| Literature DB >> 34078282 |
Gokulan Pararajasingam1, Laurits Juhl Heinsen2, Johanna Larsson2, Thomas Rueskov Andersen2, Brian Bridal Løgstrup3, Søren Auscher4, Jørgen Hangaard5, Rasmus Møgelvang2,6, Kenneth Egstrup2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reduced left ventricular function, assessed by global longitudinal strain (GLS), is sometimes observed in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and is often present in patients with diabetes-related microvascular complications. Our aim was to assess the association between microvascular complications, coronary artery plaque burden (PB) and GLS in asymptomatic patients with DM and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).Entities:
Keywords: Asymptomatic; Diabetes mellitus; Echocardiography; Global longitudinal strain; Microvascular complications; Plaque burden
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34078282 PMCID: PMC8173786 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02063-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1STROBE flowchart. STROBE Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology; CCTA coronary computed tomography angiography; CAD coronary artery disease; GLS global longitudinal strain; T1D type 1 diabetes; T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus
Characteristics of clinical data, biochemistry and medication stratified by microvascular complications
| No complications (n = 111) | Any complications (n = 111) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical | |||
| Age (years) | 58 ± 9 | 59 ± 10 | ns |
| Men, n (%) | 67 (60) | 84 (76) | 0.01 |
| Height (cm) | 174 ± 9 | 176 ± 9 | ns |
| Weight (kg) | 90 ± 17 | 93 ± 17 | ns |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30 ± 5 | 30 ± 5 | ns |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 64 (58) | 73 (66) | ns |
| Hyperlipidaemia, n (%) | 77 (69) | 82 (74) | ns |
| Familial predisposition to IHD, n (%) | 16 (14) | 13 (12) | ns |
| Smoking exposure (pack-years) [IQR] | 2 [0–25] | 9 [0–29] | ns * |
| MAP (mmHg) | 103 ± 10 | 104 ± 10 | ns |
| HR (beats/minute) | 67 ± 13 | 71 ± 12 | 0.03 |
| Diabetes duration (years) | 11 ± 9 | 16 ± 11 | < 0.001 |
| T2DM, n (%) | 88 (79) | 84 (76) | ns |
| Biochemistry | |||
| Haemoglobin (mmol/L) | 8.6 ± 0.7 | 8.5 ± 0.9 | ns |
| eGFR (ml/min/m2) | 75 ± 9 | 72 ± 12 | 0.05 |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 59 ± 13 | 63 ± 15 | 0.02 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 2.2 ± 0.9 | ns |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | ns |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 4.2 ± 1.1 | ns |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) [IQR] | 1.5 [1.1–2.4] | 1.6 [1.0–2.5] | ns* |
| Troponin T (ng/L) [IQR] | 6 [4–9] | 8 [5–12] | 0.01* |
| UACR (mg/g) [IQR] | 9 [5–13] | 24 [8–69] | < 0.001* |
| Medication | |||
| Acetylsalicylic acid, n (%) | 6 (5) | 16 (14) | 0.03 |
| Clopidogrel, n (%) | 2 (2) | 6 (5) | ns |
| Beta blockers, n (%) | 12 (11) | 10 (9) | ns |
| Statins, n (%) | 69 (62) | 77 (69) | ns |
| ACE inhibitor/ARB, n (%) | 59 (53) | 69 (62) | ns |
| Calcium blockers, n (%) | 19 (17) | 33 (29) | 0.03 |
| Diuretics, n (%) | 31 (28) | 37 (33) | ns |
| Biguanides, n (%) | 73 (66) | 70 (63) | ns |
| SGLT-2 inhibitor, n (%) | 8 (7) | 9 (8) | ns |
| DDP-4 inhibitor, n (%) | 16 (14) | 16 (14) | ns |
| Sulfonylureas, n (%) | 13 (12) | 19 (17) | ns |
| GLP-1 receptor agonists, n (%) | 17 (15) | 22 (20) | ns |
| Insulin, n (%) | 52 (47) | 64 (58) | ns |
ns not significant; BMI body mass index; IHD ischaemic heart disease; IQR interquartile range; MAP mean arterial pressure; HR heart rate; T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus; eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c glycated haemoglobin A1c; LDL low-density lipoprotein; HDL high-density lipoprotein; UACR urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio; ACE angiotensin converting enzyme; ARB aldosterone receptor blocker; SGLT-2 inhibitor sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor; DPP-4 dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor; GLP-1 agonists glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists
*Comparison of medians between patients with and without microvascular complications
Fig. 2Burden of microvascular complications and subgroups of microvascular complications in 222 patients. Pie charts with an overview of microvascular complications. A) Distribution of patients with a number of microvascular complications ranging from 0 to 3. B) Distribution of patients with albuminuria. C) Distribution of patients with peripheral neuropathy. D) Distribution of patients with diabetic retinopathy. NPDR non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Overview of subgroups of microvascular complications in 222 patients
| No microvascular complications (n = 111) | 1 microvascular complication (n = 75) | 2–3 microvascular complications (n = 36) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albuminuria* | |||
| No albuminuria | 111 (100) | 47 (63) | 12 (33) |
| Microalbuminuria | 0 (0) | 25 (33) | 23 (64) |
| Macroalbuminuria | 0 (0) | 3 (4) | 1 (3) |
