| Literature DB >> 34070891 |
Shunxin Zhou1, Chanjuan Zhang1, Yi Huang1, Haifeng Chen1, Songli Yuan1, Xinan Zhou1.
Abstract
Delaying the nodule senescence of legume crops can prolong the time of nitrogen fixation and attenuate the lack of fertilizer in the later stage of legume crop cultivation, resulting in improved crop yield and reduced usage of nitrogen fertilizer. However, effective measures to delay the nodule senescence of legume crops in agriculture are relatively lacking. In the present review, we summarized the structural and physiological characteristics of nodule senescence, as well as the corresponding detection methods, providing technical support for the identification of nodule senescence phenotype. We then outlined the key genes currently known to be involved in the regulation of nodule senescence, offering the molecular genetic information for breeding varieties with delayed nodule senescence. In addition, we reviewed various abiotic factors affecting nodule senescence, providing a theoretical basis for the interaction between molecular genetics and abiotic factors in the regulation of nodule senescence. Finally, we briefly prospected research foci of nodule senescence in the future.Entities:
Keywords: N-fixation activity; abiotic factors; cysteine proteases; legume-rhizobium symbiosis; nodule senescence
Year: 2021 PMID: 34070891 PMCID: PMC8227080 DOI: 10.3390/plants10061103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The morphology, physiological and biochemical changes of legume nodule senescence and the corresponding detection methods.
| Characteristics of Nodule Senescence | Corresponding Detection Methods | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| The color of nodules is converted to green; loss of turgidity in nodules | Calculating the ratio of senescent nodules to the total nodules | [ |
| Less electron dense; appearance of numerous vesicles and peroxisomes; | Nodule paraffin sections micromorphology analysis; electron microscope scanning | [ |
| The formation of complex elongated structures by mitochondria | ||
| Symbiotic membrane disintegration; damaged cell wall and lysis of bacteroids | Nodule paraffin sections micromorphology analysis; electron microscope scanning;TUNEL staining assay; in situ live/dead staining assay | [ |
| Decreased nitrogenase activity | Acetylene reduction assay (ARA) | [ |
| Decreased leghemoglobin content | The cyanmethemoglobin method, qPCR and Western blotting analysis | [ |
| Decreased lifestyle and growth capacity of Rhizobium | Testing the lifestyle and growth capacity of Rhizobium | [ |
| Increased the concentration of nitric oxide (NO), ethylene, ABA and so on | Measuring the nodule senescence-related metabolites and hormone signals | [ |
| Increased in the expression of nodule senescence-related marker genes | Laser microdissection; ACC immunolocalization; qPCR | [ |
Figure 1Prediction of the relationships among cysteine proteases, cystatins, NCR proteins, transcription factors and other genes in the regulation of nodule senescence. The dotted lines and/or question marks indicate that the relationship between the two proteins is uncertain. The double arrows indicate that the direct regulatory relationship between the two proteins is proved. The single arrows indicate that the relationship between the two proteins exists. The red ellipses indicate that the genes positively regulate nodule senescence. The green ellipses indicate that the genes negatively regulate nodule senescence. The ellipsis indicates that many genes have not yet been identified [10,21,23,25,31,40,41,42,44,46,47,48,49,50,51,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73].
Figure 2The interaction network of different abiotic factors in the regulation of the senescence of nodules [14,66,76,78,79,93,97,102,111,117,120,121,122].