Literature DB >> 3408441

The effect of lesions of cerebellar cortex on retention of the classically conditioned eyeblink response when stimulation of the lateral reticular nucleus is used as the conditioned stimulus.

B J Knowlton1, D G Lavond, R F Thompson.   

Abstract

Ten male albino rabbits were implanted with stimulating electrodes in the lateral reticular nucleus (LRN). These rabbits were given paired classical conditioning training of the nictitating membrane response with stimulation of the LRN as the conditioned stimulus (CS) Each rabbit was given daily training sessions until it consistently made conditioned responses (CRs). Each rabbit then received an aspiration lesion of cerebellar cortex; the ipsilateral anso-paramedian lobule (n = 6), the anterior or central vermis (n = 2), the central vermis and ansiform lobule (n = 1), or the central vermis and paramedian lobule (n = 1). After recovery, these rabbits were again given paired classical conditioning training with LRN stimulation as the CS. The rabbits with anso-paramedian lesions did not retain the CR after the lesion, but were able to relearn it. The rabbits with lesions of the vermis, the vermis and ansiform, or the vermis and paramedian retained the CR after the lesion. These results are contrasted with previous results, which show that after aspiration of the anso-paramedian lobule, the conditioned response is not retained or relearned when stimulation of the dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) is used as a CS. The differences between the mossy fiber outputs of the LRN and DLPN may account for this discrepancy. Different regions of the cerebellum are apparently involved in retention of classically conditioned responses depending on the population of mossy fibers carrying the CS information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3408441     DOI: 10.1016/s0163-1047(88)90274-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neural Biol        ISSN: 0163-1047


  6 in total

1.  Cerebellar cortex lesions prevent acquisition of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  K S Garcia; P M Steele; M D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of paired and unpaired eye-blink conditioning on Purkinje cell morphology.

Authors:  B J Anderson; K Relucio; K Haglund; C Logan; B Knowlton; J Thompson; J E Steinmetz; R F Thompson; W T Greenough
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Medial auditory thalamus inactivation prevents acquisition and retention of eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; Amy Poremba; John H Freeman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Enhancement of delay eyelid conditioning by microcurrent electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex is triggered by the expression of Fos protein in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Ya-Juan Zheng; Yu-Chen Dong; Chao Zhu; Mei-Sheng Zhao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Inactivation of the superior cerebellar peduncle blocks expression but not acquisition of the rabbit's classically conditioned eye-blink response.

Authors:  D J Krupa; R F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A meta-analysis of cerebellar contributions to higher cognition from PET and fMRI studies.

Authors:  Keren-Happuch E; Shen-Hsing Annabel Chen; Moon-Ho Ringo Ho; John E Desmond
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 5.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.