Simone Romano1, Robert M Judd2, Raymond J Kim2, Han W Kim2, Igor Klem2, John F Heitner3, Dipan J Shah4, Jennifer Jue5, Brent E White5, Raksha Indorkar5, Chetan Shenoy2, Afshin Farzaneh-Far6. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Department of Cardiology, New York Methodist Hospital, New York, New York. 4. Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas. 5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 6. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: afshin@uic.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature-tracking-derived global longitudinal strain (GLS) in a large multicenter population of patients with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. BACKGROUND: Direct assessment of myocardial fiber deformation with GLS using echocardiography or CMR feature tracking has shown promise in providing prognostic information incremental to ejection fraction (EF) in single-center studies. Given the growing use of CMR for assessing persons with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, we hypothesized that feature-tracking-derived GLS may provide independent prognostic information in a multicenter population of patients with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Consecutive patients at 4 U.S. medical centers undergoing CMR with EF <50% and ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy were included in this study. Feature-tracking GLS was calculated from 3 long-axis cine-views. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to examine the association between GLS and death. Incremental prognostic value of GLS was assessed in nested models. RESULTS: Of the 1,012 patients in this study, 133 died during median follow-up of 4.4 years. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the risk of death increased significantly with worsening GLS tertiles (log-rank p < 0.0001). Each 1% worsening in GLS was associated with an 89.1% increased risk of death after adjustment for clinical and imaging risk factors including EF and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (hazard ratio [HR]:1.891 per %; p < 0.001). Addition of GLS in this model resulted in significant improvement in the C-statistic (0.628 to 0.867; p < 0.0001). Continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) was 1.148 (95% confidence interval: 0.996 to 1.318). GLS was independently associated with death after adjustment for clinical and imaging risk factors (including EF and late gadolinium enhancement) in both ischemic (HR: 1.942 per %; p < 0.001) and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy subgroups (HR: 2.101 per %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CMR feature-tracking-derived GLS is a powerful independent predictor of mortality in a multicenter population of patients with ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, incremental to common clinical and CMR risk factors including EF and LGE.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature-tracking-derived global longitudinal strain (GLS) in a large multicenter population of patients with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. BACKGROUND: Direct assessment of myocardial fiber deformation with GLS using echocardiography or CMR feature tracking has shown promise in providing prognostic information incremental to ejection fraction (EF) in single-center studies. Given the growing use of CMR for assessing persons with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, we hypothesized that feature-tracking-derived GLS may provide independent prognostic information in a multicenter population of patients with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Consecutive patients at 4 U.S. medical centers undergoing CMR with EF <50% and ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy were included in this study. Feature-tracking GLS was calculated from 3 long-axis cine-views. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to examine the association between GLS and death. Incremental prognostic value of GLS was assessed in nested models. RESULTS: Of the 1,012 patients in this study, 133 died during median follow-up of 4.4 years. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the risk of death increased significantly with worsening GLS tertiles (log-rank p < 0.0001). Each 1% worsening in GLS was associated with an 89.1% increased risk of death after adjustment for clinical and imaging risk factors including EF and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (hazard ratio [HR]:1.891 per %; p < 0.001). Addition of GLS in this model resulted in significant improvement in the C-statistic (0.628 to 0.867; p < 0.0001). Continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) was 1.148 (95% confidence interval: 0.996 to 1.318). GLS was independently associated with death after adjustment for clinical and imaging risk factors (including EF and late gadolinium enhancement) in both ischemic (HR: 1.942 per %; p < 0.001) and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy subgroups (HR: 2.101 per %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CMR feature-tracking-derived GLS is a powerful independent predictor of mortality in a multicenter population of patients with ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, incremental to common clinical and CMR risk factors including EF and LGE.
Authors: Theodoros D Karamitsos; Jane M Francis; Saul Myerson; Joseph B Selvanayagam; Stefan Neubauer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Igor Klem; Dipan J Shah; Richard D White; Dudley J Pennell; Albert C van Rossum; Matthias Regenfus; Udo Sechtem; Paulo R Schvartzman; Peter Hunold; Pierre Croisille; Michele Parker; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-09-12 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Simone Romano; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; Han W Kim; Igor Klem; John Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Jennifer Jue; Brent E White; Chetan Shenoy; Afshin Farzaneh-Far Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sujith Kuruvilla; Nebiyu Adenaw; Arabindra B Katwal; Michael J Lipinski; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Siddique A Abbasi; Andrew Ertel; Ravi V Shah; Vineet Dandekar; Jaehoon Chung; Geetha Bhat; Ankit A Desai; Raymond Y Kwong; Afshin Farzaneh-Far Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Simone Romano; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; Han W Kim; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Richard B Devereux; Pablo Salazar; Michael Trybula; Richard C Chia; Kaleigh Evans; Afshin Farzaneh-Far Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-11-05
Authors: Simone Romano; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Chetan Shenoy; Kaleigh Evans; Benjamin Romer; Pablo Salazar; Afshin Farzaneh-Far Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-11-11
Authors: Pierpaolo Palumbo; Francesco Masedu; Camilla De Cataldo; Ester Cannizzaro; Federico Bruno; Silvia Pradella; Francesco Arrigoni; Marco Valenti; Alessandra Splendiani; Antonio Barile; Andrea Giovagnoni; Carlo Masciocchi; Ernesto Di Cesare Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Sören J Backhaus; Andreas Schuster; Sebastian Kelle; Johannes T Kowallick; Torben Lange; Christian Stehning; Marcus Billing; Joachim Lotz; Burkert Pieske; Gerd Hasenfuß Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Laura Keil; Céleste Chevalier; Paulus Kirchhof; Stefan Blankenberg; Gunnar Lund; Kai Müllerleile; Christina Magnussen Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 5.923