Literature DB >> 34075486

Failure to Meet Same-Day Discharge is Not a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes.

Vivek Singh1, Afamefuna M Nduaguba1, William Macaulay1, Ran Schwarzkopf1, Roy I Davidovitch2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As more centers introduce same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) programs, it is vital to understand the factors associated with successful outpatient TJA and whether outcomes vary for those that failed SDD. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of patients that are successfully discharged home the day of surgery to those that fail-to-launch (FTL) and require a longer in-hospital stay.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who enrolled in our institution's SDD TJA program from 2015 to 2020. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on whether they were successfully SDD or FTL. Outcomes of interest included discharge disposition, 90-day readmissions, 90-day revisions, surgical time, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as assessed by the FJS-12 (3 months, 1 year, and 2 years), HOOS, JR, and KOOS, JR (preoperatively, 3 months, and 1 year). Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Outcomes were compared using multilinear regressions, controlling for demographic differences.
RESULTS: A total of 1491 patients were included. Of these, 1384 (93%) were successfully SDD while 107 (7%) FTL and required a longer length-of-stay. Patients who FTL were more likely to be non-married (p = 0.007) and ASA class III (p = 0.017) compared to those who were successfully SDD. Surgical time was significantly longer for those who FTL compared to those who were successfully SDD (100.86 vs. 83.42 min; p < 0.001). Discharge disposition (p = 0.100), 90-day readmissions (p = 0.897), 90-day revisions (p = 0.997), and all PROM scores both preoperatively and postoperatively did not significantly differ between the two cohorts.
CONCLUSION: Our results support the notion that FTL is not a predictor of adverse outcomes as patients who FTL achieved similar outcomes as those who were successfully SDD. The findings of this study can aid orthopedic surgeons to educate their patients who wish to participate in a similar program, as well as patients that have concerns after they failed to go home on the day of surgery. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failure to launch; Outpatient; Same-day discharge; Total hip arthroplasty; Total joint arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34075486     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03983-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  38 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Douglas W Wilmore
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Defining growth potential and barriers to same day discharge total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Megan E Gillis; Johanna Dobransky; Geoffrey F Dervin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Length of Hospitalization After Joint Arthroplasty: Does Early Discharge Affect Complications and Readmission Rates?

Authors:  Jesse E Otero; J Joseph Gholson; Andrew J Pugely; Yubo Gao; Nicholas A Bedard; John J Callaghan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  A Novel Opioid-Sparing Pain Management Protocol Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Effects on Opioid Consumption, Pain Severity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Jorge A Padilla; Jonathan A Gabor; Ran Schwarzkopf; Roy I Davidovitch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Nonelective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Effect of Discharge Destination on Postdischarge Outcomes.

Authors:  Chirag K Shah; Aakash Keswani; Debbie Chi; Alex Sher; Karl M Koenig; Calin S Moucha
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Gender Differences in Wear Rates for 28- vs 32-mm Ceramic Femoral Heads on Modern Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene at Midterm Follow-Up in Young Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Stambough; Gail Pashos; Ningying Wu; Jacob A Haynes; John M Martell; John C Clohisy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Is Outpatient Arthroplasty as Safe as Fast-Track Inpatient Arthroplasty? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Francis Lovecchio; Hasham Alvi; Shawn Sahota; Matthew Beal; David Manning
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Has Minimal Short-Term Complications With the Use of Institutional Protocols.

Authors:  Mitchell C Weiser; Kelvin Y Kim; Afshin A Anoushiravani; Richard Iorio; Roy I Davidovitch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Reduced short-term complications and mortality following Enhanced Recovery primary hip and knee arthroplasty: results from 6,000 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Sameer K Khan; Ajay Malviya; Scott D Muller; Ian Carluke; Paul F Partington; Kevin P Emmerson; Mike R Reed
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement: a population-based study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Authors:  Edward Burn; Alexander D Liddle; Thomas W Hamilton; Andrew Judge; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.