| Literature DB >> 34080336 |
Marta Alonso-Fernandez-Gatta1,2,3, Ana Martin-Garcia1,2,4,5, Maria Diez-Campelo2,4,6, Agustin C Martin-Garcia1,2,4,5, Manuel Barreiro-Pérez1,2,4,5, Félix Lopez-Cadenas2,6, Elena Diaz-Pelaez1,2,4,5, Pedro L Sanchez1,2,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myocardial deformation with echocardiography allows early detection of systolic dysfunction and is related to myocardial iron overload (MIO) determined by T2* in hereditary anemias under transfusion support. Our aim was to analyze the diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of magnetic resonance feature tracking (MR-FT) myocardial strain in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) patients.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance; Feature tracking; Iron overload; Myelodysplastic syndrome; Myocardial deformation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34080336 PMCID: PMC8592675 DOI: 10.4250/jcvi.2020.0216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Imaging
Figure 1Measurement of LV-GLS feature tracking.
Post-processing cine steady-state free precession images to obtain LV-GLS from the average of three standard long-axis views.
Abbreviations: LV-GLS=left ventricular global longitudinal strain.
Baseline characteristics, hematological and cardiac situation at inclusion (n = 31)
| Baseline characteristics | Values | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 76 ± 10 | |
| Sex (male) | 17 (54.8) | |
| MDS WHO2017 | ||
| MDS-RS-SLD | 6 (19.4) | |
| MDS-RS-MLD | 10 (32.3) | |
| MDS-SLD | 2 (6.5) | |
| MDS-MLD | 9 (29.0) | |
| MDS with excess blasts-1 | 2 (6.5) | |
| MDS associated with isolated del (5q) | 2 (6.5) | |
| MDS evolution (year) | 3.9 ± 3.5 | |
| Number of red blood cell units transfused | 47 [286] | |
| Transfusion burden | ||
| Low (< 25 RBC) | 10 (32.3) | |
| Medium (25–125 RBC) | 12 (38.7) | |
| High (> 125 RBC) | 9 (29.0) | |
| Iron chelation treatment | 20 (64.5) | |
| Hemoglobin level (g/dL) | 8.9 ± 1.7 | |
| Ferritin level (ng/mL) | 1,469 [5,739] | |
| NT-proBNP value (pg/mL) | 476 [577] | |
| High-sensitive T troponine value (pg/mL) | 15 [5.3] | |
| CVRFs | ||
| ≥ 1 CVRF | 29 (93.5) | |
| Arterial hypertension | 18 (58.1) | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 5 (16.1) | |
| Dyslipidemia | 6 (19.4) | |
| Active or previous smoking | 9 (29.0) | |
| Obesity | 5 (16.1) | |
| Previous cardiac disease | ||
| Total | 12 (38.7) | |
| Ischemic cardiopathy | 6 (19.4) | |
| Myocardial infarction | 3 (9.7) | |
| Arrhythmias | 7 (22.6) | |
| Heart valve disease ≥ moderate | 5 (16.1) | |
| Systolic dysfunction | 2 (6.5) | |
| Heart failure | 2 (6.5) | |
| Pacemaker | 0 (0.0) | |
| Cardiovascular treatment | ||
| Antiplatelet therapy | 8 (25.8) | |
| Anticoagulation | 5 (16.1) | |
| Diuretic | 16 (51.6) | |
| ACE inhibitors/ARBs | 10 (32.3) | |
| Beta-blocker | 5 (16.1) | |
| Digoxin | 1 (3.2) | |
| Statins | 5 (16.1) | |
Qualitative variables were expressed as number (%) and continuous values were reported as mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range depending on their normal or not distribution.
ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARBs: angiotensin-II receptor antagonists or blockers, CVRF: cardiovascular risk factor, MDS: myelodysplastic syndrome, MLS: multilineage dysplasia; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, RBC: red blood cell, RS: ring sideroblasts, SLD: single lineage dysplasia, WHO: World Health Organization.
