Literature DB >> 34079230

Comparison of Chief Complaints and Patient-Reported Symptoms of Treatment-Naive Lung Cancer Patients Before Surgery.

Yaqian Feng1, Wei Dai1, Yaqin Wang1, Jia Liao1, Xing Wei1, Shaohua Xie1, Wei Xu2, Qiang Li1, Fang Liu3, Qiuling Shi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer patients without chief complaints have been increasingly identified by physical examination. This study aimed to profile and compare chief complaints with patient-reported symptoms of lung cancer patients before surgery.
METHODS: Data were extracted from a multicenter, prospective longitudinal study (CN-PRO-Lung 1) in China from November 2017 to January 2020. A comparison between chief complaints and patient-reported symptoms was analyzed using the Chi-squared test.
RESULTS: A total of 201 (50.8%) lung cancer patients without chief complaints were found by physical examination at admission, and 195 (49.2%) patients had chief complaints. The top 5 chief complaints were coughing (38.1%), expectoration (25.5%), chest pain (13.6%), hemoptysis (10.6%), and shortness of breath (5.3%). There were significantly more patients with chief complaints of coughing (38.1% vs 15.0%, P <0.001) and pain (20.5% vs 6.9%, P<0.001) than those with the same symptoms rated ≥4 via MD Anderson Symptom Inventory‒Lung Cancer (MDASI-LC). There were less patients with chief complaints of fatigue (1.8% vs 10.9%, P<0.001), nausea (0.3% vs 2.5%, P=0.006), and vomiting (0.3% vs 1.8%, p=0.032) than those with the same symptoms rated ≥4 via MDASI-LC. In patients without chief complaints, the five most common moderate to severe patient-reported symptoms were disturbed sleep (19.5%), distress (13.5%), dry mouth (13%), sadness (12%), and difficulty remembering (11.1%).
CONCLUSION: Symptoms of lung cancer patients not included in the chief complaint could be identified via a patient-reported outcome instrument, suggesting the necessity of implementing the patient-reported outcome assessment before lung cancer surgery for better patient care.
© 2021 Feng et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chief complaint; lung cancer; patient-reported outcomes; surgery; symptom

Year:  2021        PMID: 34079230      PMCID: PMC8164718          DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S307814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence        ISSN: 1177-889X            Impact factor:   2.711


Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide.1 Coughing, hemoptysis, and chest pain were initially known as the principal signs of lung cancer.2 In recent years, however, with low-dose computerized tomography (CT) being applied in physical examination,3,4 more lung cancer patients without chief complaints are being diagnosed by physical examinations rather than by specific symptoms. Chief complaints may not reflect some potential symptoms that might be identified by patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.5 PRO refers to any report that comes directly from the patient about their own health rather than from the clinician or someone else.6 Research in this area has shown that PRO can identify symptoms that clinicians may overlook.7 Most previous articles related to lung cancer focused on postoperative patients or patients undergoing non-surgical treatment.8,9 Few studies investigated preoperative patients with lung cancer and how preoperative chief complaints might be concordant with PROs is still unknown. Therefore, as lung cancer patients are increasingly identified by physical examination, it is necessary to identify patients’ potential symptoms before surgery in order to provide early clinical intervention.10,11 The goal of this study was to identify and compare chief complaints and patient-reported symptoms of treatment-naive patients before lung cancer surgery.

Materials and Methods

Patient Selection

Data for this cross-sectional design study were extracted from a multicenter, prospective longitudinal study (CN-PRO-Lung 1) in China from November 2017 and January 2020. The inclusion criteria of patients were: aged ≥18 years, had not received any cancer therapy, did not have other cancer histories, pathologically diagnosed as lung cancer, and received surgical treatment. Most of the patients received the histological diagnosis after surgery.

