Literature DB >> 18626096

Medial auditory thalamus inactivation prevents acquisition and retention of eyeblink conditioning.

Hunter E Halverson1, Amy Poremba, John H Freeman.   

Abstract

The auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) pathway that is necessary for delay eyeblink conditioning was investigated using reversible inactivation of the medial auditory thalamic nuclei (MATN) consisting of the medial division of the medial geniculate (MGm), suprageniculate (SG), and posterior intralaminar nucleus (PIN). Rats were given saline or muscimol infusions into the MATN contralateral to the trained eye before each of four conditioning sessions with an auditory CS. Rats were then given four additional sessions without infusions to assess savings from the initial training. All rats were then given a retention test with a muscimol infusion followed by a recovery session. Muscimol infusions through cannula placements within 0.5 mm of the MGm prevented acquisition of eyeblink conditioned responses (CRs) and also blocked CR retention. Cannula placements more than 0.5 mm from the MATN did not completely block CR acquisition and had a partial effect on CR retention. The primary and secondary effects of MATN inactivation were examined with 2-deoxy-glucose (2-DG) autoradiography. Differences in 2-DG uptake in the auditory thalamus were consistent with the cannula placements and behavioral results. Differences in 2-DG uptake were found between groups in the ipsilateral auditory cortex, basilar pontine nuclei, and inferior colliculus. Results from this experiment indicate that the MATN contralateral to the trained eye and its projection to the pontine nuclei are necessary for acquisition and retention of eyeblink CRs to an auditory CS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626096      PMCID: PMC2505321          DOI: 10.1101/lm.1002508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  50 in total

1.  The pontine projection from the inferior colliculus in the cat. An experimental anatomical study.

Authors:  K Kawamura
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-09-23       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Conditioning and reversal of short-latency multiple-unit responses in the rabbit medial geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  M Gabriel; S E Saltwick; J D Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Autoradiographic tracing of the cerebellar projections from the lateral reticular nucleus in the cat.

Authors:  H Künzle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1975-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Subcortical storage of Pavlovian conditioning in the rabbit.

Authors:  D A Oakley; I S Russell
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1977-05

5.  Differential development of conditioned unit changes in thalamus and cortex of rat.

Authors:  J F Disterhoft; J Olds
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The search for the engram.

Authors:  R F Thompson
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1976-03

7.  Differential plasticity of morphologically distinct neuron populations in the medical geniculate body of the cat during classical conditioning.

Authors:  D K Ryugo; N M Weinberger
Journal:  Behav Biol       Date:  1978-03

8.  Frequency-specific receptive field plasticity in the medial geniculate body induced by pavlovian fear conditioning is expressed in the anesthetized brain.

Authors:  R C Lennartz; N M Weinberger
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation.

Authors:  P R Solomon; J W Moore
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-12

10.  Acquisition and extinction of a classically conditioned response in hippocampectomized rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

Authors:  L W Schmaltz; J Theios
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1972-05
View more
  23 in total

1.  Multiple sites of extinction for a single learned response.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The impact of hippocampal lesions on trace-eyeblink conditioning and forebrain-cerebellar interactions.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Classical eyeblink conditioning using electrical stimulation of caudal mPFC as conditioned stimulus is dependent on cerebellar interpositus nucleus in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Guang-yan Wu; Juan Yao; Zheng-li Fan; Lang-qian Zhang; Xuan Li; Chuang-dong Zhao; Zhen-hua Zhou; Jian-feng Sui
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Cerebellar Processing Common to Delay and Trace Eyelid Conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; Andrei Khilkevich; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Medial Auditory Thalamus Is Necessary for Expression of Auditory Trace Eyelid Conditioning.

Authors:  Loren C Hoffmann; S James Zara; Evan D DeLord; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Associative plasticity in the medial auditory thalamus and cerebellar interpositus nucleus during eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; Inah Lee; John H Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Amygdala central nucleus modulation of cerebellar learning with a visual conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Sean J Farley; Heba Albazboz; Benjamin J De Corte; Jason J Radley; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Ontogenetic change in the auditory conditioned stimulus pathway for eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Matthew M Campolattaro
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Medial auditory thalamic input to the lateral pontine nuclei is necessary for auditory eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Stimulation of the lateral geniculate, superior colliculus, or visual cortex is sufficient for eyeblink conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; Erin M Hubbard; John H Freeman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.