Literature DB >> 34078100

Toward Dynamic Risk Prediction of Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Improving Risk Prediction With Intraoperative Events Using Gradient Boosting.

Makoto Mori1,2, Thomas J S Durant1,3, Chenxi Huang1,4, Bobak J Mortazavi1,5, Andreas Coppi1,2,4, Raymond A Jean1, Arnar Geirsson, Wade L Schulz1,3, Harlan M Krumholz1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative data may improve models predicting postoperative events. We evaluated the effect of incorporating intraoperative variables to the existing preoperative model on the predictive performance of the model for coronary artery bypass graft.
METHODS: We analyzed 378 572 isolated coronary artery bypass graft cases performed across 1083 centers, using the national Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between 2014 and 2016. Outcomes were operative mortality, 5 postoperative complications, and composite representation of all events. We fitted models by logistic regression or extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). For each modeling approach, we used preoperative only, intraoperative only, or pre+intraoperative variables. We developed 84 models with unique combinations of the 3 variable sets, 2 variable selection methods, 2 modeling approaches, and 7 outcomes. Each model was tested in 20 iterations of 70:30 stratified random splitting into development/testing samples. Model performances were evaluated on the testing dataset using the C statistic, area under the precision-recall curve, and calibration metrics, including the Brier score.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 65.3 years, and 24.7% were women. Operative mortality, excluding intraoperative death, occurred in 1.9%. In all outcomes, models that considered pre+intraoperative variables demonstrated significantly improved Brier score and area under the precision-recall curve compared with models considering pre or intraoperative variables alone. XGBoost without external variable selection had the best C statistics, Brier score, and area under the precision-recall curve values in 4 of the 7 outcomes (mortality, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and composite) compared with logistic regression models with or without variable selection. Based on the calibration plots, risk restratification for mortality showed that the logistic regression model underestimated the risk in 11 114 patients (9.8%) and overestimated in 12 005 patients (10.6%). In contrast, the XGBoost model underestimated the risk in 7218 patients (6.4%) and overestimated in 0 patients (0%).
CONCLUSIONS: In isolated coronary artery bypass graft, adding intraoperative variables to preoperative variables resulted in improved predictions of all 7 outcomes. Risk models based on XGBoost may provide a better prediction of adverse events to guide clinical care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benchmarking; coronary artery bypass; machine learning; medical informatics; probability learning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34078100      PMCID: PMC8635167          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  15 in total

1.  Intraoperative systolic blood pressure variability predicts 30-day mortality in aortocoronary bypass surgery patients.

Authors:  Solomon Aronson; Mark Stafford-Smith; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Andrew Shaw; Jeffrey Gaca; Mark Newman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Development and Validation of a Deep-Learning Model to Screen for Hyperkalemia From the Electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Conner D Galloway; Alexander V Valys; Jacqueline B Shreibati; Daniel L Treiman; Frank L Petterson; Vivek P Gundotra; David E Albert; Zachi I Attia; Rickey E Carter; Samuel J Asirvatham; Michael J Ackerman; Peter A Noseworthy; John J Dillon; Paul A Friedman
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 1-Background, Design Considerations, and Model Development.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Vinay Badhwar; Paul A Kurlansky; Anthony P Furnary; Joseph C Cleveland; Kevin W Lobdell; Christina Vassileva; Moritz C Wyler von Ballmoos; Vinod H Thourani; J Scott Rankin; James R Edgerton; Richard S D'Agostino; Nimesh D Desai; Liqi Feng; Xia He; Sean M O'Brien
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Sean M O'Brien; Giovanni Filardo; Victor A Ferraris; Constance K Haan; Jeffrey B Rich; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Elizabeth R DeLong; Cynthia M Shewan; Rachel S Dokholyan; Eric D Peterson; Fred H Edwards; Richard P Anderson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Calibration belt for quality-of-care assessment based on dichotomous outcomes.

Authors:  Stefano Finazzi; Daniele Poole; Davide Luciani; Paola E Cogo; Guido Bertolini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Deep Patient: An Unsupervised Representation to Predict the Future of Patients from the Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Riccardo Miotto; Li Li; Brian A Kidd; Joel T Dudley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With National Cardiovascular Data Registry Models for Prediction of Risk of Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Bobak J Mortazavi; Emily M Bucholz; Nihar R Desai; Chenxi Huang; Jeptha P Curtis; Frederick A Masoudi; Richard E Shaw; Sahand N Negahban; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-07-03

9.  Disrupting Electronic Health Records Systems: The Next Generation.

Authors:  Leo Anthony Celi; Jeffrey David Marshall; Yuan Lai; David J Stone
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2015-10-23

10.  Enhancing the prediction of acute kidney injury risk after percutaneous coronary intervention using machine learning techniques: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chenxi Huang; Karthik Murugiah; Shiwani Mahajan; Shu-Xia Li; Sanket S Dhruva; Julian S Haimovich; Yongfei Wang; Wade L Schulz; Jeffrey M Testani; Francis P Wilson; Carlos I Mena; Frederick A Masoudi; John S Rumsfeld; John A Spertus; Bobak J Mortazavi; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Long-Term Mortality in Patients After Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Chi Peng; Zhiyuan Zhang; Kejia Shen; Yufeng Zhang; Jian Xiao; Wang Xi; Pei Wang; Jin Rao; Zhichao Jin; Zhinong Wang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.