Data Collection

The electronic medical record system provided demographic, surgical and pathological data. In this analysis, the body mass index (BMI) of Chinese adults was reclassified based on heterogeneity in the Chinese population. Individuals with BMI <18.5 kg/m2 were classified as low weight, 18.5–23.9 kg/m2 as average weight, 24.0–27.9 kg/m2 as overweight, and ≥28.0 kg/m2 as obese.12 The symptoms reported by patients were derived from the definition of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Lung Cancer Module (MDASI-LC), a validated PRO system designed to assess the severity of multiple symptoms experienced by lung cancer patients.9,13–15 MDASI-LC includes 16 treatment-related core symptoms and 6 daily functional impairment caused by symptoms, with a recall period of 24 hours. The severity score for each symptom ranges from 0 to 10 points with 0 being asymptomatic, 1–3 being mild symptoms, 4–6 being moderate symptoms, 7 or greater being severe symptoms, and 10 being extreme symptoms.16 MDASI-LC has been recognized an effective and essential tool for quantifying the overall symptom burden for patients with lung cancer.17 All the patients filled out the MDASI-LC questionnaire before surgery. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) is adopted for data management, and all data are finally entered into the project database of this system. The REDCap system was introduced to our hospital by the end of 2017 and hosted at the server of Sichuan Cancer Hospital.18,19

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS V23.0 software. Symptom items with missing were excluded from the analysis for the corresponding patient. Demographic data, clinical data, and PROs were presented as numbers and percentages and compared using the Chi-squared test. A two-sided P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Basic Clinical Data

This study involved a total of 396 patients, comprising 209 (52.8%) male and 187 (47.2%) female. Over 60% of the patients were aged ≤60 years (65.2%) and 62.1% had no history of smoking. The majority had adenocarcinoma (82.1%) and early-stage disease (64.6%).20 The American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of most patients was 0–1 (97.2%). Most patients had a BMI between 18.5 and 23.9 (60.9%) and 70.5% presented Charlson Comorbidity Index more than 1 (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic and Basic Clinical Characteristics of the 396 Patients

VariablesNumber (%)
Age (years)
 ≤60258 (65.2)
 >60138 (34.8)
Gender
 Male209 (52.8)
 Female187 (47.2)
Chief complaint
 No201 (50.8)
 Yes195 (49.2)
Smoking history
 No246 (62.1)
 Yes150 (37.9)
Pathological type
 Adenocarcinoma325 (82.1)
 Non-adenocarcinoma71 (17.9)
Pathological tumor stage
 0–I256 (64.6)
 II–IV140 (35.4)
ASA classification
 0–I385 (97.2)
 II–IV11 (2.8)
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)
 <18.518 (4.5)
 18.5–23.9241 (60.9)
 ≥24.0137 (34.6)
Charlson Comorbidity Index
 0117 (29.5)
 1–5279 (70.5)

Abbreviation: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Demographic and Basic Clinical Characteristics of the 396 Patients Abbreviation: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Chief Complaints

Out of the 396 patients, 201 patients found by physical examination were without chief complaints at admission. In the group of patients without chief complaints, many patients had lung masses found on annual physical examination by chest CT scan. Some lung cancers were detected due to additional check-up for other diseases, and a few were detected due to CT screening programme. And 195 patients had chief complaints. The top 5 chief complaints were coughing (38.1%), expectoration (25.5%), chest pain (13.6%), hemoptysis (10.6%) and shortness of breath (5.3%) (Table 2).
Table 2

The Chief Complaints of the 396 Patients

SymptomsNumber (%)
Incidental finding and asymptomatic201 (50.8)
Coughing151 (38.1)
Expectoration101 (25.5)
Chest pain54 (13.6)
Hemoptysis42 (10.6)
Shortness of breath21 (5.3)
Chest distress15 (3.8)
Back pain14 (3.5)
Other symptoms13 (3.3)
Fever8 (2.0)
Fatigue7 (1.8)
Headache6 (1.5)
Weight loss5 (1.3)
Shoulder pain4 (1.0)
Hoarseness3 (0.8)
Other signs3 (0.8)
Abdominal pain2 (0.5)
Nausea1 (0.3)
Vomiting1 (0.3)
Palpitation1 (0.3)
The Chief Complaints of the 396 Patients

Comparison of Same Chief Complaints and Patient-Reported Symptoms

The chief complaints were compared with the same symptoms assessed by MDASI-LC. There were significantly more patients with chief complaints of coughing (38.1% vs 14.9%, P <0.001) and pain (20.5% vs 6.8%, P <0.001) than those with the same symptoms rated ≥4 via MDASI-LC. There were less patients with chief complaints of fatigue (1.8% vs 10.9%, P <0.001), nausea (0.3% vs 2.5%, P=0.006), and vomiting (0.3% vs 1.8%, P=0.032) than those with same symptoms rated ≥4 via MDASI-LC (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of Same Chief Complaints and Patient-Reported Symptoms

