Literature DB >> 34070285

Incidence and Characteristics of Kidney Stones in Patients on Ketogenic Diet: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Prakrati Acharya1, Chirag Acharya2, Charat Thongprayoon3, Panupong Hansrivijit4, Swetha R Kanduri5, Karthik Kovvuru5, Juan Medaura6, Pradeep Vaitla6, Desiree F Garcia Anton6, Poemlarp Mekraksakit7, Pattharawin Pattharanitima8, Tarun Bathini9, Wisit Cheungpasitporn3.   

Abstract

Very-low-carbohydrate diets or ketogenic diets are frequently used for weight loss in adults and as a therapy for epilepsy in children. The incidence and characteristics of kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets are not well studied.
Methods: A systematic literature search was performed, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the databases' inception through April 2020. Observational studies or clinical trials that provide data on the incidence and/or types of kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets were included. We applied a random-effects model to estimate the incidence of kidney stones.
Results: A total of 36 studies with 2795 patients on ketogenic diets were enrolled. The estimated pooled incidence of kidney stones was 5.9% (95% CI, 4.6-7.6%, I2 = 47%) in patients on ketogenic diets at a mean follow-up time of 3.7 +/- 2.9 years. Subgroup analyses demonstrated the estimated pooled incidence of kidney stones of 5.8% (95% CI, 4.4-7.5%, I2 = 49%) in children and 7.9% (95% CI, 2.8-20.1%, I2 = 29%) in adults, respectively. Within reported studies, 48.7% (95% CI, 33.2-64.6%) of kidney stones were uric stones, 36.5% (95% CI, 10.6-73.6%) were calcium-based (CaOx/CaP) stones, and 27.8% (95% CI, 12.1-51.9%) were mixed uric acid and calcium-based stones, respectively. Conclusions: The estimated incidence of kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets is 5.9%. Its incidence is approximately 5.8% in children and 7.9% in adults. Uric acid stones are the most prevalent kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets followed by calcium-based stones. These findings may impact the prevention and clinical management of kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; ketogenic diet; kidney stones; meta-analysis; nephrolithiasis; systematic review

Year:  2021        PMID: 34070285      PMCID: PMC8161846          DOI: 10.3390/diseases9020039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diseases        ISSN: 2079-9721


1. Introduction

The ketogenic diet, initially introduced in the early nineteenth century, refers to a diet pattern that is low in carbohydrates and high in fat with a moderate proportion of protein (1.2–1.5 g/kg) [1,2]. The ketogenic diet increases the oxidation of fatty acids and ketone bodies production—creating a state of ketosis and mild acidosis [3,4]. A ketogenic diet leads to glycolysis inhibition, inhibits glutamatergic synaptic transmission, and assists in weight loss [5,6], making it popular not only for patients with obesity or metabolic syndrome, but even for athletes, both professional and amateur [7]. Ketone bodies (acetate, aceto-acetate, and beta-hydroxybutyrate) have been shown to prevent recurrent seizures [8,9,10], hence are prescribed for children with intractable seizures. However, the mechanism of the anti-seizure effects of ketone bodies is not well understood. The ketogenic diet may also have a protective effect against cognitive impairment [11] and malignancy [12]. Indications for the ketogenic diet have been extended to include glucose-1 transporter deficiency syndrome and pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency disorders [13,14]. Multiple formulations of the ketogenic diet are currently available, including the classic keto diet, low glycemic index diet (LGID), medium-chain triglyceride diet (MCT), and modified Atkins diet. These diets differ in the proportions of lipid, carbohydrate, and protein contents [10,13,14,15]. Despite potential advantages, the ketogenic diet has multiple adverse effects. During the first four-week period, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea are particularly common with the medium-chain triglyceride diet [16,17,18], posing a risk for acute kidney injury, hyponatremia, hypomagnesemia, hypercalciuria, hyperuricemia, and metabolic acidosis [19,20,21]. Long-term adverse effects of the ketogenic diet, including osteopenia, risk of bone fractures, alterations in vitamin D levels, are well reported [22,23,24]. Increased risk for kidney stones is well described in patients using the ketogenic diet for over a 2 year period [17,20,25,26], with complications such as obstructive uropathy, acute kidney injury, and chronic kidney disease [27,28,29]. The incidence of kidney stones among patients on the ketogenic diet ranges from 3% to 10% [20,30,31], compared to one in several thousand in the general population [17,24]. We performed a meta-analysis on the incidence and characteristics of kidney stones in patients on the ketogenic diet to better understand the kidney stones’ burden and pathophysiology in this population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategies

