| Literature DB >> 34072596 |
Lenka Demková1, Július Árvay2, Martin Hauptvogl3, Jana Michalková4, Marek Šnirc2, Ľuboš Harangozo2, Lenka Bobuľská1, Daniel Bajčan2, Vladimír Kunca5.
Abstract
Three edible mushroom species (Imlera badia, Boletus subtomentosus, Xerocomellus chrysenteron) sampled in 60 different localities of Slovakia were evaluated to determine health risks (associated with mercury content) arising from their consumption. Total content of mercury in soil and mushroom samples was determined by an AMA-254 analyzer. Soil pollution by mercury was evaluated by contamination factor (Cf), pollution load index (PLI), and geoaccumulation index (Igeo). Bioaccumulation factor (BAF), translocation factor (Qc/s), provisional tolerably weekly intake (%PTWI), estimated daily intake (EDI), and target hazard quotient (THQ) were used to describe and compare uptake and transition abilities of mushrooms, and the health risk arising from mushroom consumption. Mercury content in soil significantly influences the content of mercury in mushroom fruiting body parts. Caps and stipes of Boletus subtomentosus were found to be the best mercury accumulator. According to the EDI, consumption of the evaluated mushroom species represents a serious threat for adults and children. The lowest values of THQ were found for Xerocomellus chysenteron.Entities:
Keywords: Boletus subtomentosus; Imlera badia; Xerocomellus chrysenteron; bioaccumulation factor; mercury; target hazard quotient
Year: 2021 PMID: 34072596 PMCID: PMC8228305 DOI: 10.3390/jof7060434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1Wild-growing edible mushroom sampling sites.
The occurrence of individual mushroom species in the sampling localities.
| No. | Locality | Mushroom Presence and the Number of Samples | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | Badín | 4 | ||
| 2 | Bachledová Dolina | 3 | ||
| 3 | Bojná | 5 | 3 | |
| 4 | Breziny–Javorie | 4 | ||
| 5 | Čergov | 3 | 4 | |
| 6 | Čertov | 15 | ||
| 7 | Čierny Balog | 3 | 6 | |
| 8 | Divina | 3 | ||
| 9 | Dobroč-Veľká dolina | 6 | ||
| 10 | Duchonka | 6 | ||
| 11 | Hodruša-Hámre | 4 | ||
| 12 | Jabloňovce | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 13 | Jedľové Kostoľany | 3 | ||
| 14 | Jelenec pri Nitre | 3 | 4 | |
| 15 | Kolačkov | 5 | ||
| 16 | Kostoľany p. Tríbečom | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| 17 | Krajné-Podvrch | 4 | 3 | 13 |
| 18 | Krpáčovo | 12 | ||
| 19 | Kuchyňa-letisko | 10 | ||
| 20 | Lehota pod Vtáčnikom | 8 | 3 | 4 |
| 21 | Limbach | 8 | ||
| 22 | Lozorno | 5 | ||
| 23 | Ľubietová | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| 24 | Malá Franková | 7 | ||
| 25 | Malachov | 4 | 3 | |
| 26 | Malý Lipník | 3 | 3 | |
| 27 | Meandre | 5 | ||
| 28 | Moštenica | 3 | 4 | |
| 29 | Nižná Boca | 6 | ||
| 30 | Nižné Ružbachy | 4 | ||
| 31 | Nižnoslanská Baňa | 3 | ||
| 32 | Nová Baňa | 8 | 4 | |
| 33 | Bobrov | 6 | ||
| 34 | Tekovská kúria | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 35 | Osturňa | 9 | ||
| 36 | Pezinská Baba | 3 | 5 | |
| 37 | Pitelová | 5 | ||
| 38 | Pod Holicou | 4 | ||
| 39 | Počúvadlianské jazero | 4 | ||
| 40 | Rosina-Brezník | 4 | 3 | |
| 41 | Rudňany (Markušovce) | 8 | ||
| 42 | Sedlo pod Mýtom | 7 | ||
| 43 | Sekaniny | 3 | 3 | |
| 44 | Sitnianska Lehôtka | 3 | ||
| 45 | Skýcov | 6 | 16 | |
| 46 | Solčany | 3 | ||
| 47 | Smolenice | 3 | 14 | |
| 48 | Stráňany | 3 | ||
| 49 | Studienka-vojenské lesy | 15 | ||
| 50 | Súľovce | 5 | 3 | |
| 51 | Svätý Jur | 8 | ||
| 52 | Šachtička | 3 | 6 | |
| 53 | Šaštín-Stráže | 11 | 5 | |
| 54 | Špania Dolina | 5 | 7 | |
| 55 | Štiavnické Bane | 3 | ||
| 56 | Tajov | 3 | 3 | |
| 57 | Veľká Lesná | 4 | 10 | |
| 58 | Zochova Chata | 12 | 3 | 6 |
| 59 | Žemberovce | 6 | 3 | |
| 60 | Žilina | 3 | ||
Figure 2Soil pollution at the sampling localities expressed by contamination factor (Cf).
