The second quantum revolution hinges on the creation of materials that unite atomic structural precision with electronic and structural tunability. A molecular approach to quantum information science (QIS) promises to enable the bottom-up creation of quantum systems. Within the broad reach of QIS, which spans fields ranging from quantum computation to quantum communication, we will focus on quantum sensing. Quantum sensing harnesses quantum control to interrogate the world around us. A broadly applicable class of quantum sensors would feature adaptable environmental compatibility, control over distance from the target analyte, and a tunable energy range of interaction. Molecules enable customizable "designer" quantum sensors with tunable functionality and compatibility across a range of environments. These capabilities offer the potential to bring unmatched sensitivity and spatial resolution to address a wide range of sensing tasks from the characterization of dynamic biological processes to the detection of emergent phenomena in condensed matter. In this Outlook, we outline the concepts and design criteria central to quantum sensors and look toward the next generation of designer quantum sensors based on new classes of molecular sensors.
The second quantum revolution hinges on the creation of materials that unite atomic structural precision with electronic and structural tunability. A molecular approach to quantum information science (QIS) promises to enable the bottom-up creation of quantum systems. Within the broad reach of QIS, which spans fields ranging from quantum computation to quantum communication, we will focus on quantum sensing. Quantum sensing harnesses quantum control to interrogate the world around us. A broadly applicable class of quantum sensors would feature adaptable environmental compatibility, control over distance from the target analyte, and a tunable energy range of interaction. Molecules enable customizable "designer" quantum sensors with tunable functionality and compatibility across a range of environments. These capabilities offer the potential to bring unmatched sensitivity and spatial resolution to address a wide range of sensing tasks from the characterization of dynamic biological processes to the detection of emergent phenomena in condensed matter. In this Outlook, we outline the concepts and design criteria central to quantum sensors and look toward the next generation of designer quantum sensors based on new classes of molecular sensors.
We are living in the second
quantum revolution. The realization of the quantum nature of the universe
instigated the first quantum revolution; in this second quantum revolution,
we are harnessing unprecedented control of those quantum properties
to transform our universe. Control over quantum properties is at the
core of the broad field of quantum information science (QIS),[1−10] which includes fantastical-sounding ideas such as the quantum Internet,
quantum computing, and quantum metrology. Among these emerging quantum
technologies, quantum sensing has demonstrated early successes, with
discoveries across fields from condensed matter physics to molecular
biology.[11−16] In these areas, quantum sensing exploits the sensitivity of quantum
states to detect minute environmental fluctuations or perturbations
to gain increased information about the natural world. Within this
area, scientists are leveraging quantum coherence and entanglement
between nuclear and electronic states (Figure A),[17] between
electronic states of exotic matter (Figure B), (18−20)or between photon degrees of freedom
(Figure C)[22] to accomplish sensing tasks inaccessible with
their classical analogues. Further, quantum sensor arrays built on
entangled quantum states could surpass classical sensing limits, allowing
us to probe theoretically predicted phenomena or matter.[21] This has been elegantly demonstrated by the
Advanced Light Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (aLIGO)
to further enhance the detection limits of gravitational waves.[22]
Figure 1
Examples of existing sensing protocols that leverage quantum
mechanical
properties such as coherence and entanglement to detect (A) electron–nuclear
hyperfine interactions, (B) electric fields, and (C) space–time
perturbations.
Examples of existing sensing protocols that leverage quantum
mechanical
properties such as coherence and entanglement to detect (A) electron–nuclear
hyperfine interactions, (B) electric fields, and (C) space–time
perturbations.While there are many candidates
for quantum sensors, the joint
features of atomic-scale tunability, reproducibility, and chemical
specificity make paramagnetic molecules a paradigm-shifting category
of materials.[23−28] Fundamentally, the same chemical design features that facilitate
targeted drug design with molecules afford chemical selectivity and
enable proximity to their sensing target in quantum sensors. These
features enhance the sensing interaction, maximizing resolution while
minimizing noise and detection limits. Molecules also support the
additional design requirements of quantum sensors beyond those of
classical sensors: a mechanism to prepare the initial sensor state
and lifetimes that are long enough to facilitate high-fidelity sensing
and read-out. Molecules offer a tunable electronic structure, enabling
control of coherent quantum state lifetimes and making them ideal
hosts for electronic manifolds that enable optical initialization
and read-out of spin information. A specific class of electronic structure
enables numerous defects in semiconductors to offer optical single-spin
read-out, a critical feature for nanoscale sensing.[29,30] A molecule designed to mimic this electronic structure can seamlessly
interface with the spectroscopic infrastructure built up for defect-based
systems, thereby catapulting forward the application of molecules
as quantum sensors. We recently demonstrated all optical initialization
and read-out with three spin-triplet molecular systems, a first important
step toward this goal.[31]Molecular
quantum sensors would have broad applicability, impacting
fields ranging from structural biology to dark matter detection. One
key example is the visionary goal of single-molecule magnetic resonance.
