Literature DB >> 34072592

SCA Medium: A New Culture Medium for the Isolation of All Candida auris Clades.

Ahmad Ibrahim1,2, Lucie Peyclit1,2, Rim Abdallah1,2, Saber Khelaifia1,2, Amanda Chamieh1,2, Jean-Marc Rolain1,2, Fadi Bittar1,2.   

Abstract

Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast causing nosocomial infections and associated with high mortality in immunocompromised patients. Rapid identification and characterisation are necessary for diagnosis and containing its spread. In this study, we present a selective culture medium for all C. auris clades. This medium is sensitive with a limit of detection ranging between 101 and 102 CFU/mL. The 100% specificity of SCA (specific C. auris) medium is confirmed on a set of 135 Candida strains, 50 bacterial species and 200 human stool samples. Thus, this medium specifically selects for C. auris isolation from clinical samples, allowing the latter to study its phenotypic profile.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candida; Candida auris; culture; emerging fungus; isolation; specific medium

Year:  2021        PMID: 34072592      PMCID: PMC8226795          DOI: 10.3390/jof7060433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)        ISSN: 2309-608X


1. Introduction

Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant pathogen that was first isolated in 2009 [1] and is now known to have four geographical clades: South Asia: India; East Asia: Japan; Southern Africa: South Africa; and South America: Venezuela [2]. Recently, a potential fifth clade (Clade V) has been described in Iran [3]. C. auris is a biofilm-forming, halotolerant, thermo-resistant yeast [1,4] that can grow at temperatures ranging between 30 °C and 42 °C and can tolerate up to 10% salinity [5]. This promotes the ability of C. auris to colonize various medical equipment, plastic surfaces, and nosocomial environments [2,3,4], rendering C. auris an invasive, powerful pathogen. In addition, C. auris is highly resistant to different classes of antifungal agents such as azoles, amphotericin B and echinocandins [6] and is associated with significant mortality, especially in immunocompromised patients with multiple comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, renal failure, and cardiovascular disease [2,4]. Thus, its rapid identification and characterization are necessary to optimize clinical outcomes and to attempt to contain its nosocomial and worldwide spread. The diagnosis of C. auris is challenging. The vast majority of commercial, readily available diagnostics, such as VITEK, API20C-AUX, Auxa-Color 2, BD Phoenixand MicroScan are misleading. C. auris is misidentified as other Candida species, namely Candida famata, Candida haemulonii, Candida duobushaemulonii, Candida sake, Candida lustaniae and Candida guilliermondii among others [7,8]. This often leads to delays in appropriate management and treatment. However, the use of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) is promising [7,8], since the spectrum of C. auris is available in the reference database. In addition, the user can carefully select, “hand-pick”, and isolate the corresponding identified colonies from other colonies growing on a plate. Moreover, the molecular identification and characterization of C. auris is well developed [9], and the use of some real-time PCR-targeting C. auris and sequencing of the ITS region is promising [9,10,11,12]. In 2017, a modified Sabouraud medium was suggested by Welsh et al. for a specific isolation of C. auris [5]. However, some Candida isolates were still misidentified [7,8]. Thus, our aim was to develop a specific medium only selective for all C. auris clades from clinical samples.

2. Materials and Methods

We collected 135 fungal strains (29 different species) [13,14,15] (Table 1) and cultured them on the modified Sabouraud broth suggested by Welsh et al. that contains 20 g/L Mannitol as a carbon source (in order to inhibit C. glabrata growth) [5] in both liquid and solid-phase media. For the liquid phase, turbidity of the broth was measured by spectrophotometry at 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation at 40 °C. This served to control the growth of each tested strain. For the solid phase, we added autoclaved bacterial agar (15 g/L) and adjusted for a pH = 7. Each colony was streaked directly on the solid agar or the liquid inoculum.
Table 1

Strains and samples tested on the SCA medium.

