| Literature DB >> 34070326 |
Carolina Ramos Hurtado1,2,3, Gabriela Ramos Hurtado4,5, Gabrielle Lupeti de Cena3, Rafaela Campos Queiroz1,2, Alexandre Vieira Silva6, Milton Faria Diniz7, Verônica Ribeiro Dos Santos8, Vladimir Trava-Airoldi9, Maurício da Silva Baptista10, Ncediwe Tsolekile11,12, Oluwatobi Samuel Oluwafemi11,12, Katia Conceição3, Dayane Batista Tada2.
Abstract
Conjugation of photosensitizers (PS) with nanoparticles has been largely used as a strategy to stabilize PS in the biological medium resulting in photosensitizing nanoparticles of enhanced photoactivity. Herein, (Meso-5, 10, 15, 20-tetrakis (3-hydroxyphenyl) phorphyryn (mTHPP) was conjugated with diamond nanoparticles (ND) by covalent bond. Nanoconjugate ND-mTHPP showed suitable stability in aqueous suspension with 58 nm of hydrodynamic diameter and Zeta potential of -23 mV. The antibacterial activity of ND-mTHPP was evaluated against Escherichia coli for different incubation times (0-24 h). The optimal activity was observed after 2 h of incubation and irradiation (660 nm; 51 J/cm2) performed right after the addition of ND-mTHPP (100 μg/mL) to the bacterial suspension. The inhibitory activity was 56% whereas ampicillin at the same conditions provided only 14% of bacterial growth inhibition. SEM images showed agglomerate of ND-mTHPP adsorbed on the bacterial cell wall, suggesting that the antimicrobial activity of ND-mTHPP was afforded by inducing membrane damage. Cytotoxicity against murine embryonic fibroblast cells (MEF) was also evaluated and ND-mTHPP was shown to be noncytotoxic since viability of cells cultured for 24 h in the presence of the nanoconjugate (100 μg/mL) was 78%. Considering the enhanced antibacterial activity and the absence of cytotoxic effect, it is possible to consider the ND-mTHPP nanoconjugate as promising platform for application in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT).Entities:
Keywords: drug-resistance; nanoconjugate; photodynamic antimicrobial therapy (aPDT); photosensitizers (PS)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34070326 PMCID: PMC8227420 DOI: 10.3390/nano11061393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic representation (out of scale) of the conjugation of mTHPP with ND-COOH through esterification resulting in ND-mTHPP nanoconjugate system.
Figure 2FT-IR spectroscopy ND-COOH and conjugated system (ND-mTHPP).
Figure 3DLS size distribution of ND-COOH and ND-mTHPP in aqueous suspension (100 μg/mL).
Hydrodynamic diameter of ND-mTHPP in aqueous suspension, DMEM and MHB at 100 μg/mL. * Value statistically different from the others (p < 0.05).
| Solvent | D (nm) |
|---|---|
| Water | 58 ± 1 |
| Mueller Hinton Medium | 58 ± 2 |
| DMEM Medium | 82 ± 3 * |
Figure 4Percentage of inhibition of Escherichia coli growth calculated by considering OD600 of E. coli grown in the absence of sample and irradiation as 100% of growth. E. coli was incubated with ND-COOH (100 μg/mL), ND-mTHPP (100 μg/mL) and ampicilin (100 μg/mL), in Mueller Hinton Broth Medium (MHB) for 24 h, with and without irradiation (660 nm; 51 J/cm2). Experiments were repeated in triplicate and all the values were statistically different (p < 0.001) in comparison with control group of E. coli growth (without sample and in the absence of irradiation).
Figure 5Inhibition of Escherichia coli growth. (a) Percentage of growth was calculated for E. coli incubated with ND-mTHPP (100 μg/mL) and E. coli incubated with Ampicillin (100 μg/mL), in Mueller Hinton Broth Medium (MHB), with and without irradiation at different time after the irradiation. (b) Percentage of growth was calculated for E. coli incubated with ND-mTHPP (100 μg/mL) and E. coli incubated with Ampicilin (100 μg/mL), in Mueller Hinton Broth Medium (MHB), with irradiation. Experiments were performed in triplicate and significant differences between E. coli control and test samples are marked with * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), and *** (p < 0.001).
Inhibition of Escherichia coli growth by ND-mTHPP, with and without irradiation, calculated from 0 to 24 h.
| Inhibition | ||
|---|---|---|
| Incubation Time (h) | Without | With |
| 0 | 24 ± 14 | 24 ± 7 |
| 0.5 | 33 ± 7 | 29 ± 3 |
| 1 | 36 ± 6 | 43 ± 3 |
| 1.5 | 42 ± 7 | 50 ± 3 |
|
|
|
|
| 2.5 | 39 ± 8 | 46 ±4 |
| 3 | 40 ± 8 | 47 ± 3 |
| 5 | 32 ±8 | 50 ± 3 |
| 7 | 33 ± 6 | 37 ± 4 |
| 24 | 27 ± 6 | 31 ± 5 |
Figure 6Images of SEM of Escherichia coli grown in the presence of ND-mTHPP in the absence of irradiation (a,b) and after irradiation (660 nm; 51 J/cm2) (c,d).
Figure 7Cytotoxicity ND-COOH (100 μg/mL) and ND-mTHPP (100 μg/mL) in MEF culture after 24 h, with and without irradiation. Cell viability of ND-COOH and ND-mTHPP measured using MTT assay. Experiments were repeated in triplicate and significant differences between MEF control (without irradiation) and test samples are marked with * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), and *** (p < 0.001).