| Nephropathy | |||
| No CKD | 7 (6) | 2 (3) | 3 (8) |
| Mild CKD | 96 (86) | 65 (87) | 29 (81) |
| Moderate CKD (stage IIIa) | 8 (7) | 8 (11) | 4 (11) |
| Diabetic retinopathy* | |||
| No retinopathy | 104 (94) | 45 (60) | 4 (11) |
| Mild NPDR | 0 (0) | 15 (20) | 11 (30.5) |
| Moderate NPDR | 0 (0) | 8 (11) | 11 (30.5) |
| Severe NPDR | 0 (0) | 2 (3) | 5 (14) |
| PDR | 0 (0) | 4 (5) | 5 (14) |
| Peripheral neuropathy* | |||
| Normal sensitivity | 87 (78) | 48 (64) | 9 (25) |
| Reduced sensitivity | 0 (0) | 17 (23) | 24 (67) |
| No sensitivity | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 3 (8) |
CKD chronic kidney disease; NPDR non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR proliferative diabetic retinopathy
*Only albuminuria, diabetic retinopathy and peripheral neuropathy were considered as microvascular complications
Characteristics of echocardiographic and CCTA parameters stratified by microvascular complications in 222 patients
| No microvascular complications (n = 111) | 1 microvascular complications (n = 75) | 2–3 microvascular complications (n = 36) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Echocardiography | ||||
| LVEF (%) | 56 ± 5 | 54 ± 6 | 55 ± 5 | ns |
| GLS (%) | − 16.4 ± 2.5 | − 16.0 ± 2.5 | − 14.9 ± 2.8 | 0.01 |
| LAVI (ml/m2) | 22 ± 7 | 23 ± 7 | 21 ± 5 | ns |
| LVMI (g/m2) | 71 ± 23 | 77 ± 21 | 71 ± 19 | ns |
| e’ (cm/sec) | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.03 |
| IVRT (msec) | 82 ± 20 | 84 ± 17 | 83 ± 17 | ns |
| E/e’ | 9.2 ± 2.9 | 9.7 ± 3.1 | 10.0 ± 2.7 | ns |
| E/A | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | ns |
| DCT (msec) | 221 ± 56 | 221 ± 53 | 209 ± 44 | ns |
| Computed tomography | ||||
| CAC [IQR] | 39 [0–239] | 22 [0–180] | 130 [30–720] | ns* |
| PB (%) | 20 ± 17 | 22 ± 16 | 27 ± 18 | ns |
| PB LAD/LM (%) | 36 ± 11 | 35 ± 9 | 40 ± 11 | ns |
| PB RCA (%) | 26 ± 8 | 27 ± 10 | 30 ± 11 | ns |
| PB CX (%) | 33 ± 12 | 31 ± 11 | 37 ± 13 | ns |
CCTA coronary computed tomography angiography; ns not significant; LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction; GLS global longitudinal strain; LAVI left atrial volume indexed; LVMI left ventricular mass indexed; e’ tissue Doppler average early diastolic mitral annulus velocity; IVRT tissue Doppler average isovolumetric relaxation time; E/é ratio of transmitral Doppler early peak velocity (E) and tissue Doppler average early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (e'); E/A ratio of transmitral Doppler early peak velocity (E) and transmitral Doppler peak late velocity (A); DCT deceleration time; CAC coronary artery calcium; IQR interquartile range; PB plaque burden; LAD/LM left anterior descending coronary artery/left main; RCA right coronary artery; CX circumflex artery
*Comparison of medians between patients with and without microvascular complications
Fig. 3Box plot of global longitudinal strain stratified by diabetes-related microvascular complications in 222 patients. Boxplot with median global longitudinal strain and corresponding interquartile range. The whiskers represent the variability outside the interquartile range and dots outside the whiskers are statistical outliers.*Cuzick’s test for trend across groups
Fig. 4Scatter plot of global longitudinal strain and total plaque burden in 152 patients with plaque volumes > 0 mm3. Two-way scatterplot with dots representing total plaque burden plotted against global longitudinal strain with a regression line (r represents the slope of the best linear fit)
Uni- and multivariable linear regression models of global longitudinal strain in 222 patients
| Clinical | Univariable | Multivariable* | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | |||||
| Age (years) | 0.01 | − 0.03 | 0.04 | ns | ||||
| Men | 0.60 | − 0.13 | 1.34 | ns | ||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.21 | < 0.001 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.01 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.10 | < 0.001 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
| Diabetes duration (years) | − 0.03 | − 0.06 | 0.01 | ns | ||||
| Microvascular complications | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.82 | < 0.001 | 0.50 | 0.11 | 0.88 | 0.01 |
| Biochemistry | ||||||||
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 0.01 | − 0.01 | 0.04 | ns | ||||
| Medication | ||||||||
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 0.06 | − 1.09 | 1.22 | ns | ||||
| Calcium blockers | 0.02 | − 0.79 | 0.84 | ns | ||||
| Type of diabetes | ||||||||
| T2DM | 1.30 | 0.50 | 2.11 | 0.01 | 0.56 | − 0.26 | 1.39 | ns |
| Echocardiography | ||||||||
| e’ (cm/sec) | − 19.8 | − 30.2 | − 9.42 | < 0.001 | − 12.7 | − 22.8 | − 2.54 | 0.02 |
| Computed tomography | ||||||||
| PB (%) | 0.01 | − 0.01 | 0.03 | ns | ||||
β beta coefficient; 95% CI 95% confidence interval; ns not significant; BMI body mass index; MAP mean arterial pressure; HbA1c glycated haemoglobin A1c; T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus; e’ tissue Doppler average early diastolic mitral annulus velocity; PB plaque burden
*Data were available for 213 patients