A comprehensive search of several databases from each database’s inception to 3 May 2019 was conducted. The databases included OVID MEDLINE (1946 to April 2020), EMBASE (1988 to April 2020), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (database inception to April 2020). The systematic literature review was conducted independently by two investigators (P.A. and C.A.), using the search strategy that consolidated the terms of (‘ketogenic diet’ OR ‘keto diet’ OR ‘atkins diet’ OR ‘low carb diet’ OR ‘low carbohydrate diet’) AND (nephrolithiasis OR ‘kidney stone’ OR ‘kidney stones’). The actual strategy listing all search terms used is available in the online Supplementary Materials. There were no restrictions on language, sample size, or study duration. This study was conducted by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement (online Supplementary Materials) [32].

2.2. Study Selection

Eligible studies must be clinical trials, observational studies (cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies) that reported incidence and characteristics of kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets. Retrieved articles were individually reviewed for eligibility by the two investigators (P.A. and C.A.). Discrepancies were addressed and resolved by third investigator (W.C.). Inclusion was not limited by language, age, sample size, or study duration.

2.3. Data Extraction

The following data were extracted: first author name, year of publication, number of patients, duration of follow-up, description of ketogenic diet, mean age, sex, incidence of kidney stones, type of kidney stones, and time to diagnosis of kidney stones after ketogenic diet consumption. The primary outcome included the incidence of kidney stones.

2.4. Data Synthesis and Statistical Analysis

We calculated the pooled estimated incidence of kidney stones among patients on the ketogenic diet. The pre-specified subgroup analysis based on age groups (pediatrics and adults) was performed. A random-effects model was used due to the expected clinical heterogeneity in the included populations [33]. All pooled estimates were shown with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among effect sizes estimated by individual studies was described with the I2 statistic and the chi-square test. A value of I2 of 0% to 25% represents insignificant heterogeneity, 26% to 50% low heterogeneity, 51% to 75% moderate heterogeneity and 76% to 100%, high heterogeneity [34]. Publication bias was evaluated using the Egger test [35]. A p-value of less than 0.05 indicates the presence of publication bias. The meta-analysis was performed by the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.3 software (Biostat Inc, Englewood, NJ, USA). The data for this meta-analysis are publicly available through the Open Science Framework on 25 September 2020 (URL: https://osf.io/2gtk3/ (accessed on 25 September 2020)).

3. Results

A total of 221 potentially relevant articles were identified and screened. Fifty-one articles were assessed in detail of which 36 studies with 2795 patients on ketogenic diets were enrolled in our meta-analysis (Figure 1 and Table 1). The definitions and reported adverse effects observed in ketogenic diets in different studies are shown in Table 2.
Figure 1

The literature retrieval, review, and selection process.

Table 1

Characteristics of studies included in this systematic review.