The modularity of molecules could enable targeted interactions to
precisely position sensors on biological substrates. Localizing molecular
quantum sensors is the first step toward mapping out protein structures
and dynamics with single-molecule magnetic resonance techniques (Figure ).[14,15] Further exploiting the electric and magnetic field detection capabilities
of quantum sensors, molecular quantum sensors proximal to extended
solids may be used to detect and characterize emergent phenomena in
condensed matter physics, such as fundamental excitations like spinons
and magnons.[34,35] Alternatively, in astrophysics,
the detection of dark matter necessitates sensors with exceptionally
high sensitivities, tunable energy responses, and orientation information.[36] In each of these areas, chemical synthesis provides
a powerful method for both tuning quantum states and controlling multisensor
interactions that underpin quantum entanglement to achieve unparalleled
sensitivities.
Figure 2
(Bottom) Calculated sensitivities of nitrogen-vacancy
(NV) centers
to the 1H nuclear spin magnetic moment quantified by the
number of detectable 1H spins using a published formula.[14] Orange circles, green squares, and purple triangles
represent NV center data from refs (14), (32), and (33) respectively.
For consistency, we included only NV centers with directly measured
depths whose coherence times (T2) were
measured through XY8-k pulse sequences, assumed a
read-out fidelity F = 0.03, and excluded quantum
logic-based read-out from ref (14). The yellow region highlights the distance regime in which
molecular quantum sensors can localize near target nuclei. The boxed
region represents the localization and sensitivity requirements necessary
for single-molecule and single-nuclei sensing, opening exciting possibilities
such as single protein studies of membrane protein dynamics in vivo (top).
(Bottom) Calculated sensitivities of nitrogen-vacancy
(NV) centers
to the 1H nuclear spin magnetic moment quantified by the
number of detectable 1H spins using a published formula.[14] Orange circles, green squares, and purple triangles
represent NV center data from refs (14), (32), and (33) respectively.
For consistency, we included only NV centers with directly measured
depths whose coherence times (T2) were
measured through XY8-k pulse sequences, assumed a
read-out fidelity F = 0.03, and excluded quantum
logic-based read-out from ref (14). The yellow region highlights the distance regime in which
molecular quantum sensors can localize near target nuclei. The boxed
region represents the localization and sensitivity requirements necessary
for single-molecule and single-nuclei sensing, opening exciting possibilities
such as single protein studies of membrane protein dynamics in vivo (top).Realizing the promise of molecular quantum sensors necessitates
understanding and controlling several key features simultaneously.
Molecular sensors precisely tailored to the desired sensing task and
imbued with analyte specificity through targeted conjugation or noncovalent
binding could outperform existing quantum sensors. Colocalization
of molecular sensors to their targets with Ångström-scale
proximity would maximize the sensor response and detection resolution.
At the same time, molecules targeted to the specific environments
that are compatible with temperature, opacity of the environment,
and intended time scale of the measurement will enable translating
quantum-enhanced measurements into new applications. The immense potential
of chemical synthesis perfectly positions molecules to deliver a new
class of broadly tunable quantum sensors with unparalleled sensitivity
and specificity.In this Outlook, we highlight key considerations
for quantum sensors,
review several proof-of principle demonstrations that are critical
for the use of molecular quantum sensor candidates, and describe exciting
applications for quantum sensing. In addition, we outline how these
new classes of designer materials may deliver transformative quantum
sensor capabilities while comparing to them the state-of-the-art within
the field.
