Literature DB >> 29361479

Feature-Tracking Global Longitudinal Strain Predicts Death in a Multicenter Population of Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Incremental to Ejection Fraction and Late Gadolinium Enhancement.

Simone Romano1, Robert M Judd2, Raymond J Kim2, Han W Kim2, Igor Klem2, John F Heitner3, Dipan J Shah4, Jennifer Jue5, Brent E White5, Raksha Indorkar5, Chetan Shenoy2, Afshin Farzaneh-Far6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature-tracking-derived global longitudinal strain (GLS) in a large multicenter population of patients with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Direct assessment of myocardial fiber deformation with GLS using echocardiography or CMR feature tracking has shown promise in providing prognostic information incremental to ejection fraction (EF) in single-center studies. Given the growing use of CMR for assessing persons with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, we hypothesized that feature-tracking-derived GLS may provide independent prognostic information in a multicenter population of patients with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
METHODS: Consecutive patients at 4 U.S. medical centers undergoing CMR with EF <50% and ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy were included in this study. Feature-tracking GLS was calculated from 3 long-axis cine-views. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to examine the association between GLS and death. Incremental prognostic value of GLS was assessed in nested models.
RESULTS: Of the 1,012 patients in this study, 133 died during median follow-up of 4.4 years. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the risk of death increased significantly with worsening GLS tertiles (log-rank p < 0.0001). Each 1% worsening in GLS was associated with an 89.1% increased risk of death after adjustment for clinical and imaging risk factors including EF and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (hazard ratio [HR]:1.891 per %; p < 0.001). Addition of GLS in this model resulted in significant improvement in the C-statistic (0.628 to 0.867; p < 0.0001). Continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) was 1.148 (95% confidence interval: 0.996 to 1.318). GLS was independently associated with death after adjustment for clinical and imaging risk factors (including EF and late gadolinium enhancement) in both ischemic (HR: 1.942 per %; p < 0.001) and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy subgroups (HR: 2.101 per %; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: CMR feature-tracking-derived GLS is a powerful independent predictor of mortality in a multicenter population of patients with ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, incremental to common clinical and CMR risk factors including EF and LGE.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; cardiomyopathy; feature tracking; global longitudinal strain; left ventricular function; mortality; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29361479      PMCID: PMC6043421          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  28 in total

1.  Prediction of all-cause mortality from global longitudinal speckle strain: comparison with ejection fraction and wall motion scoring.

Authors:  Tony Stanton; Rodel Leano; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 2.  The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure.

Authors:  Theodoros D Karamitsos; Jane M Francis; Saul Myerson; Joseph B Selvanayagam; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction.

Authors:  Kashif Kalam; Petr Otahal; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Prognostic value of routine cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and myocardial damage: an international, multicenter study.

Authors:  Igor Klem; Dipan J Shah; Richard D White; Dudley J Pennell; Albert C van Rossum; Matthias Regenfus; Udo Sechtem; Paulo R Schvartzman; Peter Hunold; Pierre Croisille; Michele Parker; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 5.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction: current and emerging applications.

Authors:  Han W Kim; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Movement of the mitral ring: a study in ultrasoundcardiography.

Authors:  A Zaky; L Grabhorn; H Feigenbaum
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Association of Feature-Tracking Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain With All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Simone Romano; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; Han W Kim; Igor Klem; John Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Jennifer Jue; Brent E White; Chetan Shenoy; Afshin Farzaneh-Far
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sujith Kuruvilla; Nebiyu Adenaw; Arabindra B Katwal; Michael J Lipinski; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 7.792

9.  Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing.

Authors:  Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance on management and clinical decision-making in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Siddique A Abbasi; Andrew Ertel; Ravi V Shah; Vineet Dandekar; Jaehoon Chung; Geetha Bhat; Ankit A Desai; Raymond Y Kwong; Afshin Farzaneh-Far
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  65 in total

1.  Prognostic Implications of Mitral Annular Plane Systolic Excursion in Patients with Hypertension and a Clinical Indication for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Simone Romano; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; Han W Kim; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Richard B Devereux; Pablo Salazar; Michael Trybula; Richard C Chia; Kaleigh Evans; Afshin Farzaneh-Far
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-11-05

2.  Clinical dilemmas in predicting the progression of pre-clinical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-is MRI strain the solution?

Authors:  Jay Ramchand; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  Feature-Tracking Global Longitudinal Strain Predicts Mortality in Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Simone Romano; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Chetan Shenoy; Kaleigh Evans; Benjamin Romer; Pablo Salazar; Afshin Farzaneh-Far
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-11

4.  Real-world clinical validity of cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking in primitive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Palumbo; Francesco Masedu; Camilla De Cataldo; Ester Cannizzaro; Federico Bruno; Silvia Pradella; Francesco Arrigoni; Marco Valenti; Alessandra Splendiani; Antonio Barile; Andrea Giovagnoni; Carlo Masciocchi; Ernesto Di Cesare
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Impairment of right ventricular strain evaluated by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking in patients with interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kamide; Shingo Kato; Keigo Hayakawa; Kazuki Fukui; Hideya Kitamura; Takashi Ogura; Tae Iwasawa; Kazuo Kimura; Kouichi Tamura; Daisuke Utsunomiya
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Cardiovascular disease in young People with Type 1 Diabetes: Search for Cardiovascular Biomarkers.

Authors:  Michal Schäfer; Kristen J Nadeau; Jane E B Reusch
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.852

7.  Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of multilayer cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking derived longitudinal and circumferential strain.

Authors:  Saikrishna Ananthapadmanabhan; Echo Deng; Giuseppe Femia; Simon Tang; Eng-Siew Koh; Andreas Schuster; Raj Puranik; Pankaj Gupta; Tuan Nguyen; Hany Dimitri; James Otton
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-04

8.  Quantification of strain analysis and late gadolinium enhancement in coronary chronic total occlusion: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study.

Authors:  Lijun Zhang; Jinfan Tian; Xueyao Yang; Jielin Liu; Yi He; Xiantao Song
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

9.  Impact of fully automated assessment on interstudy reproducibility of biventricular volumes and function in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sören J Backhaus; Andreas Schuster; Sebastian Kelle; Johannes T Kowallick; Torben Lange; Christian Stehning; Marcus Billing; Joachim Lotz; Burkert Pieske; Gerd Hasenfuß
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  CMR-Based Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death and Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Laura Keil; Céleste Chevalier; Paulus Kirchhof; Stefan Blankenberg; Gunnar Lund; Kai Müllerleile; Christina Magnussen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.