in 20p13

DISCUSSION

We performed a database review in DECIPHER (Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources) and ClinGen. The criteria used for the database search was to match the exact deletion of our case ‐ 20p13 (4,018,739x2,4,053,819‐4,813,038x1,4,834,291x2). Complete PRNP deletions have rarely been reported in these databases. In ClinGen (https://clinicalgenome.org/) one partial deletion was found (nssv1495051). In DECIPHER (https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk/), two deletions were found (ID numbers: 332440, 366633). We also did a literature review in PubMed for “prenatal prion” or “PRNP deletion” as search terms, however, we could not find cases similar to the one in this report. The DECIPHER cases showed 20p13 deletion overlapping approximately 21% with our case encompassing PRNP, PRND, and PRNT (Size 159.37 Kb; Coordinates: GRCh38: 4,638,741‐4,798,107x1). Both these cases are siblings from a single family with autistic behavior and global developmental delay, inheritance unknown (personal communication from DECIPHER). Demonstrated in PrP‐null mice hippocampal slices a weakened GABAA (gamma‐aminobutyric acid type A) receptor‐mediated fast inhibition and impaired long‐term potentiation. Based on this, the authors argued that a loss of function of PrPC may contribute to the early synaptic loss and neuronal degeneration typically found in Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease. Miranda et al studied mouse embryonic stem cells (ESC) in order to identify the role of PRNP in stem cell differentiation. The functionality of PRNP in mouse Prnp‐null (KO) and WT embryonic stem cell (ESC) lines was examined during the embryonic body differentiation. They revealed a relationship between PRNP and several key pluripotency genes such as Nanog and Oct3/4. Their results provided the evidence that PRNP participates in the self‐renewal/differentiation status of stem cells during early embryogenesis. , Young et al provided strong evidence for the role of prion family proteins in early mouse embryogenesis. They studied a prion‐related protein named Shadoo which has partially overlapping biological properties and brain distribution with the prion protein. They reported that the Shadoo‐encoding gene knockdown in PrnP‐knockout mouse embryos resulted in a lethal phenotype. Their study also explains the important function of these two proteins together in mammalian embryogenesis. Studies with zebrafish have also showed strong findings highlighting the importance of prion protein function in early embryonic development. The amenability of zebrafish to global technologies has generated data indicating the existence of “anchorless” splice variants of PRNP in the early embryo. Nourizadeh‐Lillabadi studied the PRNP2 gene in the zebrafish genome and showed impaired brain and neuronal development in PRNP2 deleted embryos. They also reported apoptosis and high mortality at 24 hours postfertilization in the same embryos. The study suggests that PRNP2 knockdown has an important biological function for the zebrafish in affecting gene networks controlling neurogenesis and embryo development. Interestingly, PRND is also deleted in our case and may have played a role in the congenital abnormalities observed. All of the above studies suggest an important role of PRNP and its close family of genes during embryogenesis. It is also well known that whole‐gene deletions or duplications can be associated with diverse phenotypic abnormalities. It remains to be seen if heterozygous deletion of PRNP and adjacent genes also has an impact in human embryogenesis. Additional similar cases will be helpful in this regard. Our case also revealed a 116 Kb gain at 22q.11.21 encompassing DGCR6, PRODH, and DGCR5. A causal effect of duplications in this region on stand‐alone conotruncal heart defects has been suggested by Gao et al. Our case has a much smaller duplication and is most likely a benign finding. Marijuana exposure during pregnancy has been reported to be associated with low birth weight and preterm delivery. This is also confounded by cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and substance abuse. We have limited information on the type and duration of psychiatric medication exposure to the fetus. It is also possible that several genes included in 20p13 deletion segment may be responsible for the abnormal phenotype in our case.

CONCLUSION

We have reported the first prenatal case with a 759 Kb heterozygous deletion at 20p13 with congenital abnormalities. Two overlapping cases in DECIPHER with a 159 Kb deletion encompassing PRNP, PRND, and PRNT with autistic behavior and global development delay supports a possible pathogenic role of PRNP and adjacent genes. Future similar cases may support haploinsufficiency of these genes in early embryogenesis.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

PO: wrote the manuscript, MAI: supervised the DNA microarray analysis, interpreted the data, and reviewed the final draft of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  12 in total

Review 1.  The two faces of protein misfolding: gain- and loss-of-function in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Konstanze F Winklhofer; Jörg Tatzelt; Christian Haass
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  The prion or the related Shadoo protein is required for early mouse embryogenesis.

Authors:  Rachel Young; Bruno Passet; Marthe Vilotte; Edmond P Cribiu; Vincent Béringue; Fabienne Le Provost; Hubert Laude; Jean-Luc Vilotte
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 3.  Prion protein biology.

Authors:  S B Prusiner; M R Scott; S J DeArmond; F E Cohen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Prion protein is necessary for normal synaptic function.

Authors:  J Collinge; M A Whittington; K C Sidle; C J Smith; M S Palmer; A R Clarke; J G Jefferys
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Prion gene paralogs are dispensable for early zebrafish development and have nonadditive roles in seizure susceptibility.

Authors:  Patricia L A Leighton; Richard Kanyo; Gavin J Neil; Niall M Pollock; W Ted Allison
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Genetic prion disease: Experience of a rapidly progressive dementia center in the United States and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Leonel T Takada; Mee-Ohk Kim; Ross W Cleveland; Katherine Wong; Sven A Forner; Ignacio Illán Gala; Jamie C Fong; Michael D Geschwind
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.568

7.  Early embryonic gene expression profiling of zebrafish prion protein (Prp2) morphants.

Authors:  Rasoul Nourizadeh-Lillabadi; Jacob Seilø Torgersen; Olav Vestrheim; Melanie König; Peter Aleström; Mohasina Syed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources.

Authors:  Helen V Firth; Shola M Richards; A Paul Bevan; Stephen Clayton; Manuel Corpas; Diana Rajan; Steven Van Vooren; Yves Moreau; Roger M Pettett; Nigel P Carter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  Marijuana Use in Pregnancy: A Review.

Authors:  Rebecca Thompson; Katherine DeJong; Jamie Lo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  DGCR6 at the proximal part of the DiGeorge critical region is involved in conotruncal heart defects.

Authors:  Wenming Gao; Takashi Higaki; Minenori Eguchi-Ishimae; Hidehiko Iwabuki; Zhouying Wu; Eiichi Yamamoto; Hidemi Takata; Masaaki Ohta; Issei Imoto; Eiichi Ishii; Mariko Eguchi
Journal:  Hum Genome Var       Date:  2015-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.