SymptomChief Complaint, n (%)MDASI-LC Item Rated ≥4, n (%)P value
Coughing151 (38.1)59 (14.9)<0.001
Pain81 (20.5)27 (6.8)<0.001
Shortness of breath21 (5.3)31 (7.8)0.146
Fatigue7 (1.8)43 (10.9)<0.001
Nausea1 (0.3)10 (2.5)0.006
Vomiting1 (0.3)7 (1.8)0.032
Comparison of Same Chief Complaints and Patient-Reported Symptoms

Patient-Reported Symptoms in Patients without Chief Complaints

In patients without chief complaints, the most prevalent (MDASI-LC item rated ≥1) patient-reported symptoms were disturbed sleep (49%), dry mouth (49%), difficulty remembering (46.2%), coughing (46%), and fatigue (36%). The most common moderate to severe patient-reported (MDASI-LC item rated ≥4) symptoms were disturbed sleep (19.5%), distress (13.5%), dry mouth (13%), sadness (12%), and difficulty remembering (11.1%) (Table 4).
Table 4

Patient-Reported Symptoms in Patients without Chief Complaints

SymptomsAvailable Cases (N)MDASI-LC Item Rated ≥1, n (%)MDASI-LC Item Rated ≥4, n (%)
Disturbed sleep20098 (49)39 (19.5)
Dry mouth20098 (49)26 (13)
Difficulty remembering19992 (46.2)22 (11.1)
Coughing20092 (46)13 (6.5)
Fatigue20072 (36)17 (8.5)
Drowsiness20172 (35.8)11 (5.5)
Distress20066 (33)27 (13.5)
Sadness20060 (30)24 (12)
Constipation20059 (29.5)19 (9.5)
Lack of appetite20159 (29.4)8 (4.0)
Shortness of breath20158 (28.9)9 (4.5)
Sore throat20057 (28.5)7 (3.5)
Numbness or tingling20137 (18.4)4 (2.0)
Pain20034 (17)8 (4)
Nausea19923 (11.6)5 (2.5)
Vomiting20119 (9.5)6 (3.0)
Patient-Reported Symptoms in Patients without Chief Complaints

Discussion

In this study, we found that symptom patterns from chief complaints were different from patient-reported symptoms. This study showed that currently the majority of lung cancer patients had no chief complaints before surgery. However, symptoms not included in the chief complaints have been identified via a PRO instrument, suggesting the need to implement the PRO assessment before lung cancer surgery for better patient care. A study by Birring et al showed that coughing, hemoptysis, and chest pain were the most common complaints of lung cancer patients.2 However, the most common complaints of subjects revealed in our study were coughing, expectoration, and chest pain. The likely reason for this inconsistency is that Birring’s analysis targeted lung cancer patients with all stages of disease whereas our patients were mostly in the early lung cancer stages. Our results, in accordance with other recent studies,10,21 suggested that PRO may be an essential supplement to evaluate symptoms from traditional standard chief complaints. It is generally believed that patients with symptoms reported ≥ 4 is thought to be reflected in the chief complaint, such as fatigue, nausea, and vomiting, but coughing and pain are not. Our research showed there were significantly more patients with chief complaints of coughing and pain than those with the same symptoms rated ≥4 via MDASI-LC. The possible explanation is that the intense discomfort caused by coughing and pain is more likely to affect a patient’s daily life, and thus more easily attract attention. The systemic symptoms of fatigue, nausea, and vomiting attract less attention and so are less likely to be reflected through the chief complaint, indicating that some general symptoms will not be contemplated by the chief complaint but need to be reflected by the PRO. Therefore, future clinical work probably needs to focus more on the patient’s psychological state. Previous studies have proven the importance of identifying initial signs for early diagnosis of lung cancer.22 Lung cancer patients often have respiratory symptoms at the onset of lung cancer, the most common being coughing, hemoptysis and chest pain. But now more lung cancer patients are found by physical examination. The most common symptoms noticed after physical examinations are disturbed sleep, dry mouth, difficulty remembering, sadness, and fatigue. A study by Mendoza et al revealed that a large proportion of patients with lung cancer are symptomatic.23 Precise awareness of the primary burden of symptoms is not only useful in evaluating patient-specific therapies but is also crucial in separating disease-related symptoms from potential future treatment-related symptoms. PRO can detect some underlying symptoms. The patient’s chief complaint does not include any psychological symptoms, and if the doctor does not ask, the patients will not complain. PRO assessment does not involve a doctor and is more comprehensive than chief complaint assessment.24 Some potential symptoms (mostly non-specific or psychological symptoms) are difficult to identify during the chief complaint of patients. Through our research, we can more accurately and comprehensively evaluate the symptoms of patients, especially psychological problems. In this study, the most common moderate-to-severe patient-reported symptoms before surgery were disturbed sleep, distress, dry mouth, sadness, and difficulty remembering. Clinically, the above symptoms without chief complaint are not evaluated or treated, while according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, the most common moderate-to-severe patient-reported symptoms of distress need to be addressed.25 All of these symptoms may affect the patient’s postoperative recovery and quality of life. When patients report their symptoms, problems, and concerns and nurses and physicians received the resulting assessment summaries, the clinicians addressed significantly more symptoms and problems in patients’ reflection. Patients also reported less symptom distress and need for symptom management support over time during treatment and rehabilitation.26 An PRO system with the functionality to apply clinical algorithms to automatically alert clinicians in real-time of atypical symptoms has the potential to improve symptom control, patient safety and outcomes and decrease emergency admissions, with the additional potential of healthcare cost savings.27 And the use of PRO in clinical practice seems to be most effective in increasing patient satisfaction with communication about emotional concerns.28 This study has several limitations. Firstly, MDASI-LC is a specific scale for lung cancer, but it was developed and verified in lung cancer patients with chemoradiotherapy, and its symptom items may not completely represent the symptoms of patients undergoing surgery. However, no surgery-specific scale is currently available for lung cancer. Secondly, although the population in this study was large, all patients were from Sichuan Province, thus limiting the ability to generalize findings to all of China. However, our lung cancer data were basically consistent with the global data,29 so our study findings may also apply at the global level.