Figure 3Pollution load index (PLI) values determined for individual sampling localities.
Content of Hg (mg kg−1) in caps and stipes of three edible mushroom species expressed by descriptive statistics and the results of the Kruskal-Wallis test expressing significant differences in Hg content between species (a, p < 0.001; b, p < 0.05).
| Mushroom Species | Cap | Stipe |
|---|---|---|
| Min–Max (Median ± st.Deviation) | ||
|
| 0.01–23.7 (1.09 ± 3.46) a | 0.01–14.8 (0.49 ± 1.45) b |
|
| 0.05–2.59 (0.36 ± 0.47) | 0.03–0.99 (0.23–0.23) |
|
| 0.01–2.61 (0.31 ± 0.42) a | 0.001–1.04 (0.17 ± 0.17) b |
Spearman’s correlation relationships between the substrate and the body parts (cap, stipe) Hg content of three different mushrooms species.
| Mushroom Species | Cap | Stipe | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| substrate | 0.54 ** | 0.51 ** |
| cap | 0.78 ** | ||
|
| substrate | 0.57 ** | 0.55 ** |
| cap | 0.81 ** | ||
|
| substrate | 0.32 * | 0.48 * |
| cap | 0.69 ** |
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4Bioaccumulation factor (BAF) values in caps and stipes and translocation quotient (Qc/s) values determined for three edible mushroom species (the data were logarithmized for better visual expression).
The results of the Mann-Whitney U test expressing differences in BAF values between caps and stipes within the species.
| Mushroom Species | U | Z |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| between mushroom parts (cap/stipe) | 14,428 | 3.23 | 0.001 ** |
|
| 4118 | 2.34 | 0.01 * | |
|
| 11,263 | 4.12 | 0.001 ** |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Percentage of the PTWI estimated on Hg content (min-max (average ± st.deviation)), separately in caps and stipes of three analysed mushroom species, considering the age of the consumer. The results of the Kruskal-Wallis test expressing the significant differences (d,e p < 0.001) between species in PTWI contribution and the results of the Mann-Whitney U test expressing significant differences (a,c p < 0.001; b p < 0.05) in PTWI contribution between mushroom parts of individual mushroom species.
| Mushroom Species | Adult | Child | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cap | Stipe | Cap | Stipe | |
|
| 0.07–195 a,d | 0.11–121 a,e | 0.15–390 a,d | 0.22–242 a,e |
|
| 0.39–21.0 b | 0.23–8.09 b | 0.79–42.1 b | 0.46–16.2 b |
|
| 0.08–21.5 c,d | 0.07–8.55 c,e | 0.16–42.9 c,d | 0.15–17.1 c,e |
Figure 5The values of THQ at the sampling sites, regardless of the mushroom species.