TypeStrain/SampleNbSourceOriginIdentificationqPCR C. auris (Ibrahim et al., 2021)
Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus cereus 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Corynebacterium amycolatum 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Corynebacterium jeikeium 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Corynebacterium propinquum 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Corynebacterium striatum 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Enterococcus faecalis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Enterococcus faecium 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Micrococcus luteus 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus aureus 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus capitis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus cohnii 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus epidermidis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus haemolyticus 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus lugdunensis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus pasteuri 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus saprophyticus 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus simulans 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus warneri 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Streptococcus agalactiae 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Streptococcus dysgalactiae 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Streptococcus equinus 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Streptococcus mitis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Streptococcus pneumoniae 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Staphylococcus hominis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Streptococcus salivarius 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Subtotal 25
Gram-negative bacteria Achromobacter xylosoxidans 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Acinetobacter baumannii 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Bacteroides fragilis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Citrobacter braakii 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Citrobacter freundii 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Citrobacter koseri 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Enterobacter aerogenes 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Enterobacter asburiae 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Enterobacter cloacae 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Enterobacter kobeii 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Escherichia coli 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Haemophilus influenzae 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Haemophilus parainfluenzae 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Hafnia alvei 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Klebsiella oxytoca 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Klebsiella pneumoniae 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Moraxella catarrhalis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Morganella morganii 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Pasteurella multocida 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Proteus mirabilis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Proteus vulgaris 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Providencia stuartii 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Raoultella ornithinolytica 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Stenotrophomonas maltophilis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Subtotal 25
Yeast Candida albicans 73ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida glabrata 8ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida krusei 4ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida parapsilosis 6ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida lusitaniae 3ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida tropicalis 6ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida zelanoides 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida lipolytica 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida inconspicua 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida intermedia 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida guilliermondii 3ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida bracarensis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida utilis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida bovina 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida dubliniensis 2ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida norvegensis 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida kefyr 2ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida beverwijkiae 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Cryptococcus diffluens 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Cryptococcus uniguttulatus 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Cryptococcus neoformans 2ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Yarrowia lipolitica 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida haemulonii 1ClinicalNetherlandsMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida duobushaemulonii 1ClinicalNetherlandsMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Trichosporon asahii 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Kodamaea ohmeri 1ClinicalMarseille, FranceMALDI-TOF-MSNot tested
Candida auris Clade I2ClinicalNetherlandsMALDI-TOF-MSPositive
Candida auris Clade II1ClinicalDSMZ collectionMALDI-TOF-MSPositive
Candida auris Clade III2ClinicalNetherlandsMALDI-TOF-MSPositive
Candida auris Clade IV2ClinicalNetherlandsMALDI-TOF-MSPositive
Subtotal 135
Human samples Stool samples 200ClinicalMarseille, France Negative
Total 385
We then cultured all C. auris (n = 7) and Candida tropicalis (n = 6) (see results) strains on the different culture media used in our diagnostic laboratories. The media used for culturing yeasts were: Sabouraud Dextrose Agar, CHROMagar Candida and Buffered Charcoal Yeast Extract. The media used for culturing bacteria were: Chocolate agar, Tryptic Soy agar, Columbia agar, Mannitol Salt agar, MacConkey agar (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) and LBJMR (Lucie Bardet and Jean-Marc Rolain) medium [16]. Finally, we cultured this set of 13 strains (i.e., C. tropicalis and C. auris) on different combinations of the Welsh et al. broth and MacConkey (MCK) agar, a selective medium for Gram-negative bacteria (see results and discussion) (Table 2) [17]. We prepared several media with varying concentrations of bile salts (1.5 g/L, 1 g/L, 0.75 g/L) and/or crystal violet (0.5 mg/L) (used as inhibitors in MCK) [17] to the initial broth composition of Welsh et al. in solid and liquid phase with shaking (300 rpm) at 40 °C (Table 2).
Table 2

Growth results of C. auris (seven strains from four clades) and C. tropicalis (n = 6) tested strains according to crystal violet and bile salts concentrations for each condition 5 g of pancreatic digest of casein. 5 g of peptic digest of animal tissue, 100 g NaCl, 20 g of Mannitol, 50 mg/L chloramphenicol and 50 mg/L gentamicin were added.

