| Literature DB >> 34073276 |
Vladimir Gostev1,2, Olga Kalinogorskaya1, Ksenia Ivanova1, Ekaterina Kalisnikova1, Irina Lazareva1, Polina Starkova1, Sergey Sidorenko1,2.
Abstract
Selective pressure of beta-lactams is thought to be responsible for mutation selection in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). We used next-generation sequencing to compare the genomes of beta-lactamase-positive (SA0707) and -negative (SA0937) MSSA isolates with their derivatives obtained after selection with oxacillin, ceftaroline, or meropenem. Selection with oxacillin and ceftaroline caused a rapid and significant (6-8 times) increase in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) of oxacillin, penicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and ceftaroline against the derivatives of both isolates, associated with growth impairment. Selection with meropenem caused a limited increase in the MICs of all beta-lactams against both isolates. During the initial stages of selection (after 5-15 passages), mutations were detected only in some reads, which indicated the heterogeneity of the population; however, during the later stages, either the population reversed to the wild type or fixation of the mutation was observed in the entire population. Selection with different beta-lactams caused diverse mutational events, but common mutations were detected in gdpP, all penicillin-binding proteins, cell wall regulators (vraST, graR), and deletions in the promoter region of pbp4. Therefore, the disk diffusion test with cefoxitin does not reveal resistance associated with these mechanisms in some cases, which can lead to the failure of beta-lactam therapy.Entities:
Keywords: MSSA; beta-lactam resistance; ceftaroline; in vitro selection; meropenem whole genome sequencing; oxacillin; penicillin-binding proteins
Year: 2021 PMID: 34073276 PMCID: PMC8227848 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10060637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Susceptibility features of parental strains and their isogenic derivatives.
| Isolate | Ab Selection | Passage | OXA | CPT | MER | FOX | AMC | PEN | FOX DDM, mm | PAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECOFF * | ≤2 | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 | ≤4 | - | ≤0.125 | 22≤ | - | ||
| SA0937 | WT | 0 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 4 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 30 | - |
| OXA | 5 | 16 | 4 | 0.25 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 32 | 2.24 | |
| OXA | 15 | ND ** | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 27 | 2.43 | |
| OXA | 30 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 22 | 2.31 | |
| Ab free | 40 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0.25 | 23 | 1.93 | |
| CPT | 5 | 32 | 16 | 0.5 | 2 | 32 | 32 | 27 | 2.4 | |
| CPT | 15 | 32 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 32 | 28 | 2.62 | |
| CPT | 30 | 64 | 128 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 64 | 24 | 2.69 | |
| Ab free | 40 | 2 | 4 | 0.5 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 1.48 | |
| MER | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 28 | 2.05 | |
| MER | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 2.55 | |
| MER | 30 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2.75 | |
| Ab free | 40 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 2.49 | |
| SA0707 | WT | 0 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 4 | 2 | 32 | 28 | - |
| OXA | 5 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 27 | 1.55 | |
| OXA | 15 | 32 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 32 | 64 | 29 | 2.73 | |
| OXA | 30 | 32 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 64 | 25 | 2.85 | |
| Ab free | 40 | 32 | 32 | 2 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 24 | 2.68 | |
| CPT | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 4 | 4 | 128 | 22 | 1.08 | |
| CPT | 15 | 32 | 32 | 0.5 | 8 | 32 | 32 | 24 | 2.3 | |
| CPT | 30 | 128 | 64 | 2 | 16 | 64 | 128 | 22 | 2.82 | |
| Ab free | 40 | 128 | 64 | 2 | 16 | 64 | 128 | 22 | 2.73 | |
| MER | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 16 | 28 | 1.9 | |
| MER | 15 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 2.37 | |
| MER | 30 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2.71 | |
| Ab free | 40 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 2.52 |
Abbreviations: WT, wild type strain; Ab free, passages on antibiotic-free medium after resistance selection; OXA, oxacillin; CPT, ceftaroline; MER, meropenem; FOX, cefoxitin; AMC, amoxicillin and clavulanic acid; PEN, penicillin, FOX DDM, disk-diffusion method with FOX; PAP, population analysis profile. * According to EUCAST data (https://mic.eucast.org/) accessed on 31 March 2021; ** ND—not-detectable results; derivative isolate SA0937 after selection on oxacillin could not grow in Muller-Hinton media.
