Literature DB >> 34080253

Oxygen-enhanced functional lung imaging using a contemporary 0.55 T MRI system.

Ipshita Bhattacharya1, Rajiv Ramasawmy1, Ahsan Javed1, Marcus Y Chen1, Thomas Benkert2, Waqas Majeed3, Robert J Lederman1, Joel Moss4, Robert S Balaban5, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate oxygen-enhanced pulmonary imaging at 0.55 T with 3D stack-of-spirals ultrashort-TE (UTE) acquisition. Oxygen-enhanced pulmonary MRI offers the measurement of regional lung ventilation and perfusion using inhaled oxygen as a contrast agent. Low-field MRI systems equipped with contemporary hardware can provide high-quality structural lung imaging by virtue of the prolonged T2 *. Fortuitously, the T1 relaxivity of oxygen increases at lower field strengths, which is expected to improve the sensitivity of oxygen-enhanced lung MRI. We implemented a breath-held T1 -weighted 3D stack-of-spirals UTE acquisition with a 7 ms spiral-out readout. Measurement repeatability was assessed using five repetitions of oxygen-enhanced lung imaging in healthy volunteers (n = 7). The signal intensity at both normoxia and hyperoxia was strongly dependent on lung tissue density modulated by breath-hold volume during the five repetitions. A voxel-wise correction for lung tissue density improved the repeatability of percent signal enhancement maps (coefficient of variation = 34 ± 16%). Percent signal enhancement maps were compared in 15 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a rare cystic disease known to reduce pulmonary function. We measured a mean percent signal enhancement of 9.0 ± 3.5% at 0.55 T in healthy volunteers, and reduced signal enhancement in patients with LAM (5.4 ± 4.8%, p = 0.02). The heterogeneity, estimated by the percent of lung volume exhibiting low enhancement, was significantly increased in patients with LAM compared with healthy volunteers (11.1 ± 6.0% versus 30.5 ± 13.1%, p = 0.01), illustrating the capability to measure regional functional deficits.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LAM; low-field MRI; lung; lung function; oxygen-enhanced MRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34080253      PMCID: PMC8377594          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.478


  31 in total

1.  Pulmonary ventilation-perfusion MR imaging in clinical patients.

Authors:  T Nakagawa; H Sakuma; S Murashima; N Ishida; K Matsumura; K Takeda
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Hyperpolarized gas MRI in pulmonology.

Authors:  Agilo Luitger Kern; Jens Vogel-Claussen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Opportunities in Interventional and Diagnostic Imaging by Using High-Performance Low-Field-Strength MRI.

Authors:  Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Rajiv Ramasawmy; Matthew C Restivo; Ipshita Bhattacharya; Burcu Basar; Daniel A Herzka; Michael S Hansen; Toby Rogers; W Patricia Bandettini; Delaney R McGuirt; Christine Mancini; David Grodzki; Rainer Schneider; Waqas Majeed; Himanshu Bhat; Hui Xue; Joel Moss; Ashkan A Malayeri; Elizabeth C Jones; Alan P Koretsky; Peter Kellman; Marcus Y Chen; Robert J Lederman; Robert S Balaban
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Oxygen-enhanced 3D radial ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging in the healthy human lung.

Authors:  Stanley J Kruger; Sean B Fain; Kevin M Johnson; Robert V Cadman; Scott K Nagle
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis: correlation of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, chest radiography, and CT with pulmonary function tests.

Authors:  N A Avila; C C Chen; S C Chu; M Wu; E C Jones; R D Neumann; J Moss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Three-dimensional Isotropic Functional Imaging of Cystic Fibrosis Using Oxygen-enhanced MRI: Comparison with Hyperpolarized 3He MRI.

Authors:  Wei Zha; Scott K Nagle; Robert V Cadman; Mark L Schiebler; Sean B Fain
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Non-contrast-enhanced perfusion and ventilation assessment of the human lung by means of fourier decomposition in proton MRI.

Authors:  Grzegorz Bauman; Michael Puderbach; Michael Deimling; Vladimir Jellus; Christophe Chefd'hotel; Julien Dinkel; Christian Hintze; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Lothar R Schad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Impact of oxygen inhalation on the pulmonary circulation: assessment by magnetic resonance (MR)-perfusion and MR-flow measurements.

Authors:  Sebastian Ley; Michael Puderbach; Frank Risse; Julia Ley-Zaporozhan; Monika Eichinger; Daisuke Takenaka; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Michael Bock
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 9.  Hyperpolarized Gas MR Imaging: Technique and Applications.

Authors:  Justus E Roos; Holman P McAdams; S Sivaram Kaushik; Bastiaan Driehuys
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Efficient spiral in-out and EPI balanced steady-state free precession cine imaging using a high-performance 0.55T MRI.

Authors:  Matthew C Restivo; Rajiv Ramasawmy; W Patricia Bandettini; Daniel A Herzka; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.737

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Low-field magnetic resonance imaging : Just less expensive or completely different?]

Authors:  Jürgen Hennig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Measuring short-term changes in specific ventilation using dynamic specific ventilation imaging.

Authors:  Eric T Geier; G Kim Prisk; Rui C Sá
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  Imaging gravity-induced lung water redistribution with automated inline processing at 0.55 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Felicia Seemann; Ahsan Javed; Rachel Chae; Rajiv Ramasawmy; Kendall O'Brien; Scott Baute; Hui Xue; Robert J Lederman; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.903

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.