Requirements for Quantum Sensors
The requirements for
quantum sensors[21] are similar to those
for quantum bits, or qubits.[37] Much like
qubits, quantum sensors must (1) have discrete,
well-defined quantum states, such as polarization of photons, quantized
currents in superconducting circuits, and electronic or nuclear spin
states;[21,38] (2) be initialized into a single, well-known
state such that the desired stimulus produces a specific, predictable,
and measurable signal; (3) be addressable for manipulation, for example,
via optical, microwave, or radiofrequency excitation; and (4) incorporate
a sensor read-out pathway to measure the signal response. However,
unlike qubits that interact minimally with the surrounding environment,
quantum sensors must (5) interact strongly with their sensing target.
This interaction needs to induce changes in the quantum state of the
sensor or transition rates between states or modulate the quantum
coherence of the sensor.[21,39−41] Judicious selection of the quantum system is imperative to maximize
sensitivity to the desired physical quantity while mitigating background
noise. Toward this end, molecular systems offer the requisite chemical
specificity to achieve unprecedented quantum sensor–analyte
proximity via covalent attachment or van der Waals interactions, maximizing
the potential sensor response.Quantum sensors also share
many requirements with classical sensing
systems. Both classical and quantum sensors require a well-defined
state that, upon interacting with an external perturbation or analyte,
undergoes a signal transduction event to create a sensing response.
However, the requirements stated above for quantum sensors include
additional considerations that classical sensors do not have. Quantum
sensors must have mechanisms to prepare the initial sensor state and
generate coherent quantum state lifetimes long enough to facilitate
high-fidelity sensing and read-out. Achieving these prerequisites
of quantum sensors, specifically a well-defined, two-level quantum
system, enables the use of entanglement to boost sensor performance
in multisensor or ensemble measurements.[9] Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon in which the quantum states
of the systems cannot be defined independently and are intrinsically
linked. Entangled sensor arrays have the potential to surpass the
standard quantum limit: for N measurements of a quantity,
the uncertainty usually scales with N–1/2. For N entangled sensors, however, the lower Heisenberg
limit applies where uncertainty scales with N–1.[21,42−44] Entanglement
has already been employed in a range of quantum systems, including
photons, atomic clocks, quantum dots, trapped ions, and nuclear spins.[40,45−54] Managing the more rapid decoherence of entangled states is critical
to realize these statistical gains but represents an opportunity for
quantum sensing to reach precisions and sensitivities beyond the limit
of classical systems.[55−58]
Toward the Next Generation of Quantum Sensors
To meet their
promise, molecular quantum sensors must address several
key challenges. First, molecular quantum sensor candidates need to
demonstrate long-lived coherence times. Sufficiently long coherence
times are crucial to maximize the sensor response to a given analyte
and to achieve optimal sensor read-out. Quantum sensor state lifetimes
establish the upper bound on both the time the sensor can interact
with its target and the time scale for read-out. These lifetimes also
establish a floor for sensitivity, limiting the minimum perturbation
of the quantum sensor that can be detected. Second, sensors must incorporate
mechanisms for initialization, such as thermal, optical, or electrical
pathways,[21,59,60] and read-out,[61−63] ideally at the single-sensor level. Individual sensor read-out mechanisms
may be most readily achieved via optical and electrical methods.To address these challenges, we and others are employing coordination
chemistry to rationally control both the physical and electronic structure
as well as coherence properties including quantum state lifetimes
(T1) and coherence times (Tm).[25,31,64−92] Ligand design provides an immediate route to achieve long T1 and Tm or optical
initialization and read-out pathways. Further tuning parameters such
as spin–orbit coupling, crystal field splitting, and electron–nuclear
hyperfine interaction provide additional handles to optimize the requisite
sensor criteria mentioned above.[25,79,86,93] In addition, harnessing
parameters such as spin–orbit coupling and hyperfine interactions
can elicit detection of physical parameters beyond magnetic fields,
including electric fields and pressure.[79,94,95] Lastly, employing anisotropic electronic structures
of transition metals can provide orientation information during sensing,
enhancing the spatial resolution of the molecular sensor.[96,97]Over the last five years, our group has made significant inroads
to understand and optimize the molecular design for quantum sensors.
We identified a system with a ligand environment comprised of nearly
nuclear spin-free elements, such as carbon, sulfur, and oxygen. This
ligand design mitigated environmental magnetic noise originating from
nearby nuclear spins that reduce Tm.[98] Using this approach, we synthesized a vanadium(IV)
complex (PPh4-d20)2[V(C8S8)3] that, when dissolved
in a similarly nuclear spin-free carbon disulfide matrix, exhibited
quantum state coherence times of 675(7) μs, a time scale on
par with nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers (Figure ).[69] This proof-of-concept
study demonstrated that synthetic chemistry can enable long coherent
quantum state lifetimes in coordination complexes.
