| Literature DB >> 34070492 |
Ting-Yi Lin1, Yun-Chia Chang2, Yu-Jer Hsiao3, Yueh Chien4,5, Ying-Chun Jheng4,6,7, Jing-Rong Wu4, Lo-Jei Ching4, De-Kuang Hwang2,4,6,8, Chih-Chien Hsu2, Tai-Chi Lin2,4,6,8, Yu-Bai Chou2, Yi-Ming Huang2, Shih-Jen Chen2,6, Yi-Ping Yang4,6,9,10, Ping-Hsing Tsai4,5.
Abstract
Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are rare but highly heterogeneous genetic disorders that affect individuals and families worldwide. However, given its wide variability, its analysis of the driver genes for over 50% of the cases remains unexplored. The present study aims to identify novel driver genes, disease-causing variants, and retinitis pigmentosa (RP)-associated pathways. Using family-based whole-exome sequencing (WES) to identify putative RP-causing rare variants, we identified a total of five potentially pathogenic variants located in genes OR56A5, OR52L1, CTSD, PRF1, KBTBD13, and ATP2B4. Of the variants present in all affected individuals, genes OR56A5, OR52L1, CTSD, KBTBD13, and ATP2B4 present as missense mutations, while PRF1 and CTSD present as frameshift variants. Sanger sequencing confirmed the presence of the novel pathogenic variant PRF1 (c.124_128del) that has not been reported previously. More causal-effect or evidence-based studies will be required to elucidate the precise roles of these SNPs in the RP pathogenesis. Taken together, our findings may allow us to explore the risk variants based on the sequencing data and upgrade the existing variant annotation database in Taiwan. It may help detect specific eye diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa in East Asia.Entities:
Keywords: inherited retinal dystrophies; retinitis pigmentosa; whole-exome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34070492 PMCID: PMC8198027 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Representative results following ophthalmological features of the probands. (A) Pedigrees of RP. A total of 14 individual cases were recruited and are numbered in the pedigrees. Five were diagnosed as RP (p14, p15, p17, p18, and p19), shown as the filled box. The filled square (male) or circle (female) represents indicated RP patient, unfilled square (male) or circle (female) represents healthy individuals, and square (male) or circle (female) with slash represents deceased individuals. (B) Fundus photographs of the right (OD) and left (OS) eyes of the patient centered on the inferotemporal vascular arcade. At age 66, fundus photographs of this individual showed typical RP-associated characteristics, including attenuation of the retina blood vessels, bone spicule-like deposits, and waxy pallor of the optic disc. (C) OCT scans of the OD and OS eyes. (D) VF of both eyes. (E) ERG results of the normal and RP eyes. Compared to the normal case, electroretinograms of RP showed no detectable rod and cone responses.
Clinical feature of all 14 patients.
| Patient | Gender | Diagnosis | Age | Age of Onset | RP Fundus Feature | Visual Acuity | Macular Involvement | Visual Field | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p14 | Female | RP | 66 | 43 | Yes | 0.4 | 0.1 | Yes | Yes | - | - |
| p15 | Female | RP | 56 | 40 | Yes | 0.6 | 0.6 | Yes | Yes | - | - |
| p17 | Female | RP | 36 | 29 | Yes | 0.8 | 0.6 | Mild | Mild | - | - |
| p18 | Female | RP | 58 | 55 | Yes | 0.5 | 0.3 | Mild | Mild | + | + |
| P19 | Female | RP | 61 | 47 | Yes | 0.7 | 0.9 | Yes | Yes | - | - |
| P16 | Female | Healthy | 38 | ND | No | 1.0 | 1.0 | No | No | + | + |
| P726 | Male | Healthy | 21 | ND | No | 1.0 | 1.0 | No | No | ++ | ++ |
| P730 | Female | Healthy | 68 | ND | No | 0.8 | 0.7 | No | No | ++ | ++ |
| P732 | Female | Healthy | 32 | ND | No | 1.0 | 1.0 | No | No | +++ | +++ |
| P733 | Male | Healthy | 323 | ND | No | 1.0 | 1.0 | No | No | +++ | +++ |
| P734 | Male | Healthy | 36 | ND | No | 1.0 | 1.0 | No | No | +++ | +++ |
| P735 | Female | Healthy | 38 | ND | No | 1.0 | 1.0 | No | No | +++ | +++ |
| P737 | Male | Healthy | 61 | ND | No | 0.8 | 0.9 | No | No | ++ | ++ |
| P738 | Female | Healthy | 74 | ND | No | 0.8 | 0.8 | No | No | ++ | ++ |
OD: right eye, OS: left eye, RP: Retinitis Pigmentosa, -: VFI between 20-40%, +: VFI between 40-60%, ++: VFI between 60-80%, +++: VFI between 80-100% field, RP: Retinitis Pigmentosa, ND: non detected.