Crystal VioletBile SaltsC. auris Clade IC. auris Clade IIC. auris Clade IIIC. auris Clade VI C. tropicalis
0 mg/L0 g/L++++++++++
0 mg/L0.5 g/L++++++++++
0 mg/L1 g/L++++++++++
0 mg/L1.5 g/L++++++++
0.5 mg/L0 g/L++++++++-
0.5 mg/L0.5 g/L++++++++-
0.5 mg/L1 g/L+++++++-
0.5 mg/L1.5 g/L+++++++-
To study the specificity of our designated medium, we cultured for 3 days at 40 °C a panel of various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (n = 50), different C. auris clades (DSM 21092 and 6 strains that were kindly provided by Dr. Jacques F Meis, Canisius Wilhemina Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, the Netherlands) [9,18,19,20]. All C. auris strains were isolated from blood cultures except JCM 15,448 (Clade II), which is from the external ear canal. We tested also other Candida strains (including the closest Candida species to C. auris (C. haemulonii and C. duobushaemulonii) (directly streaked on the agar) [2,4]. In addition, we tested 200 fecal samples that were negative by real-time PCR for C. auris. These samples were collected at the Marseille Hospital (AP-HM, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux Marseille) from routine laboratory diagnostics (Table 1). Given that this work did not involve human body/tissues or use clinical data from patients, and according to French law (Loi no 2012–300 of 5 March 2012 and Décret no 2016–1537 of 16 November 2016 published in the ‘Journal Officiel de la République Française’), neither institutional ethical approval nor individual patient consent was required for this non-invasive study. All patients routinely sign an approval that the samples they submit for testing at AP-HM labs may be used in research. Each stool sample was enriched in Tryptic soy broth (TSB) for 3 days at 37 °C. Then, a total of 0.1 mL of each enriched media was streaked on the solid media. All bacterial and fungal strains used in this work were selected from previous studies and identified correctly by MALDI-TOF-MS [13,14,15,21]. Moreover, to determine the sensitivity of our C. auris-specific medium, a series of ten-fold dilution (10−1 to 10−10) of 0.5 McFarland of each C. auris clade was cultured. For the second clade, we tested the strain of DSMZ collection: DSM 21092. In addition, we also cultured a mixture of the same ten-fold dilutions of 0.5 McFarland of each C. auris strain with a stool sample negative in real-time PCR for C. auris (10−1 to 10−10). We did this as an attempt to determine whether the natural presence of microbes in stools would affect the growth of C. auris on our designated medium.

3. Results

We first cultured all our available Candida spp. strains (n = 135) on the broth developed by Welsh et al. Interestingly, we isolated 100% of the tested C. auris (n = 7) and C. tropicalis (n = 6) species on the Welsh broth [5]. However, when we cultured all strains on a combination of MacConkey agar and the Welsh broth, the growth of C. tropicalis strains was totally inhibited. On the other hand, we observed a normal growth of all C. auris species. The addition of crystal violet, with or without bile salts, did not affect the growth of C. auris (Figure 1), which we evaluated by measuring the turbidity of the broth using a spectrophotometer. However, we observed a total inhibition of all C. tropicalis strains in the presence of 0.5 mg/L crystal violet.
Figure 1

Striking Candida auris strains onto SCA medium, 2 strains/clade except for C. auris clade II (one strain).

The addition of bile salts only partially inhibited the growth of C. auris clade II. This was reflected as a decrease in the spectrophotometer value in comparison to the negative control only containing broth and crystal violet. As for C. tropicalis strains, the presence of bile salts without crystal violet did not inhibit their growth. It was then excluded from the final composition of the SCA medium (Table 2). Therefore, the growth of C. tropicalis was inhibited by adding crystal violet at 0.5 mg/L to the initial broth suggested by Welsh et al. with no effect on the growth of the 7 C. auris strains (2 strains/clade: except for clade II (one strain)) in solid and liquid phase. Moreover, the specificity of this medium was also confirmed after cultivating all bacterial spp. Candida spp. and fecal samples mentioned in Table 1 on the last composition of our medium (Table 3). No growth was noted after 3 days of incubation at 40 °C.
Table 3

Final composition of SCA (Specific Candida auris) medium.

