Irit R Rasooly1,2,3,4, Andrew S Kern-Goldberger5, Rui Xiao6, Siddarth Ponnala7, Halley Ruppel8, Brooke Luo5,2,4, Sansanee Craig2,4, Amina Khan7, Melissa McLoone9, Daria Ferro5,2,4, Naveen Muthu5,2,4, James Won4,7, Christopher P Bonafide5,2,3,4. 1. Section of Pediatric Hospital Medicine rasoolyi@chop.edu. 2. Departments of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 3. Centers for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness. 4. Departments of Pediatrics. 5. Section of Pediatric Hospital Medicine. 6. Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and. 7. Healthcare Quality and Analytics. 8. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California. 9. Nursing Practice and Education, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Physiologic monitor alarms occur at high rates in children's hospitals; ≤1% are actionable. The burden of alarms has implications for patient safety and is challenging to measure directly. Nurse workload, measured by using a version of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) validated among nurses, is a useful indicator of work burden that has been associated with patient outcomes. A recent study revealed that 5-point increases in the NASA-TLX score were associated with a 22% increased risk in missed nursing care. Our objective was to measure the relationship between alarm count and nurse workload by using the NASA-TLX. METHODS: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of pediatric nurses in a tertiary care children's hospital to measure the association between NASA-TLX workload evaluations (using the nurse-validated scale) and alarm count in the 2 hours preceding NASA-TLX administration. Using a multivariable mixed-effects regression accounting for nurse-level clustering, we modeled the adjusted association of alarm count with workload. RESULTS: The NASA-TLX score was assessed in 26 nurses during 394 nursing shifts over a 2-month period. In adjusted regression models, experiencing >40 alarms in the preceding 2 hours was associated with a 5.5 point increase (95% confidence interval 5.2 to 5.7; P < .001) in subjective workload. CONCLUSION: Alarm count in the preceding 2 hours is associated with a significant increase in subjective nurse workload that exceeds the threshold associated with increased risk of missed nursing care and potential patient harm.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Physiologic monitor alarms occur at high rates in children's hospitals; ≤1% are actionable. The burden of alarms has implications for patient safety and is challenging to measure directly. Nurse workload, measured by using a version of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) validated among nurses, is a useful indicator of work burden that has been associated with patient outcomes. A recent study revealed that 5-point increases in the NASA-TLX score were associated with a 22% increased risk in missed nursing care. Our objective was to measure the relationship between alarm count and nurse workload by using the NASA-TLX. METHODS: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of pediatric nurses in a tertiary care children's hospital to measure the association between NASA-TLX workload evaluations (using the nurse-validated scale) and alarm count in the 2 hours preceding NASA-TLX administration. Using a multivariable mixed-effects regression accounting for nurse-level clustering, we modeled the adjusted association of alarm count with workload. RESULTS: The NASA-TLX score was assessed in 26 nurses during 394 nursing shifts over a 2-month period. In adjusted regression models, experiencing >40 alarms in the preceding 2 hours was associated with a 5.5 point increase (95% confidence interval 5.2 to 5.7; P < .001) in subjective workload. CONCLUSION: Alarm count in the preceding 2 hours is associated with a significant increase in subjective nurse workload that exceeds the threshold associated with increased risk of missed nursing care and potential patient harm.
Authors: Christopher P Bonafide; Richard Lin; Miriam Zander; Christian Sarkis Graham; Christine W Paine; Whitney Rock; Andrew Rich; Kathryn E Roberts; Margaret Fortino; Vinay M Nadkarni; A Russell Localio; Ron Keren Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Amanda C Schondelmeyer; Christopher P Bonafide; Veena V Goel; Nancy Blake; Maria Cvach; Heidi Sucharew; Jeffrey M Simmons; Patrick W Brady Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Heather L Tubbs-Cooley; Constance A Mara; Adam C Carle; Barbara A Mark; Rita H Pickler Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Jeannette A Rogowski; Douglas Staiger; Thelma Patrick; Jeffrey Horbar; Michael Kenny; Eileen T Lake Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Brenda L Minor; Veida Elliott; Michelle Fernandez; Lindsay O'Neal; Laura McLeod; Giovanni Delacqua; Francesco Delacqua; Jacqueline Kirby; Stephany N Duda Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Amanda C Schondelmeyer; Patrick W Brady; Veena V Goel; Maria Cvach; Nancy Blake; Colleen Mangeot; Christopher P Bonafide Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Irit R Rasooly; Spandana Makeneni; Amina N Khan; Brooke Luo; Naveen Muthu; Christopher P Bonafide Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Amanda C Schondelmeyer; Amanda P Bettencourt; Rui Xiao; Rinad S Beidas; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Christopher P Landrigan; Patrick W Brady; Canita R Brent; Padmavathy Parthasarathy; Andrew S Kern-Goldberger; Nathaniel Sergay; Vivian Lee; Christopher J Russell; Julianne Prasto; Sarah Zaman; Kaitlyn McQuistion; Kate Lucey; Courtney Solomon; Mayra Garcia; Christopher P Bonafide Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-09-01