Figure 3
Environmental nuclear
spins represent a major source of decoherence
in molecular quantum systems. By judicious design of ligand and solvent
environments with nuclear spin-free elements (carbon and sulfur),
we achieved a nearly millisecond coherence time in a molecular vanadium(IV)
complex (PPh4-d20)2[V(C8S8)3] dissolved in carbon disulfide.
Data were reproduced from ref (69).
Environmental nuclear
spins represent a major source of decoherence
in molecular quantum systems. By judicious design of ligand and solvent
environments with nuclear spin-free elements (carbon and sulfur),
we achieved a nearly millisecond coherence time in a molecular vanadium(IV)
complex (PPh4-d20)2[V(C8S8)3] dissolved in carbon disulfide.
Data were reproduced from ref (69).Progressing beyond demonstration
of long coherence times within
a highly controlled environment requires a different approach. To
achieve long coherence times in magnetically noisy environments, such
as those present in biological systems, we sought to mitigate decoherence
pathways caused by nearby spin-active nuclei in these environments
using so-called “clock-like” transitions (Figure ). Within a clock-like transition,
the slope of the transition relative to magnetic field is zero, thereby
insulating transitions from ambient magnetic noise. This principle
has been extensively used in solid-state and atomic qubits and is
the core idea behind atomic clocks. Creating these transitions requires
precise engineering of the ligand field to access hyperfine coupling-induced
electron–nuclear state mixing.[99,100] To achieve
this, we sought a S = 1/2 spin
coupled with a large nuclear spin and a large hyperfine coupling term.
Specifically, we selected a square planar coordination environment
around cobalt(II) ions in a porphyrinic metal–organic framework
[(TCPP)Co0.07Zn0.93]3[Zr6O4(OH)4(H2O)6]2.[101] The square planar environment
generates a low spin S = 1/2 state in a mixed 4s-3dz orbital. The 4s character
of the orbital enables strong Fermi contact with the I = 7/2 nuclear spin of the 59Co
nucleus, thereby engendering strong mixing (large hyperfine term).
With this system, we were able to observe coherence times of 1.96(1)
μs despite the magnetically noisy framework environment. Notably,
coherence times at the clock transition were seven times longer than
that at nonclock transitions.
Figure 4
To achieve strong electron–nuclear hyperfine
coupling for
clock transitions, we designed square planar cobalt(II) complexes
in a porphyrinic metal–organic framework [(TCPP)Co0.07Zn0.93]3[Zr6O4(OH)4(H2O)6]2. The clock transition
exhibited seven-fold longer coherence times compared to the nonclock
transition at 15 K. Data were reproduced from ref (101).
To achieve strong electron–nuclear hyperfine
coupling for
clock transitions, we designed square planar cobalt(II) complexes
in a porphyrinic metal–organic framework [(TCPP)Co0.07Zn0.93]3[Zr6O4(OH)4(H2O)6]2. The clock transition
exhibited seven-fold longer coherence times compared to the nonclock
transition at 15 K. Data were reproduced from ref (101).As described above, current state-of-the-art spin-based quantum
sensors offer optical read-out and initialization of spin information.
There is a sophisticated infrastructure built up to address these
defect-based spins. From an electronic structure perspective, one
can envision a defect within a semiconductor as an analogue to a molecule.