ReferenceDescription of Ketogenic DietTotal Number of Patients on Ketogenic DietMean Age of Included PatientsMean Duration of KGDNo. of Patients with Kidney Stones% of Patients with Kidney Stones24 h Urine Study
Holler A. et al. [36]Classical KD (16), Modified Atkins diet (MAD) (14)31Median 5.5, mean 5.5 (0.1–15.7 Y)N/A00Hypercalciuria in 12/22
Rener et al. [37]2.5:1 to 45/3/2020115<3 YAverage 13 M (4–16 M)16.60%N/A
Attar H. et al. [38]Modified Atkins diet1323–72 YRange 1–21 M17.69%N/A
Felix et al. [39]Modified Atkins diet56–12 Y4 M001 had hypercalciuria
Lapp et al. [40]KGD in 7 and Modified Atkins diet in 1926>18 YN/A415%N/A
Nerurkar et al. [41]KGD17<3 YN/A15.88%N/A
Nangia et al. [42]KGD594.5 Y (range 0.2–22 Y)Mean 2 Y (range 0–5.5 Y)35%N/A
Gainza et al. [43]KGD414.7 Y (range 1–13 Y)Mean 5.79 Y (3–10.6)37.10%Hypercalciuria in 11 (26.2%)
Mak et al. [44]KGD (MCT oil diet)137.3 YN/A17.70%Increase Ca/Cr ratio in 1 patient
Furth et al. [45]N/A1125 YN/A65.30%Elevated Ca/Cr ratio
Rios et al. [46]4:1 (1.5:1–4.5:1) KGD22Range 1–19 Y (min age 18 M)25 M (1–54 M)29.09%N/A
Sharma et al. [47]3:1 KGD in <18 M, 4:1 KGD in >18 M23(range 6 M–5 Y)N/A13.70%Elevated Ca/Cr ratio
Kang et al. [48]3:1 KGD40Median ± IQR- 15 ± 13.0 (range 6–60 M)N/A25.00%N/A
Wibisono et al. [49]Classic KGD, MCT diet, Modified Atkins diet483.8 Y (range 2.3–7 Y)Range 1–14 Y24.00%N/A
Simm et al. [50]4:1 to 2:1 KGD296.4 Y (range 3.3–17.8 Y)Mean 2.1 Y (range 0.5–6.5 Y)1N/AN/A
Guzel et al. [51]Olive oil-based KGD389Median 4.0 (2–7)Y12 M123%N/A
Hassan et al. [52]Classic 4:1 KGD (49 of 52 pts), rest with modified diet supplemented by MCT oil525 Y, 6 M ± 3 Y, 4 MN/A11.90%Increased calcium oxide in urine
Takeoka et al. [53]3:1 to 4.1 KGD + Topiramate14Mean age 4.7 YN/A00%N/A
Kossoff et al. [54]KGD (older children on 4:1 diet and younger on 3:1) without carbonic anhydrase inhibitors2215.1 Y (SD 4.5, range 16.5 Y)N/A156.70%N/A
Kossoff et al. [55]KGD (older children on 4:1 diet and younger on 3:1) with topiramate or zonisamide804.8 Y (SD 2.4, range 6.5 Y)N/A56.30%N/A
Kossoff et al. [56]4:1 KGD in 9, 3.5:1 in 1 and 3:1 in 13231.1 Y (range 0.5–24 M)N/A28.60%N/A
Kang et al. [57]4:1 KGD12964.9 (±59.3) M12.0 (±10.1) M43.10%N/A
Mackay et al. [58]N/A26Median age 6.1 Y (range 2.3–13.2)N/A00%Increased urine calcium in 8%
Groesbeck et al. [59]4:1 KGD in 19, 3:1 KGD in 9283 Y 9 M (range 6 M–13 Y 6 M)7 Y 9 M725%Increase Ca Cr ratio in 14 pts
Sampath et al. [60]3:1 (56%) or 4:1 KGD195Median 3 Y (0.5–15 Y)Median 12 M (range 1–72 M)137%N/A
Raimann et al. [61]4:1 in 16, 3.5:1 in 3 and 3:1 in 2 + Calcium and MV supplement216.2 Y (range 6 M–17 Y)15 pt completed 1 Y of KGD 2.6 Y (1–6.3 Y)210%Hypercalciuria in both stone formers
Caraballo et al. [62]N/A1405 Y (range 1–18 Y3.5 Y (range 1–20 Y)64.28%N/A
Dressler et al. [63]4:1 in 36, 3:1 in 53, 3.5:1 in 6, 2.5:1 in 17, 2:1 in 31152.86 ± 3.1 (min 0.0–max 16.8)N/A43.40%N/A
Hallbook et al. [64]N/A2905.3 (0.6–18.6)2 Y7N/AN/A
Khoo et al. [65]4:1 in 12, 3:1 in 11, 2:1 in 3, MAD in 4306.8 Y (8 M to 17 Y)8 M (range 7 days to 6 Y)413%N/A
Lim et al. [66]N/A2044.8 Y (range 0.3–33.9 Y)Median 17 M (95% CI 9–24 M)20.98%N/A
McNally et al. [67]3:1 or 4;1 KGD195 (KGD + hypercalciuria so polycitra K given)4.3 Y in reactive group15.6 (13.1)136.70%N/A
Park et al. [68]N/A16Age range (0.1–40 Y)N/A16.25%N/A
Draaisma et al. [69]Classic KGD (67.6%), MCT diet (2.9%), MAD (19.1%) or LGIT (7.4%), other (1.5%)685.7 ± 4.3 Y25.6 ± 24.8 M68.80%N/A
Roehhl et al. [70]Modified KGD55Mean 38 Y (range 17–70 Y)N/A00%N/A
Lambrechts et al. [71]MCT diet and Classic KGD267 Y00N/AN/A

