PURPOSE: To survey families with clinical evidence of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) for mutations in genes known to cause adRP. METHODS: Two hundred adRP families, drawn from a cohort of more than 400 potential families, were selected by analysis of pedigrees. Minimum criteria for inclusion in the adRP cohort included either evidence of at least three generations of affected individuals or two generations with evidence of male-to-male transmission. Probands from each family were screened for mutations in 13 genes known to cause adRP: CA4, CRX, FSCN2, IMPDH1, NRL, PRPF3 (RP18), PRPF8 (RP13), PRPF31 (RP11), RDS, RHO, ROM1, RP1, and RP9. Families without mutations in autosomal genes and in which an X-linked mode of inheritance could not be excluded were tested for mutations in ORF 15 of X-linked RPGR. Potentially pathogenic variants were evaluated based on a variety of genetic and computational criteria, to confirm or exclude pathogenicity. RESULTS: A total of 82 distinct, rare (nonpolymorphic) variants were detected among the genes tested. Of these, 57 are clearly pathogenic based on multiple criteria, 10 are probably pathogenic, and 15 are probably benign. In the cohort of 200 families, 94 (47%) have one of the clearly pathogenic variants and 10 (5%) have one of the probably pathogenic variants. One family (0.5%) has digenic RDS-ROM1 mutations. Two families (1%) have a pathogenic RPGR mutation, indicating that families with apparent autosomal transmission of RP may actually have X-linked genetic disease. Thus, 107 families (53.5%) have mutations in known genes, leaving 93 whose underlying cause is still unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Together, the known adRP genes account for retinal disease in approximately half of the families in this survey, mostly Americans of European origin. Among the adRP genes, IMPDH1, PRPF8, PRPF31, RDS, RHO, and RP1 each accounts for more than 2% of the total; CRX, PRPF3, and RPGR each accounts for roughly 1%. Disease-causing mutations were not found in CA4, FSCN2, NRL, or RP9. Because some mutations are frequent and some regions are more likely to harbor mutations than others, more than two thirds of the detected mutations can be found by screening less than 10% of the total gene sequences. Among the remaining families, mutations may lie in regions of known genes that were not tested, mutations may not be detectable by PCR-based sequencing, or other loci may be involved.
PURPOSE: To survey families with clinical evidence of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) for mutations in genes known to cause adRP. METHODS: Two hundred adRP families, drawn from a cohort of more than 400 potential families, were selected by analysis of pedigrees. Minimum criteria for inclusion in the adRP cohort included either evidence of at least three generations of affected individuals or two generations with evidence of male-to-male transmission. Probands from each family were screened for mutations in 13 genes known to cause adRP: CA4, CRX, FSCN2, IMPDH1, NRL, PRPF3 (RP18), PRPF8 (RP13), PRPF31 (RP11), RDS, RHO, ROM1, RP1, and RP9. Families without mutations in autosomal genes and in which an X-linked mode of inheritance could not be excluded were tested for mutations in ORF 15 of X-linked RPGR. Potentially pathogenic variants were evaluated based on a variety of genetic and computational criteria, to confirm or exclude pathogenicity. RESULTS: A total of 82 distinct, rare (nonpolymorphic) variants were detected among the genes tested. Of these, 57 are clearly pathogenic based on multiple criteria, 10 are probably pathogenic, and 15 are probably benign. In the cohort of 200 families, 94 (47%) have one of the clearly pathogenic variants and 10 (5%) have one of the probably pathogenic variants. One family (0.5%) has digenic RDS-ROM1 mutations. Two families (1%) have a pathogenic RPGR mutation, indicating that families with apparent autosomal transmission of RP may actually have X-linked genetic disease. Thus, 107 families (53.5%) have mutations in known genes, leaving 93 whose underlying cause is still unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Together, the known adRP genes account for retinal disease in approximately half of the families in this survey, mostly Americans of European origin. Among the adRP genes, IMPDH1, PRPF8, PRPF31, RDS, RHO, and RP1 each accounts for more than 2% of the total; CRX, PRPF3, and RPGR each accounts for roughly 1%. Disease-causing mutations were not found in CA4, FSCN2, NRL, or RP9. Because some mutations are frequent and some regions are more likely to harbor mutations than others, more than two thirds of the detected mutations can be found by screening less than 10% of the total gene sequences. Among the remaining families, mutations may lie in regions of known genes that were not tested, mutations may not be detectable by PCR-based sequencing, or other loci may be involved.
Authors: María Martínez-Gimeno; María José Gamundi; Imma Hernan; Miquel Maseras; Elena Millá; Carmen Ayuso; Blanca García-Sandoval; Magdalena Beneyto; Concha Vilela; Montserrat Baiget; Guillermo Antiñolo; Miguel Carballo Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: T Jeffrey Keen; Matthew M Hims; Arthur B McKie; Anthony T Moore; Rob M Doran; David A Mackey; David C Mansfield; Robert F Mueller; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Alan C Bird; Alexander F Markham; Chris F Inglehearn Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: J-M Rozet; I Perrault; N Gigarel; E Souied; I Ghazi; S Gerber; J-L Dufier; A Munnich; J Kaplan Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Christina F Chakarova; Matthew M Hims; Hanno Bolz; Leen Abu-Safieh; Reshma J Patel; Myrto G Papaioannou; Chris F Inglehearn; T Jeffrey Keen; Catherine Willis; Anthony T Moore; Thomas Rosenberg; Andrew R Webster; Alan C Bird; Andreas Gal; David Hunt; Eranga N Vithana; Shomi S Bhattacharya Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Avril Kennan; Aileen Aherne; Arpad Palfi; Marian Humphries; Alex McKee; Alan Stitt; David A C Simpson; Karin Demtroder; Torben Orntoft; Carmen Ayuso; Paul F Kenna; G Jane Farrar; Pete Humphries Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Sara J Bowne; Lori S Sullivan; Susan H Blanton; Constance L Cepko; Seth Blackshaw; David G Birch; Dianna Hughbanks-Wheaton; John R Heckenlively; Stephen P Daiger Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Catherine J Spellicy; Dong Xu; Garrett Cobb; Lizbeth Hedstrom; Sara J Bowne; Lori S Sullivan; Stephen P Daiger Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Daniel Strayve; Mustafa S Makia; Mashal Kakakhel; Haarthi Sakthivel; Shannon M Conley; Muayyad R Al-Ubaidi; Muna I Naash Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Stephen P Daiger; Lori S Sullivan; Anisa I Gire; David G Birch; John R Heckenlively; Sara J Bowne Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Jungyeon Won; Jeremy R Charette; Vivek M Philip; Timothy M Stearns; Weidong Zhang; Jürgen K Naggert; Mark P Krebs; Patsy M Nishina Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Stephen P Daiger; Sara J Bowne; Lori S Sullivan; Kari Branham; Dianna K Wheaton; Kaylie D Jones; Cheryl E Avery; Elizabeth D Cadena; John R Heckenlively; David G Birch Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2018 Impact factor: 2.622