By mimicking the electronic structure of these materials within a
tunable molecular scaffold, it should be possible to interface molecules
with established read-out protocols. Initialization and read-out of
sensor spin states with light are particularly attractive, as this
leverages existing optical technologies for integration into a variety
of sensing environments.[102] For example,
read-out through optically detected magnetic resonance can enable
atomic spatial resolution and single-sensor read-out.[103] To accomplish this goal, we drew inspiration
from the electronic structure of defect sites such as the anionic
NV center in diamond and chromium(IV) ions in silicon carbide, which
exhibit optical pathways for initialization and read-out. Our molecular
design included three key targets: a spin-triplet ground state, a
first excited state of spin-singlet character exhibiting radiative
decay, and a sufficiently small ground state zero-field splitting
to achieve microwave manipulation.[104] Toward
this end, tetrahedral chromium(IV) complexes in strong ligand fields
(Figure a) offer the
targeted excited state structure and zero-field splitting values (e.g., D < 0.3 cm–1 in Figure b). For these systems, ground state spin
polarization was achieved through resonant optical excitation from
the spin-triplet ground state to the spin-singlet excited state, while
photoluminescence from the spin-singlet excited state enabled optical
read-out of the ground state (Figure b).[31] While such mechanisms
were previously considered exclusive to defect-based systems, this
work illustrates how synthetic chemistry may confer molecules with
optical initialization and read-out pathways. Moreover, the electronic
structures that give rise to optical addressability can be readily
translated into biologically compatible ions[70] or heteroleptic molecular architectures.[105] The insights gleaned from this work paves the way toward imbuing
optical initialization and single-spin read-out in molecular quantum
sensors in an effort to maximize spatial resolution and sensitivity.
Figure 5
(a) Molecular
structure of tetra-o-tolylchromium(IV)
complex. (b) Energy level diagram of the Cr(IV) center depicting photoluminescence
of the S = 0 state after excitation with a resonant
laser source. Data were reproduced from ref (31).
(a) Molecular
structure of tetra-o-tolylchromium(IV)
complex. (b) Energy level diagram of the Cr(IV) center depicting photoluminescence
of the S = 0 state after excitation with a resonant
laser source. Data were reproduced from ref (31).
Opportunities
for Molecular Quantum Sensors
The rapid development of quantum
sensing technology over the past
decade has yielded impressive discoveries across a range of fields.
For example, in biology, quantum sensors detected the nuclear spins
of individual proteins and the action potentials of neurons in living
organisms.[14,16] In astrophysics, the advanced
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (aLIGO) employs
a type of entangled state in photons, “squeezed light”,
to enhance signal-to-noise in the detection of gravitational waves
from exotic astrophysical events (Figure B).[22,106,107] In condensed matter physics, phenomena such as spin waves and skyrmions
have been mapped and measured at the nanometer scale with quantum
sensors on the tips of atomic force microscopes.[11,13] These discoveries illustrate the revolutionary cross-discipline
capabilities and potential of quantum sensors. Building on the fundamental
insights from these and other studies, we highlight key areas where
molecular quantum sensors may aid in future discovery across disparate
fields such as materials science, chemistry, biology, and particle
physics.Quantum sensing provides
a characterization modality to probe dynamic
biological structures and processes with subcellular resolution and
impressive sensitivities. Notable accomplishments include both mapping
magnetic ions and nanostructures in living cells and noninvasive detection
of neuronal action potentials.[16,108−114] The current state-of-the-art quantum sensor in this arena, the NV
center in diamond, has demonstrated sensing at the single-cell and,
with complementary targeting strategies, even the single-molecule
level.[14,16,113] Furthermore,
these sensors have detected individual nuclear and electronic spins
in individual proteins and, with recent advancements in single nuclear
spin detection by NV centers, point the way toward single-molecule
and single -spin magnetic resonance techniques in biological systems.[14,15,115,116] The combination of an optical read-out, chemical inertness, and
compatibility with nanofabrication has been central to many of the
NV center-based applications.[117] These
demonstrations highlight the exceptional sensitivity and resolution
for detecting magnetic signatures in biological media with atomic
defect-based quantum sensors.Building upon such impressive
demonstrations, molecular quantum
sensors with engineered specificity to cellular or molecular targets
and optical read-out will enable targeted analyte sensing down to
the single molecule. The nanometer size of molecules is commensurate
with that of biomolecules from amino acids to proteins, enabling precise
colocalization of the sensor to maximize sensitivity (Figure ). Highly dynamical systems
such as cellular membranes and intrinsically disordered proteins would
be prime targets for single-molecule magnetic resonance studies with
quantum sensors since their time-dependent properties are lost or
averaged out in ensemble measurements.[118,119]Strategies
