Literature DB >> 34071746

Dynamic Indices Fail to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing One-Lung Ventilation for Thoracoscopic Surgery.

Kwan-Hoon Choi1, Jae-Kwang Shim2, Dong-Wook Kim1, Chun-Sung Byun3, Ji-Hyoung Park1.   

Abstract

Thoracic surgery using CO2 insufflation maintains closed-chest one-lung ventilation (OLV) that may provide the necessary heart-lung interaction for the dynamic indices to predict fluid responsiveness. We studied whether pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) can predict fluid responsiveness during thoracoscopic surgery. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. OLV was performed with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg at a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, while CO2 was insufflated to the contralateral side at 8 mm Hg. Patients whose stroke volume index (SVI) increased ≥15% after fluid challenge (7 mL/kg) were defined as fluid responders. The predictive ability of PPV and SVV on fluid responsiveness was investigated using the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUROC), which was also assessed according to the right or left lateral decubitus position considering the intrathoracic location of the right-sided superior vena cava. AUROCs of PPV and SVV for predicting fluid responsiveness were 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.47-0.83, p = 0.113) and 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.45-0.82, p = 0.147), respectively. The AUROCs of indices did not exhibit any statistical significance according to position. Dynamic indices of preload cannot predict fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation with CO2 gas insufflation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fluid responsiveness; pulse pressure variation; stroke volume variation; thoracoscopic surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 34071746     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  25 in total

1.  Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume.

Authors:  Jaume Mesquida; Hyung Kook Kim; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Respirophasic carotid artery peak velocity variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Y Song; Y L Kwak; J W Song; Y J Kim; J K Shim
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Federico Piccioni; Filippo Bernasconi; Giulia T A Tramontano; Martin Langer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Efficacy of CO2 insufflation during thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left lateral position.

Authors:  Itasu Ninomiya; Koichi Okamoto; Sachio Fushida; Katsunobu Oyama; Jun Kinoshita; Hiroyuki Takamura; Hidehiro Tajima; Isamu Makino; Tomoharu Miyashita; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-21

5.  Extravascular Lung Water and Tissue Perfusion Biomarkers After Lung Resection Surgery Under a Normovolemic Fluid Protocol.

Authors:  Sherif Assaad; Tassos Kyriakides; George Tellides; Anthony W Kim; Melissa Perkal; Albert Perrino
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Evaluation of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing protective one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mingda Duan; Feng Zhao; Weidong Mi
Journal:  Drug Discov Ther       Date:  2015-08

7.  Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Young Hee Shin; Justin Sangwook Ko; Mi Sook Gwak; Gaab Soo Kim; Jong Hwan Lee; Suk-Koo Lee
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation for lung surgery using thoracotomy: randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Jong-Hwan Lee; Yunseok Jeon; Jae-Hyon Bahk; Nam-Su Gil; Deok Man Hong; Jun Hyun Kim; Hyun Joo Kim
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Sarah Heenen; Michael Piagnerelli; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Stroke volume variation fail to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with one-lung ventilation using thoracotomy.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Feng Zhao; Weidong Mi; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Biosci Trends       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.