Cardiac magnetic resonance main results in transfusion dependent MDS patients compared to controls
| Cardiac magnetic resonance main results | Patients (n = 31) | Controls (n = 13) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV end-diastolic volume (mL) | 155 ± 49 | 111 ± 17.1 |
| |
| LV end-systolic volume (mL) | 59 ± 35 | 34.5 ± 8.3 |
| |
| LV mass (g) | 125 ± 36 | 91 ± 11.9 |
| |
| RV end-diastolic volume (mL) | 141 ± 39 | 103 ± 18 |
| |
| RV end-systolic volume (mL) | 54 ± 22 | 35 ± 7.8 |
| |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 63.6 ± 10.7 | 68.2 ± 6.5 | 0.109 | |
| RV ejection fraction (%) | 65.6 ± 6.6 | 66.2 ± 6.3 | 0.764 | |
| Left atria area (cm2) | 29.2 ± 7 | 18.5 ± 3.5 |
| |
| Right atria area (cm2) | 23.4 ± 8.2 | 16.8 ± 2.7 |
| |
| Septal myocardial T2* time (ms) | 32.8 ± 8.8 | 33.8 ± 2.7 | 0.415 | |
| T1 native mapping (ms) | 995 ± 84 | 988 ± 31 | 0.729 | |
| Hepatic T2* time (ms) | 7.1 ± 7.8 | 20.23 ± 8.5 |
| |
| LV GLS FT (%) | −20.2 ± 2.3 | −27.9 ± 3 |
| |
| LV GCS FT (%) | −20.7 ± 6.9 | −24.1 ± 3 |
| |
| LV GRS FT (%) | 83.8 ± 28 | 83.5 ± 39 | 0.985 | |
| RV GLS FT (%) | −28.1 ± 5.1 | −24.3 ± 3 |
| |
| Pathological strain value | ||||
| LV GLS FT (> −19.3%) | 10 (32.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| |
| LV GCS FT (> −21.7%) | 15 (48.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| |
| LV GRS FT (< 28.5%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1.000 | |
| RV GLS FT (> −20.2%) | 2 (6.5) | 0 (0.0) | 1.000 | |
Qualitative variables were expressed as number (%) and continuous values were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Bold-faced p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
FT: feature tracking, GCS: global circumferential strain, GLS: global longitudinal strain, GRS: global radial strain, LV: left ventricle, MDS: myelodysplastic syndrome, RV: right ventricle.
Figure 2Examples of cMR multimodality approach in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients.
From left to right images show results of cMR multimodal approximation: SSFP short-axis view, myocardial and hepatic T2*, LGE, native T1 mapping, and LV-GLS by feature tracking.
Patient with non-dilated LV (A: diastole, B: systole) and normal LVEF 57% (C: associated Movie 1), reduced myocardial T2* 8 ms (D) and hepatic T2* 1 ms (E), absence of LGE (F), reduced native T1 682 ms (G) and impaired 4-chamber LV-GLS −15% (H, associated Movie 2). Patient with mild dilated LV (I: diastole, J: systole) and mild LVEF dysfunction 53% (K, associated Movie 3), reduced myocardial T2* 17 ms (L) and hepatic T2* 11 ms (M), absence of LGE (N), reduced native T1 899ms (O) and 2-chamber impaired LV-GLS −16.6% (P, associated Movie 4). Patient with mild dilated LV (Q: diastole, R: systole) and normal LVEF 61% (S, associated Movie 5), normal myocardial T2* 33 ms (T), reduced hepatic T2* 6 ms (U), absence of LGE (V), normal native T1 944 ms (W) and impaired 2-chamber LV-GLS −18.6% (X, associated Movie 6).
cMR: cardiac magnetic resonance, LGE: late gadolinium enhancement, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, LV-GLS: left ventricular global longitudinal strain, SSFP: steady-state free precession.
Figure 3Correlation between myocardial T2* and LV GLS-feature tracking.
LV-GLS: left ventricular global longitudinal strain.
Figure 4Receiver operating curve of LV-GLS by feature tracking for predicting all-cause death and/or cardiovascular event.
LV-GLS: left ventricular global longitudinal strain.
Figure 5Kaplan Meier survival curve of LV-GLS by feature tracking for the combined all-cause death and/or cardiovascular event. Patients are stratified by LV-GLS ≥ −17.7% and < −17.7%. Individuals with LV-GLS ≥ −17.7% by magnetic resonance feature tracking suffered the combined event more frequently with a shorter event-free time.
GLS: global longitudinal strain, LV-GLS: left ventricular global longitudinal strain.