that imbue quantum sensors with single-molecule sensitivities,
such as optical or electrical read-out, could also reveal chemical
species undetectable with ensemble magnetic resonance methods. Current
efforts have utilized entangled photons and NV centers in diamond
for nanoscale and single-molecule magnetic resonance of various chemical
species.[120−124] Single-molecule detection by quantum sensors can greatly benefit
chemical separation and analysis devices. For example, merging the
sensitivity of quantum sensors with microfluidic devices could enable
miniaturization of devices for chemical separations and analysis on
the molecular scale.[125,126] Species such as ortho/para hydrogen, ortho/para water, chiral molecules, and transient intermediates are exciting
targets for quantum sensors.[127−129] The tunability of molecular
quantum sensors to merge analyte specificity with various sensing
modalities can enable new understanding toward fundamental chemical
reactivity.In condensed matter physics, accessing new sensing
modalities with
quantum sensors offers a powerful method to develop correlations between
multiple physical phenomena with the same sensor. Designing quantum
sensors for nanoscale electrometry can enable high-resolution electric
field imaging to map charged phenomena in two-dimensional electronics
such as polar skyrmions and charged quasiparticles.[130−132] Furthermore, quantum sensors that can detect both electric and magnetic
fields can provide new insights into the coupling between charge and
spin in condensed matter phenomena, such as the current-induced motion
of skyrmions and magnetoelectric coupling in multiferroic domains.[133−140] Among electric field sensors (Figure ), single NV centers in diamond are highly attractive
for nanoscale electric field detection when used as a probe in atomic
force microscopy. However, the sensitivity of NV centers toward electric
fields is two orders of magnitude lower than that of existing techniques
such as single-electron transistors (Figure ).[141] While the
lower sensitivity can be compensated for by using shallower NV centers
in closer proximities to the electric field targets, their coherence
times rapidly degrade as their depth decreases. In contrast, molecular
quantum sensors may be placed much closer to the substrate or material
of interest for improved electric field sensitivity. Critically, molecular
systems may be easily deposited on or near the target substrate through
processing techniques, such as spin coating, dropcasting, or thermal
evaporation, which are challenging to use with defect-based systems.
Thus, using this sensor portability and the structural flexibility
to design sensors with long lifetimes on magnetically noisy surfaces
(Figure ), we envision
an immediate pathway for molecular systems to create the desired sensor-substrate
interactions and achieve optimal electric field read-out.
Figure 6
Electric field
sensitivity V m–1 Hz–1/2 of existing
sensing candidates. Spatial resolution is defined as
the characteristic length scale over which the electric field is detected.
The gray region marks the sensitivity and spatial resolution goals
for single charge detection at single-molecule resolutions. For each
candidate, spatial resolution was defined as follows. SET: half distance
of the junction. Rydberg atoms: gas cell length. Trapped ions: electrode
width. Ensemble NV centers: diamond substrate thickness. Single NV
centers: NV center depth. Sensitivity data were taken from refs (141)−[152]. SET sensitivities were
calculated using the gate capacitance and junction length.
Electric field
sensitivity V m–1 Hz–1/2 of existing
sensing candidates. Spatial resolution is defined as
the characteristic length scale over which the electric field is detected.
The gray region marks the sensitivity and spatial resolution goals
for single charge detection at single-molecule resolutions. For each
candidate, spatial resolution was defined as follows. SET: half distance
of the junction. Rydberg atoms: gas cell length. Trapped ions: electrode
width. Ensemble NV centers: diamond substrate thickness. Single NV
centers: NV center depth. Sensitivity data were taken from refs (141)−[152]. SET sensitivities were
calculated using the gate capacitance and junction length.Detecting dark matter represents another untapped opportunity
for
molecular quantum sensors with atomic control over sensor orientation
and energy states. Theory predicts a range of potential dark matter
candidates, directing the search for these particles to several different
energy regimes (Figure ).[153] Molecule-based sensors offer a unique
approach for creating tunable dark matter detectors. By appropriately
tuning nuclear or electronic energy levels, molecules could detect
dark matter via transitions between spin sublevels or electronic states
or by measuring phase changes in superpositions of quantum states.[154] For example, in the search for ultralight dark
matter candidates such as axions, molecular sensors can employ electronic
or nuclear spin states to couple to the axion, inducing energy or
spin coherence changes that can be measured.[155−157] Toward this goal, recent experimental studies have initiated searches
for dark matter using nuclear spin states, such as 199Hg, 13C, and 1H, in molecular quantum sensors.[158,159]
Figure 7
Experimental
(solid blue areas) and projected (dashed lines) sensitivities
of dark matter detection strategies that utilize interactions with
a dark photon. Solid green regions depict stellar constraints on sensitivity.
Sensitivity limits taken from refs (36), (154), (162),
and (165)−[168].