Abbreviations: KGD—ketogenic diet, MCT—medium chain triglyceride, F/H—family history, Y—years, M—months, pts—patients, Ca—calcium, Cr—creatinine, MV—multivitamin, K citrate—potassium citrate, RR—relative risk, NR—not recorded, gp—group, LGIT—low glycemic index treatment, MAD—modified Atkin’s diet.

Table 2

Definitions and reported adverse effects observed in ketogenic diets in different studies.

AuthorDifferent Types of Ketogenic DietSide Effects/Complication of Ketogenic Diet besides Renal Stones
Holler A. et al. [36]Classical KGD and MADConstipation, increased bromine level (3.2%)
Rener et al. [37]KGD 2.5:1 to 4:1Vomiting
Attar H. et al. [38]MADNR
Felix et al. [39]MADWeight loss, hyperlipidemia
Lapp et al. [40]KGD, MADGallstones (3.8%), hyperlipidemia (3.8%)
Nerurkar et al. [41]KGD not specifiedConstipation (57%)
Nangia et al. [42]KGD 3:1 to 4:1Constipation (39%), acidosis (21%), nausea/emesis (14%), increased seizures (7%).
Gainza et al. [43]KGD not specifiedOsteopenia (38.1%), severe metabolic acidosis (9.5%), recurrent pneumonia (21.4%), neutropenia (0.5%), fatty liver (0.1%), easy bruising (4.8%)
Mak et al. [44]KGD—Protein + carb (<19%) of caloric requirementsMCT 60–70% of caloric requirementsWeight loss (46%), diarrhea (38%), bad temper (7.6%), abdominal cramps (15%), nausea (15%), bad body smell (7.6%)
Furth et al. [45] NR
Rios et al. [46]KGD 4:1 (1.5:1 to 4.5:1)Nausea and vomiting (26.3%), hypercholesterolemia (64.7%), anorexia (31.8%), constipation (40.9%), symptomatic acidosis (9.09%), carnitine deficiency (9.09%)
Sharma et al. [47]Classical KGD 3:1 or 4:1Vomiting (75%), asymptomatic hypocalcemia, Constipation (75%), weight loss, hypoalbuminemia
Kang et al. [48]Classical KGD 4:1Dehydration, GI discomfort, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, symptomatic hypoglycemia, lipoid aspiration pneumonia, hypoproteinemia, hypomagnesemia, repeated hyponatremia
Wibisono et al. [49]Classical KGD, MCT, MADConstipation, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, diarrhea, lethargy, iron deficiency, GERD, vomiting, hypoglycemia
Simm et al. [50]KGD 2:1 to 4:1Osteopenia, fracture
Guzel et al. [51]KGD 2.5:1 and 4:1Hyperlipidemia (50.8%), selenium deficiency (26.9%), constipation (26.2%), sleep disturbances (20%), hyperuricemia (3%), hepatic effects (2.6%), hypoproteinemia (2.6%), hypoglycemia(1.5%)
Hassan et al. [52]Classic 4:1 KGD or MCT dietConstipation (85%), gall bladder stone (1.9%), hyponatremia (1.9%)
Takeoka et al. [53]KGD not specifiedNausea/vomiting (7%), irritability (7%), lethargy (21%), sedation (14%)
Kossoff et al. [54]KGD 3:1 to 4:1NR
Kossoff et al. [55]KGD 3:1 to 4:1Sedation (27%), rash, irritability
Kossoff et al. [56]KGD 3:1 to 4:1Severe GERD (13%), hip dislocation (0.4%)
Kang et al. [57] Dehydration, GI discomfort, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, hypoglycemia
Mackay et al. [58]Classical KGD 3:1 to 4.2:1Asymptomatic hypoglycemia (24%), poor linear growth (20%), hyperlipidemia (16%), vomiting (12%), hypocarnitinemia (8%), hypercalciuria (8%), constipation (8%), osteopenia (4%), pancreatitis (4%), Diarrhea (4%)
Groesbeck et al. [59]60.7% on classical KDT7% MAD, 32% other KGDFractures (21.4%), hyperlipidemia (7%), constipation (53%)
Sampath et al. [60]KGD 3:1 (56%) or 4:1NR
Raimann et al. [61]KGD 4:1 (3 pts 3.5:1 2 pts 3:1)Hypercholesterolemia 64% (at 12 months) 15% (at 18 months), growth retardation
Caraballo et al. [62]KGDGI side effects (30.5%), hyperlipidemia (9.7%), weight gain (2.3%), hypocarnitinemia (3.7%), hypercalciuria (6.9%), hypoglycemia (5.5%), dehydration (6.4%)
Dressler et al. [63]KGD 3:1, 4:1 or 2.5:1Carnitine deficiency (13%), growth deficit (5.2%), weight gain (1.7%), hypertriglyceridemia (29.5%), hypercholesterolemia (10.4%)
Hallbook et al. [64]KGD 3:1 or 4:1 ratioHyperlipidemia (6%), bone fractures (0.9%)
Khoo et al. [65]Classical KGD (81.2%), MAD (18.75%)Constipation (43%), hunger (23%), excessive weight gain or loss (20%), vomiting (10%), hyperuricemia (30%), hypocalcemia (20%)
Lim et al. [66]NRGI side effects (nausea, vomiting, and constipation), Inadequate weight gain or significant weight loss, ketoacidosis, hepatotoxicity, renal dysfunction, sinus tachycardia, osteoporosis
McNally et al. [67]KGD unspecifiedNR
Park et al. [68]KGD 4:1 (87.5%), KGD 3:1 (12.5%)Regurgitation, constipation, aspiration, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoproteinemia, nausea, vomiting
Draaisma et al. [69]Classic KGD (67.6%), MCT diet (2.9%)MAD (19.1%), LGID (7.4%), others (1.5%)Decrease in BMD 0.22 Z-score/year
Roehhl et al. [70]Modified ketogenic diet15 gm carb vs. 50 gm carb dietConstipation (9%)
Lambrechts et al. [71]KGDGI side effects (30%)