Conclusions

Our study highlights the importance of PRO for the management of lung cancer. Currently, the chief complaints of lung cancer patients have gradually changed. These findings suggest that implementing the PRO assessment before lung cancer surgery is necessary for better patient care.
  29 in total

1.  Measuring the symptom burden of lung cancer: the validity and utility of the lung cancer module of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  Tito R Mendoza; Xin Shelley Wang; Charles Lu; Guadalupe R Palos; Zhongxing Liao; Gary M Mobley; Shitij Kapoor; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-02-01

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Effects of a computer-supported interactive tailored patient assessment tool on patient care, symptom distress, and patients' need for symptom management support: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ruland; Harald H Holte; Jo Røislien; Cathy Heaven; Glenys A Hamilton; Jørn Kristiansen; Heidi Sandbaek; Stein O Kvaløy; Line Hasund; Misoo C Ellison
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Nan E Rothrock; Esi M DeWitt; Brennan Spiegel; Carole A Tucker; Heidi M Crane; Christopher B Forrest; Donald L Patrick; Rob Fredericksen; Lisa M Shulman; David Cella; Paul K Crane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Lung Cancer 2020: Epidemiology, Etiology, and Prevention.

Authors:  Brett C Bade; Charles S Dela Cruz
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.878

6.  Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; T R Mendoza; X S Wang; C Chou; M T Harle; M Morrissey; M C Engstrom
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Symptom recovery after thoracic surgery: Measuring patient-reported outcomes with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  Christopher P Fagundes; Qiuling Shi; Ara A Vaporciyan; David C Rice; Keyuri U Popat; Charles S Cleeland; Xin Shelley Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Developing a real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following cancer-related surgery.

Authors:  Kerry N L Avery; Hollie S Richards; Amanda Portal; Trudy Reed; Ruth Harding; Robert Carter; Leon Bamforth; Kate Absolom; Elaine O'Connell Francischetto; Galina Velikova; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Individual Prognosis of Symptom Burden and Functioning in Chronic Diseases: A Generic Method Based on Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures.

Authors:  Niels Henrik Ingvar Hjollund
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Developing and validating utility parameters to establish patient-reported outcome-based perioperative symptom management in patients with lung cancer: a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study protocol.

Authors:  Wei Dai; Shaohua Xie; Rui Zhang; Xing Wei; Chuanmei Wu; Yuanqiang Zhang; Wenhong Feng; Xiaoqing Liao; Yunfei Mu; Heling Zhou; Xuemei Cheng; Yanhua Jiang; Jintao He; Qiang Li; Xiaojun Yang; Qiuling Shi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.