Literature DB >> 10627012

Abdominoplasty and abdominal wall rehabilitation: a comprehensive approach.

O M Ramirez1.   

Abstract

Standard abdominoplasty techniques involve a low horizontal or W skin excision, muscle plication, and umbilical transposition. Newer techniques include suction-assisted lipectomy, the use of high lateral tension with fascial suspension, and external oblique muscle advancement. The author has modified these traditional procedures and added new techniques to improve the aesthetic and functional results of the abdominoplasty procedure. This modification provides a comprehensive approach to abdominal wall aesthetic improvement and rehabilitation. The comprehensive approach described includes four components: the "U-M dermolipectomy," "V umbilicoplasty," the rectus abdominis "myofascial release," and suction-assisted lipectomy. The patient is marked while standing for areas of suction lipectomy and undermining. The lower incision is designed as an open U with the lateral limbs placed inside the bikini line. The upper incision is a lazy M with the higher peaks located at the level of the flanks. Subcutaneous hydration is achieved to perform suction along the flanks, waistline, and iliac areas. Gentle suction of the flaps is also performed. The umbilicus is cored out in a heart shape. The flaps within the U-M marks are excised, and the undermining is performed to the xiphoid and costal margins. The rectus diastasis is marked, and the anterior rectus fascia is incised at the junction of the medial third with the central third of the width of the rectus sheath. Horizontal figure-eight plication sutures by using the lateral fascial edge enable easier infolding of the central tissue. The new recipient of the umbilicus is made by an incision in a V shape on the abdominal flap. The umbilicus is telescoped, and the triangular flap of the abdomen is sutured to the triangular defect of the umbilicus. Skin flap fixation to the umbilicus relieves tension in the lower portion of the flap. The upper skin flap, which is cut in an M manner, provides lateral tension and matches the length of the lower flap. A standard fascial suspension is used and closure is performed in layers. The techniques described here are intertwined procedures. Each facilitates the accomplishment of the other procedure, and they complement each other. They all attain the 12 objectives of the abdominoplasty described. These combined techniques have been used in 104 patients in a period of 11 years. Complications were minimal and easily manageable, except for one patient who required excision of a pseudobursa and retightening of the lower quadrants of the abdominal wall musculature to correct extreme lordosis. A comprehensive approach for the treatment of complex abdominal wall aesthetic and functional defects is presented. These require thoughtful integration of the four components mentioned. This approach has allowed predictable, reproducible, and aesthetically pleasing results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10627012     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200001000-00069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  20 in total

1.  Neoumbilicoplasty is a useful adjuvant procedure in abdominoplasty.

Authors:  Aa Al-Shaham
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2009

2.  Laparoscopic repair of diastasis recti using the 'Venetian blinds' technique of plication with prosthetic reinforcement: a retrospective study.

Authors:  C Palanivelu; M Rangarajan; P A Jategaonkar; V Amar; K S Gokul; B Srikanth
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Pseudotumors after primary abdominal lipectomy as a new sequela in patients with abdominal apron.

Authors:  Adrian Dragu; Alexander D Bach; Elias Polykandriotis; Ulrich Kneser; Raymund E Horch
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Totally endoscopic surgery on diastasis recti associated with midline hernias. The advantages of a minimally invasive approach. Prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Juan Bellido Luque; A Bellido Luque; J Valdivia; J M Suarez Gráu; J Gomez Menchero; J García Moreno; J Guadalajara Jurado
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  A systematic review on the outcomes of correction of diastasis of the recti.

Authors:  F Hickey; J G Finch; A Khanna
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Treatment of umbilical hernia and recti muscles diastasis without a periumbilical incision.

Authors:  J Kulhanek; O Mestak
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Tensiometry as a decision tool for abdominal wall reconstruction with component separation.

Authors:  Adrian Dragu; Peter Klein; Frank Unglaub; Elias Polykandriotis; Ulrich Kneser; Werner Hohenberger; Raymund E Horch
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Comparison of outcomes in rectus abdominis diastasis repair-which data do we need in a hernia registry?

Authors:  F Köckerling; R Lorenz; B Stechemesser; J Conze; A Kuthe; W Reinpold; H Niebuhr; B Lammers; K Zarras; R Fortelny; F Mayer; H Hoffmann; J F Kukleta; D Weyhe
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Closing the gap: evidence-based surgical treatment of rectus diastasis associated with abdominal wall hernias.

Authors:  H ElHawary; N Barone; D Zammit; J E Janis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  A study of postural changes after abdominal rectus plication abdominoplasty.

Authors:  M Mazzocchi; L A Dessy; S Di Ronza; P Iodice; R Saggini; N Scuderi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.