Abbreviations: KGD—ketogenic diet; MAD—modified Atkins diet; MCT—medium chain triglyceride diet; NR—non-report; LGID—low glycemic index diet.

3.1. Incidence of Kidney Stones among Patients on Ketogenic Diets

The estimated pooled incidence of kidney stones was 5.9% (95% CI, 4.6–7.6%, I2 = 47%, Figure 2) in patients on ketogenic diets at a mean follow-up time of 3.7 +/− 2.9 years. Subgroup analyses demonstrated the estimated pooled incidence of kidney stones of 5.8% (95% CI, 4.4–7.5%, I2 = 49%) in children and 7.9% (95% CI, 2.8–20.1%, I2 = 29%) in adults (Figure 3), respectively.
Figure 2

Pooled estimated incidence of kidney stones.

Figure 3

Pooled estimated incidence of kidney stones by patient population.

3.2. Type of Kidney Stones among Patients on Ketogenic Diet

Within reported studies, 48.7% (95% CI, 33.2–64.6%) of kidney stones were uric stones, 36.5% (95% CI, 10.6–73.6%) were calcium-based (CaOx/CaP) stones, and 27.8% (95% CI, 12.1–51.9%) were mixed uric acid and calcium-based stones, respectively.

3.3. Evaluation for Publication Bias

Using Egger’s regression asymmetry tests, there was no significant publication bias found in this meta-analysis. The Egger’s regression test demonstrated no significant publication bias in all analyses (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