Experimental
(solid blue areas) and projected (dashed lines) sensitivities
of dark matter detection strategies that utilize interactions with
a dark photon. Solid green regions depict stellar constraints on sensitivity.
Sensitivity limits taken from refs (36), (154), (162),
and (165)−[168].One particularly attractive region for molecular sensors that has
yet to be experimentally explored is low-mass dark matter candidates
within the 10–3 to 106 eV, known as hidden
sector dark matter. One well-established candidate in this mass regime
is dark photons.[160,161] While current dark photon detection
proposals rely on dark photon scattering in superconductors or absorption
of dark photons through phonons and electron excitations in semiconductors
and polar materials,[36,162−164] a recent intriguing proposal for dark photon detection employs single-molecule
magnets. Here, energy deposited by dark matter excites intramolecular
vibrational modes and charge transfer transitions, inducing a change
in the magnetic relaxation time of local molecules. This change in
magnetic relaxation can then cause a runaway avalanche of spin relaxation,
generating a net change in magnetization signal that can be detected.[154] This approach has been recently demonstrated
with single crystals of Mn12-acetate molecular magnets,
providing a first key step toward broadly tunable molecular sensors
for dark matter.[169] The sensitivity of
these molecules to dark photons depends on the transition probability
of a given vibrational or electronic transition, which can be quantified
by the spectral intensity of infrared or UV–vis spectra. By
harnessing these transitions in dark photon detection, the Mn12-acetate molecular magnet has projected sensitivities exceeding
any other proposed strategy in this energy range (Figure ). Thus, the design of ligand
vibrational modes and coordination symmetry can enable further enhancements
in sensitivity toward discovering these dark matter candidates. Broadly
tunable molecular quantum sensors are poised to help unravel this
great mystery of particle physics.
Conclusion
A molecular
approach to quantum sensing offers tremendous promise
for creating a new class of designer quantum sensors, with each sensor
specifically targeted to an analyte and environment. Quantum sensing
has already delivered incredible achievements in precision, sensitivity,
and spatiotemporal resolution previously unimaginable with conventional
measurements. New designer quantum sensors, built from the bottom-up
with their sensing target in mind, will expand this scope and deliver
brand new capabilities. We as a community have an opportunity to collaborate
to identify the key scientific questions that would benefit from the
next generation of sensors, to create such systems, and to execute
sensing measurements. Achieving these goals will require a truly interdisciplinary
approach that will benefit an equally interdisciplinary community.
The next generation of quantum sensors will bring unprecedented capabilities
and deliver the second quantum revolution into laboratories around
the world.
Authors: I Lovchinsky; A O Sushkov; E Urbach; N P de Leon; S Choi; K De Greve; R Evans; R Gertner; E Bersin; C Müller; L McGuinness; F Jelezko; R L Walsworth; H Park; M D Lukin Journal: Science Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Y Romach; C Müller; T Unden; L J Rogers; T Isoda; K M Itoh; M Markham; A Stacey; J Meijer; S Pezzagna; B Naydenov; L P McGuinness; N Bar-Gill; F Jelezko Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Robert Fickler; Radek Lapkiewicz; William N Plick; Mario Krenn; Christoph Schaeff; Sven Ramelow; Anton Zeilinger Journal: Science Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Thomas Monz; Daniel Nigg; Esteban A Martinez; Matthias F Brandl; Philipp Schindler; Richard Rines; Shannon X Wang; Isaac L Chuang; Rainer Blatt Journal: Science Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Chunhui Du; Toeno van der Sar; Tony X Zhou; Pramey Upadhyaya; Francesco Casola; Huiliang Zhang; Mehmet C Onbasli; Caroline A Ross; Ronald L Walsworth; Yaroslav Tserkovnyak; Amir Yacoby Journal: Science Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: P Neumann; N Mizuochi; F Rempp; P Hemmer; H Watanabe; S Yamasaki; V Jacques; T Gaebel; F Jelezko; J Wrachtrup Journal: Science Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: K Randall McClain; Colin A Gould; Khetpakorn Chakarawet; Simon J Teat; Thomas J Groshens; Jeffrey R Long; Benjamin G Harvey Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: M Jeremy Amdur; Kathleen R Mullin; Michael J Waters; Danilo Puggioni; Michael K Wojnar; Mingqiang Gu; Lei Sun; Paul H Oyala; James M Rondinelli; Danna E Freedman Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 9.969