Figure 1Population analysis profile (PAP) of parental isolates and their derivatives after 30 passages against oxacillin (OXA), ceftaroline (CPT), and meropenem (MER).
Phenotypic features of parental and isogenic derivatives.
| Figure | Strain | Wild Type | Antibiotics Used for Selection | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OXA | CPT | MER | |||
|
| |||||
| Dt, min | SA0937 | 27.25 (26.86–27.47) | 41.30 (39.0–42.6) | 33.53 (33.07–34.0) | 36.81 (34.2–39.5) |
| SA0707 | 25.42 (25.08–26.25) | 52.32 (51.01–53.68) | 38.31 (37.56–39.14) | 28.89 (28.02–31.23) | |
| r, min−1 | SA0937 | 0.025 (0.025–0.026) | 0.016 (0.016–0.017) | 0.02 (0.02–0.02) | 0.018 (0.017–0.02) |
| SA0707 | 0.027 (0.026–0.027) | 0.013 (0.012–0.014) | 0.018 (0.017–0.019) | 0.02 (0.019–0.021) | |
| Lag, min | SA0937 | 69–79 | 158–168 | 128–138 | 128–138 |
| SA0707 | 89–99 | 227–237 | 168–178 | 168–178 | |
|
| |||||
| OD600/lysed cells, | SA0937 | 55.8 (50.5–62.0) | 68.15 (62.4–75.3) | 35.0 (29.5–39.7) | 58.6 (53.6–64.1) |
| SA0707 | 14.0 (7.0–16.4) | 8.0 (2.0–13.0) | 14.4 (10.2–18.6) | 16.3 (10.0–19.4) | |
Notes: Dt (doubling time), median (M), and interquartile range (Q1-Q3) are shown; r, growth rate; Lag, lag phase of kinetic growth; OXA, selection on oxacillin; CPT, selection on ceftaroline; MER, selection on meropenem; OD600/lysed cells, percentage of lysed cells.
Mutations associated with CW regulon andWTA beta-lactam resistant derivative strains.
| SA0937 ( | SA0707 ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proteins | OXA | CPT | MER | OXA | CPT | MER | |
| CW | Pbp1 | - | H499R | G408V, W351L, | - | - | A482V, P431L, |
| Pbp2 | - | - | I19N, G587S, M559I, | A450D | T552I, | - | |
| Pbp3 | - | - | G286V, S634F | - | - | - | |
| Pbp4 | P ∆91 bp | P ∆1 bp, | F241L, | P ∆91 bp | P ∆91 bp | - | |
| GdpP | ∆1 bp | H621Y, R540Stop | E108Stop | Y475C | - | R289C | |
| VraS | T274K | ∆1 bp | C60Y | - | - | - | |
| VraT | P174Q | - | - | W119R | - | G226V | |
| MurAB | - | - | - | P ∆171 bp | P ∆171 bp | - | |
| GraR | - | - | - | G59E | ∆161 bp | - | |
| WTA | TagA | - | G171E | - | - | G171E | - |
| TagH | - | - | - | - | - | Q65Stop | |
| TagO | - | - | - | L323Stop | L41I | - | |
| DltA | - | - | - | - | A184V | ∆1 bp | |
| DltD | ∆236 bp | - | - | - | - | - | |
| SgtB | - | - | - | - | ∆1 bp | - | |
All mutations detected at different time points during selection and included minor mutations with allele frequency in range 10–95% are shown. P ∆-deletion in promoter regions, ∆-deletion in coding region; CW, genes involved in cell wall biosynthesis; WTA, genes involved in wall teichoic acids biosynthesis.