Our analysis reports a pooled incidence of kidney stones at 5.6% in patients treated with a ketogenic diet after four years. The incidence of nephrolithiasis in the general population is reported at 0.3% per year in men and 0.25% per year in women [72]. In our study, the incidence of kidney stones is identical in children and adults. This finding contradicts the hypothesis that children are more susceptible to kidney stone formation due to extended treatment duration with the ketogenic diet, small renal tubular lumen, and relatively less renal reserve. However, studies included in this analysis did not report the recurrence of kidney stones; it is possible children may be predisposed to recurrent kidney stones due to prolonged exposure to the ketogenic diet. More studies are required to understand the risk of recurrent kidney stones with the ketogenic diet. Uric acid stones are the most common stones in patients receiving the ketogenic diet, followed by calcium-based stones and uric acid–calcium mixed stones. In contrast, calcium oxalate stones are the most common stones in the general population [72]. The exact mechanism of nephrolithiasis following the ketogenic diet is unclear. However, it is likely related to hypocitraturia and acidosis, common in people consuming a high-protein and low-alkali diet [20]. Acidosis contributes to significant reabsorption of citrate in the proximal tubule, further contributing to hypocitraturia [25,73,74,75,76,77,78]. A more generous amount of free calcium is available for stone formation in a low-citrate environment [73,79]. Chronic acidosis also leads to demineralization of the bone and increased calcium excretion [17,20]. Hypercalciuria, immobilization, anti-epileptic drugs, and fat malabsorption further precipitate urinary calcium. Moreover, the low urine pH seen in patients with a low-alkali diet contributes to uric acid crystals [73]. Obesity, insulin resistance, and an animal-protein diet are associated with low urine pH [80]. The uric acid stone may act as a nidus for calcium-based nephrolithiasis formation [73]. Furthermore, fluid intake restriction is traditionally applied to children receiving the ketogenic diet, making them susceptible to stone formation [73]. Potential benefits of urine alkalization with oral potassium citrate in children with a urine calcium to creatinine ratio of >0.20 mg/mg to prevent kidney stone formation is well reported [20,25,75,78]. Genetic polymorphisms in transporters, such as renal sodium citrate cotransporter, is a known risk factor in recurrent stone formers [81,82]. McNally et al. reported that the empiric use of oral citrate in children treated with a classic ketogenic diet led to a reduction in the incidence of kidney stones from 6.75% to 0.9% without an increase in adverse effects [67]. The international ketogenic diet study group agreed that oral citrates appear to prevent kidney stones; however, there was mixed opinion on its empiric use (class III) [9]. The consensus statement is unchanged since 2009 due to the lack of new evidence. Hence, we need a well-designed study to analyze the empiric use of urine alkalization therapy. A ketogenic diet is generally prescribed for weight loss in adults, who require a shorter duration of therapy; the empiric use of oral citrates may not be necessary. However, this remains to be elucidated by future studies. Purine-rich foods (red meat, fish, poultry, beer, and legumes) increase the uric acid load [80]. The digestion of animal protein produces a transient acidic environment, which results in a lower urine pH, promoting the precipitation of uric stones [80]. Since uric stones are the most common stones in patients receiving a ketogenic diet, switching from animal proteins to plant-based proteins results in lower uric acid excretion, but, sequentially, lower uric acid stone formation is unclear. Siener et al. reported that patients consuming a balanced diet of vegetables and animal proteins had higher urine pH and urine uric acid concentration than those on a typical western diet [83]. It is also recommended that patients with symptomatic hypercalcemia, hyperuricosuric calcium urolithiasis, and urate nephropathy should be prescribed a urate-lowering agent [80]. However, empiric use of xanthine oxidase inhibitors in patients on a ketogenic diet requires further investigation. Other measures to mitigate the risk of renal stones include liberalizing fluid intake and avoiding the initial fasting phase at the start of ketogenic diets [84,85]. Modification of the diet regimen to allow small, frequent meals might help decrease gastrointestinal side effects and avoid volume depletion [86]. Screening for underlying metabolic disorders should be considered before initiation of a ketogenic diet to help avoid substantial acidosis [87]. Considering the long-term risk of bone fractures and osteopenia, the 2018 international ketogenic diet group recommended periodic DEXA scan screening for evaluation of bone mineral density [9]. Epidemiological studies have shown a temporal relationship between idiopathic osteoporosis and kidney stones. In addition, changing dietary patterns, including the ketogenic diet, could possibly be an important environmental trigger in the association, as well [88]. Bone health should be monitored closely in patients on the ketogenic diet and more clinical trials are needed to further define the negative impacts on bone health [89]. Although prophylactic calcium and vitamin D is recommended in all people on the ketogenic diet for bone health [23,24], athletes with dermal calcium loss during exercise/sweating and obese subjects restricting dairy are at further risk of worsening bone health if not on adequate calcium supplements [7,89]. However, given the reported risk of nephrolithiasis from hypercalciuria, supplementation remains a challenge [20,25]. Periodic urine chemistry analyses to measure the calcium to creatinine ratio, calcium, citrate, and oxalate can help identify patients at risk for kidney stone formation, and timely referral to a nephrologist should be considered. Patients with a family history of nephrolithiasis should be screened before starting a ketogenic diet due to their higher risk for stone formation. In the era of precision medicine, further studies are needed to understand the use of genetic variants to further personalize management, even in the dietary therapy field [90]. Our study has the following limitations. First, the observational studies included in the analysis are susceptible to shortcomings inherent to the design. In addition, sources of heterogeneity could be due to differences in patient population and definitions of ketogenic diet as described in Table 2. Second, important risk factors, such as family history of nephrolithiasis, physical activity, exposure to sunlight, presence of ketone bodies in the blood or urine and environmental exposure, were not mentioned in the included studies. Third, recurrent kidney stones are not differentiated from the first episodes; recurrent kidney stones might be more common in children. Fourth, the glomerular filtration rate decline was not the primary outcome in most of the included studies. Fifth, the pooled sample size for adults is smaller than children. Lastly, data on the estimated incidence of kidney stones in elderly and CKD patients on ketogenic diets were limited.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the estimated incidence of kidney stones in patients on ketogenic diets is 5.6%, which is comparable among adults and children. Uric acid stones are the most prevalent kidney stones in patients treated with ketogenic diets, followed by calcium-based stones. These findings may impact the prevention and management of kidney stones in patients treated with ketogenic diets.
  79 in total

