Literature DB >> 34072693

Serum Metabolite Profiles in Participants of Lung Cancer Screening Study; Comparison of Two Independent Cohorts.

Piotr Widłak1, Karol Jelonek1, Agata Kurczyk1, Joanna Żyła2, Magdalena Sitkiewicz3, Edoardo Bottoni4, Giulia Veronesi5,6, Joanna Polańska2, Witold Rzyman3.   

Abstract

Serum metabolome is a promising source of molecular biomarkers that could support early detection of lung cancer in screening programs based on low-dose computed tomography. Several panels of metabolites that differentiate lung cancer patients and healthy individuals were reported, yet none of them were validated in the population at high-risk of developing cancer. Here we analyzed serum metabolome profiles in participants of two lung cancer screening studies: MOLTEST-BIS (Poland, n = 369) and SMAC-1 (Italy, n = 93). Three groups of screening participants were included: lung cancer patients, individuals with benign pulmonary nodules, and those without any lung alterations. Concentrations of about 400 metabolites (lipids, amino acids, and biogenic amines) were measured by a mass spectrometry-based approach. We observed a reduced level of lipids, in particular cholesteryl esters, in sera of cancer patients from both studies. Despite several specific compounds showing significant differences between cancer patients and healthy controls within each study, only a few cancer-related features were common when both cohorts were compared, which included a reduced concentration of lysophosphatidylcholine LPC (18:0). Moreover, serum metabolome profiles in both noncancer groups were similar, and differences between cancer patients and both groups of healthy participants were comparable. Large heterogeneity in levels of specific metabolites was observed, both within and between cohorts, which markedly impaired the accuracy of classification models: The overall AUC values of three-state classifiers were 0.60 and 0.51 for the test (MOLTEST) and validation (SMAC) cohorts, respectively. Therefore, a hypothetical metabolite-based biomarker for early detection of lung cancer would require adjustment to lifestyle-related confounding factors that putatively affect the composition of serum metabolome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; early detection; lung cancer; metabolomics; screening study

Year:  2021        PMID: 34072693     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  33 in total

1.  Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods.

Authors:  W Evan Johnson; Cheng Li; Ariel Rabinovic
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  NS-kNN: a modified k-nearest neighbors approach for imputing metabolomics data.

Authors:  Justin Y Lee; Mark P Styczynski
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 4.290

3.  Results of the Randomized Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial with Focus on High-Risk Profiling.

Authors:  Mathilde M W Wille; Asger Dirksen; Haseem Ashraf; Zaigham Saghir; Karen S Bach; John Brodersen; Paul F Clementsen; Hanne Hansen; Klaus R Larsen; Jann Mortensen; Jakob F Rasmussen; Niels Seersholm; Birgit G Skov; Laura H Thomsen; Philip Tønnesen; Jesper H Pedersen
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  Biomarkers of risk to develop lung cancer in the new screening era.

Authors:  Thomas Atwater; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

5.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Carlijn M van der Aalst; Pim A de Jong; Ernst T Scholten; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Carla Weenink; Uraujh Yousaf-Khan; Nanda Horeweg; Susan van 't Westeinde; Mathias Prokop; Willem P Mali; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein; Peter M A van Ooijen; Joachim G J V Aerts; Michael A den Bakker; Erik Thunnissen; Johny Verschakelen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Joan E Walter; Kevin Ten Haaf; Harry J M Groen; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Potential biomarkers for lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Gabriella Sozzi; Mattia Boeri
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06

8.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Detection of Lung Cancer through Metabolic Changes Measured in Blood Plasma.

Authors:  Evelyne Louis; Peter Adriaensens; Wanda Guedens; Theophile Bigirumurame; Kurt Baeten; Karolien Vanhove; Kurt Vandeurzen; Karen Darquennes; Johan Vansteenkiste; Christophe Dooms; Ziv Shkedy; Liesbet Mesotten; Michiel Thomeer
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Higher plasma levels of lysophosphatidylcholine 18:0 are related to a lower risk of common cancers in a prospective metabolomics study.

Authors:  Tilman Kühn; Anna Floegel; Disorn Sookthai; Theron Johnson; Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk; Wolfgang Otto; Martin von Bergen; Heiner Boeing; Rudolf Kaaks
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.