Pancreatic Digest of Casein Peptic Digest of Animal TissueNaClMannitolCrystal VioletAgarpH Chloramphenicol Gentamicin
Welsh et al. broth5 g5 g100 g20 g--5.650 mg/L50 mg/L
SCA medium5 g5 g100 g20 g0.5 mg15 g750 mg/L50 mg/L
Concerning the sensitivity of our medium, after cultivation of several dilutions of a solution of 0.5 McFarland (10−1 to 10−10), the limit of detection (LOD) of C. auris Clade I, II and VI was 102 CFU/mL in both serial dilutions (with physiological water and a fecal sample). For the third clade (South Africa), we observed an excessive growth of both strains at an LOD of 101 CFU/mL. Thus, the presence of other microbes in a fecal sample does not inhibit or affect the growth of C. auris. All resulting colonies were isolated and subsequently identified by MALDI-TOF-MS and real-time PCR [9]. The final composition of our medium in 1 L of deionized water was 5 g of pancreatic digest of casein, 5 g of peptic digest of animal tissue, 20 g of mannitol, 0.5 mg of crystal violet (Sigma-aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), 100 g NaCl, 50 mg/L of chloramphenicol and 50 mg/L of gentamicin with pH = 7 (±0.2) at 40 °C (Figure 1, Table 3).

4. Discussion

Correct identification and rapid isolation of C. auris is essential for the timely and appropriate antifungal treatment and for infection prevention and control measures. This ensures limiting and controlling a possible nosocomial outbreak of a pathogen with fatal consequences and limited therapeutic options. This need is emphasized in the current COVID-19 pandemic we are living in, whereby an increasing amount of critically ill, immunocompromised patients populate the hospitals [22,23,24]. The gold standard of diagnosis remains molecular identification by sequencing and/or real-time PCR [9,10,11,12]. However, this is expensive and may only be available at specialized referral or research laboratories. Therefore, we have developed a cheap, simple, easily-prepared medium for isolating C. auris that is specific and sensitive. A caveat to the enrichment broth developed by Welsh et al. for C. auris isolation is that it also grows C. tropicalis strains, which we demonstrated in our work. We show that the addition of crystal violet (0.5 mg/L) to our specific C. auris medium inhibited the growth of C. tropicalis. SCA (specific C. auris) is considered as a new version of the above-mentioned broth [5]. In addition, other selective media are recently described for the isolation of C. auris [25,26,27]. Generally, the selected criteria to cultivate this yeast remain the same as those used in our work: the thermo-resistance, halo-tolerance and multi-resistance to many antifungal agents [2,4]. Here, we managed to develop a medium with the minimum possible inhibitors (40 °C incubation instead of 42, and 10% salinity instead of 12.5% compared to another study [26]). These moderate inhibitors still maintain the selectivity of SCA medium for all C. auris. Usually, C. auris, C. krusei and C. parapsilosis appear as pink colonies on the CHROMagar medium [2,4,28], and a newer version of CHROMagar has been developed to identify C. auris [25,27]. This phenotypic identification may be biased and reader-dependent, since it is based on interpretation of the color/morphology of growing colonies. Moreover, a longer duration of incubation may lead to a change in results as well. Thus, a high percentage of error may occur. Our SCA medium facilitates the interpretation of results by only selecting for C. auris. Interestingly, spiking a stool sample with a C. auris strain affected neither the specificity nor the sensitivity of this medium. However, increasing our sample size and testing a larger amount of clinical C. auris isolates and related yeasts (such as C. famata, C. pseudohaemulonii, C. metapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, C. rugosa, C. vulturna, Wickerhamomyces anomalus and C. sake) is necessary for further evaluation, validation and reproducibility of our C. auris-specific medium.

5. Conclusions

The use of our developed medium enables the rapid, specific isolation of C. auris strains and helps in the timely management of patients and resources to limit the occurrence of C. auris outbreaks. We propose an implementation of SCA medium in routine clinical mycology for screening skin, urine, vaginal and blood samples, especially in high-risk populations [13,15]. This SCA medium will further enhance our understanding of the phenotypic characteristics of C. auris and future isolates, most importantly allowing an accurate study of their antifungal resistance profiles.
  27 in total

1.  An outbreak due to Candida auris with prolonged colonisation and candidaemia in a tertiary care European hospital.

Authors:  Alba Ruiz-Gaitán; Ana M Moret; María Tasias-Pitarch; Ana I Aleixandre-López; Héctor Martínez-Morel; Eva Calabuig; Miguel Salavert-Lletí; Paula Ramírez; José L López-Hontangas; Ferry Hagen; Jacques F Meis; Juan Mollar-Maseres; Javier Pemán
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.377