Figure 2The general characterization of variants in the RP family. (A) Summary of analysis pipeline used in this study, including the variant annotation, filtering, and determination for pathogenicity variants. (B) The chromosome distribution of all variants in the RP family. (C) The proportion of inheritance modes of the variants. (D) The molecular consequence of all variants. (E) The cellular location of affected protein by variants.
Database annotation of six candidate snps in Retinitis Pigmentosa family.
| Symbol | SnpDB | Chrom | Pos | Ref | Alt | Hgvsc | Consequence | Impact | Inheri-tance | Clin_ Sig | Polyphen | Lrt | Sift | Metasvm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR56A5 | Rs116908319 | Chr11 | 5968052 | G | A | NM_001146033.1:c.443C > T | missense variant | Mid | -- | -- | B | -- | T | -- |
| OR52L1 | Rs762369133 | Chr11 | 5986614 | T | C | NM 001005173.3:c.317A > G | missense variant | Mid | -- | -- | B | N | T | T |
| CTSD | Rs752612332 | Chr11 | 1759599 | T | TG | NM_001909.5:c.268dup | Frameshift variant | High | AR | P | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| PRF1 | Novel | Chr10 | 70600774 | CAGCCA | C | NM 005041.5:c.124_128del | Frameshift variant | High | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| KBTBD13 | Rs367648853 | Chr15 | 65077773 | G | A | NM 001101362.2:c.958G*A | Missense_variant | Mid | AD | -- | B | -- | D | T |
| ATP2B4 | Rs769793412 | Chr1 | 203707074 | A | G | NM_001001396.2:c.1165A > G | Missense_ variant | Mid | -- | -- | PD | N | T | T |
M: Moderate, AD: autosomal dominant, AR: autosomal recessive, Mu: multifactorial, P: Pathogenic; B: Benign, PD: Possibly damaging, Irt: Likelihood ratio test, sift: Sorting Intolerant.
Figure 3The biological characterization of RP-associated variants. The function of affected genes was mapped according to the QIAGEN Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, in the categories of the (A) Disease and (B) Physiological system development and function. (C) The regulation network of all altered genes in the RP family. The circle size presents the number of involved genes. The string shows the direct regulation. (D) Wiki pathway and KEGG pathway. This analysis shows the possible pathway of altered genes.
Figure 4The molecular characterization of RP-associated variants. (A) Heatmap of carried variants in the RP family. The cell in red indicates the patient having variants, whereas the cell in white indicates the patient without variants. We labeled the gene locus of variants in the right of the row. (B) Identification of a mutation in the PRF1 gene. Sanger sequencing of p14 (Mut) and p16 (WT) confirmed a novel variants of c.124_128del (p.Trp42GlyfsTer34). (C) The PPI network of affected protein in the RP family. The network shows all interacted proteins with indicated protein. Among the interacted protein, the node in red represents the major proteins contribute to retina and signaling-associated biological function. The string represents the direct interaction with indicated protein.
Related reference of candidate genes.
| Consequence | Gene | Snp | p14 | p15 | p17 | p18 | p19 | Retinitis Pigmentosa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missense variant | OR56A5 | Rs116908319 | o | o | o | o | o | none |
| Missense variant | OR52L1 | Rs762369133 | o | o | o | o | o | None |
| Frameshift variant | CTSD | Rs752612332 | o | o | o | o | o | 10.1002/mds.28106 |
| Frameshift variant | PRF1 | Novel | o | o | o | o | o | None |
| Missense variant | KBTBD13 | Rs367648853 | o | o | o | o | o | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.020 |
| Missense variant | ATP2B4 | Rs769793412 | o | o | o | o | o | 10.1080/13816810.2019.1703014 |
Primers for sanger sequencing.
| Gene | Forward (5′ to 3′) | Reverse (5′ to 3′) |
|---|---|---|
| ATP2B4 | CCACTGTCTGTTCCCTATGC | CAGGGACTTCTGCTCTTGTG |
| CTSD | CCCTGCTGAGAGCAAGGACC | GACAGAAGCCAGGGGTCTAGA |
| KBTBD13 | CTTCTGCTACGACCCCGAC | CCTCGATGGCGTAGAGCAG |
| OR52L1 | GCCTATGATGGTGGCTTGG | GGAGGCTATCCCAGCCTTC |
| OR56A5 | GGCCATATCTCCCTCACC C | GGAAGCCTCTCTGCACCAG |
| PRF1 | CTTCAGTGGAGCTGACTTTG | GGGAAGGGAGCAGTCATC |