1.  The effect of the ketogenic diet on the developing skeleton.

Authors:  Peter J Simm; Jillian Bicknell-Royle; Jock Lawrie; Judy Nation; Kellie Draffin; Karen G Stewart; Fergus J Cameron; Ingrid E Scheffer; Mark T Mackay
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.045

2.  Inter-relationships among diet, obesity and hippocampal-dependent cognitive function.

Authors:  T L Davidson; S L Hargrave; S E Swithers; C H Sample; X Fu; K P Kinzig; W Zheng
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  History of the ketogenic diet.

Authors:  James W Wheless
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

5.  Efficacy and tolerability of olive oil-based ketogenic diet in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: A single center experience from Turkey.

Authors:  Orkide Guzel; Utku Uysal; Nur Arslan
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.140

6.  Efficacy of the ketogenic diet for infantile spasms.

Authors:  Eric H Kossoff; Paula L Pyzik; Jane R McGrogan; Eileen P G Vining; John M Freeman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  The ketogenic diet for super-refractory status epilepticus patients in intensive care units.

Authors:  Eu Gene Park; Jiwon Lee; Jeehun Lee
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  The ketogenic diet in infants--Advantages of early use.

Authors:  Anastasia Dressler; Petra Trimmel-Schwahofer; Eva Reithofer; Gudrun Gröppel; Angelika Mühlebner; Sharon Samueli; Viktoria Grabner; Klaus Abraham; Franz Benninger; Martha Feucht
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.045

9.  Optimal clinical management of children receiving the ketogenic diet: recommendations of the International Ketogenic Diet Study Group.

Authors:  Eric H Kossoff; Beth A Zupec-Kania; Per E Amark; Karen R Ballaban-Gil; A G Christina Bergqvist; Robyn Blackford; Jeffrey R Buchhalter; Roberto H Caraballo; J Helen Cross; Maria G Dahlin; Elizabeth J Donner; Joerg Klepper; Rana S Jehle; Heung Dong Kim; Y M Christiana Liu; Judy Nation; Douglas R Nordli; Heidi H Pfeifer; Jong M Rho; Carl E Stafstrom; Elizabeth A Thiele; Zahava Turner; Elaine C Wirrell; James W Wheless; Pierangelo Veggiotti; Eileen P G Vining
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  24-h uric acid excretion and the risk of kidney stones.

Authors:  G C Curhan; E N Taylor
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Scoping review of recent evidence on the management of pediatric urolithiasis: summary of meta-analyses, systematic reviews and relevant randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Michael E Chua; Jin Kyu Kim; Jessica M Ming; Keara N De Cotiis; Stephen S Yang; Mandy Rickard; Armando J Lorenzo; Joana Dos Santos
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.003

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.