2.  Candida auris candidaemia in Indian ICUs: analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy; Arunaloke Chakrabarti; Raees A Paul; Prashant Sood; Harsimran Kaur; Malini R Capoor; Anupma J Kindo; Rungmei S K Marak; Anita Arora; Raman Sardana; Shukla Das; Deepinder Chhina; Atul Patel; Immaculata Xess; Bansidhar Tarai; Pankaj Singh; Anup Ghosh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Lagier; Saber Khelaifia; Maryam Tidjani Alou; Sokhna Ndongo; Niokhor Dione; Perrine Hugon; Aurelia Caputo; Frédéric Cadoret; Sory Ibrahima Traore; El Hadji Seck; Gregory Dubourg; Guillaume Durand; Gaël Mourembou; Elodie Guilhot; Amadou Togo; Sara Bellali; Dipankar Bachar; Nadim Cassir; Fadi Bittar; Jérémy Delerce; Morgane Mailhe; Davide Ricaboni; Melhem Bilen; Nicole Prisca Makaya Dangui Nieko; Ndeye Mery Dia Badiane; Camille Valles; Donia Mouelhi; Khoudia Diop; Matthieu Million; Didier Musso; Jônatas Abrahão; Esam Ibraheem Azhar; Fehmida Bibi; Muhammad Yasir; Aldiouma Diallo; Cheikh Sokhna; Felix Djossou; Véronique Vitton; Catherine Robert; Jean Marc Rolain; Bernard La Scola; Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Anthony Levasseur; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 17.745

4.  Survival, Persistence, and Isolation of the Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Pathogenic Yeast Candida auris on a Plastic Health Care Surface.

Authors:  Rory M Welsh; Meghan L Bentz; Alicia Shams; Hollis Houston; Amanda Lyons; Laura J Rose; Anastasia P Litvintseva
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris Misidentified as Candida haemulonii: Characterization by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry and DNA Sequencing and Its Antifungal Susceptibility Profile Variability by Vitek 2, CLSI Broth Microdilution, and Etest Method.

Authors:  Shallu Kathuria; Pradeep K Singh; Cheshta Sharma; Anupam Prakash; Aradhana Masih; Anil Kumar; Jacques F Meis; Anuradha Chowdhary
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Performance of Two Novel Chromogenic Media for the Identification of Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris Compared with Other Commercially Available Formulations.

Authors:  Auke W de Jong; Chendo Dieleman; Mauricio Carbia; Ratna Mohd Tap; Ferry Hagen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Candida auris: A rapidly emerging cause of hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant fungal infections globally.

Authors:  Anuradha Chowdhary; Cheshta Sharma; Jacques F Meis
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  In vitro polymyxin activity against clinical multidrug-resistant fungi.

Authors:  Hanane Yousfi; Stéphane Ranque; Jean-Marc Rolain; Fadi Bittar
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.887

9.  First Candida auris Outbreak during a COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary-Care Center in Lebanon.

Authors:  Fatima Allaw; Nada Kara Zahreddine; Ahmad Ibrahim; Joseph Tannous; Hussein Taleb; Abdul Rahman Bizri; Ghassan Dbaibo; Souha S Kanj
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-02-03

10.  New clonal strain of Candida auris, Delhi, India.

Authors:  Anuradha Chowdhary; Cheshta Sharma; Shalini Duggal; Kshitij Agarwal; Anupam Prakash; Pradeep Kumar Singh; Sarika Jain; Shallu Kathuria; Harbans S Randhawa; Ferry Hagen; Jacques F Meis
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Tools for Detecting a "Superbug": Updates on Candida auris Testing.

Authors:  Shawn R Lockhart; Meghan M Lyman; D Joseph Sexton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 11.677

2.  ClaID: a Rapid Method of Clade-Level Identification of the Multidrug Resistant Human Fungal Pathogen Candida auris.

Authors:  Aswathy Narayanan; Pavitra Selvakumar; Rahul Siddharthan; Kaustuv Sanyal
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  Emergence of Candida auris in intensive care units in Algeria.

Authors:  Hanane Zerrouki; Ahmad Ibrahim; Sid-Ahmed Rebiahi; Yamina Elhabiri; Djamel-Eddine Benhaddouche; Theun de Groot; Jacques F Meis; Jean-Marc Rolain; Fadi Bittar
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.931

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.