| Literature DB >> 34069908 |
Geovana F G Silvestre1, Renally P Lucena2, Genil D Oliveira2, Helimarcos N Pereira3, Jhonatta A B Dias3, Ivone A Souza3, Harley S Alves1,2.
Abstract
This work aimed to carry out a study of Apodanthera congestiflora by investigating its chemical composition and pharmacological potential. From the dichloromethane phase (Dic-Ac) of the A. congestiflora stems, three compounds were identified: cayaponoside C5b (Ac-1), cabenoside C (Ac-2) and fevicordin C2 glucoside (Ac-3), being last identified for the first time as a natural product. These compounds were obtained by chromatographic methods and their structures were elucidated by means of spectroscopic analysis of IR, MS and NMR. In the quantification of Dic-Ac, it was possible to observe the presence of 7% of cayaponoside C5b. Dic-Ac showed significant toxicity for in vivo tests, with macroscopic and biochemical changes. The anti-inflammatory activity of Dic-Ac was investigated using the paw edema model. A decrease in inflammatory signs was observed in the first 5 h and the most effective dose in reducing edema with was 7.5 mg kg-1 (66.6%). Anti-tumor activity of Dic-Ac was evaluated by Ehrlich's carcinoma model, which showed inhibition rate of 78.46% at 15 mg kg-1 dosage. The phytochemical investigation, together with the biological tests carried out in this study, demonstrated that A. congestiflora is a promising species in the search for therapeutics, since it contains substances with high pharmacological potential in its composition.Entities:
Keywords: Cucurbitaceae; Ehrlich’s carcinoma; acute toxicity; anti-inflammatory; norcucurbitacins
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069908 PMCID: PMC8157552 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Scheme 1Chromatographic process for obtaining of compounds Ac-1, Ac-2 and Ac-3 from dichloromethane phase (Dic-Ac).
1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (δ, Acetone-d6, 400 and 100 MHz) of cayaponoside C5b (Ac-1), cabenoside C (Ac-2) and fevicordin C2 glucoside (Ac-3).
| Cayaponoside C5b | Cabenoside C | Fevicordin C2 Glucoside | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nº |
|
|
| |||
| 1 | 112.8 | 6.60 (s) | 112.7 | 6.58 (s) | 112.8 | 6.58 (s) |
| 2 | 145.2 | 144.9 | 145.1 | |||
| 3 | 144.9 | 145.1 | 145.1 | |||
| 4 | 122.3 | 122.3 | 122.4 | |||
| 5 | 129.3 | 127.8 | 129.4 | |||
| 6 | 125.6 | 6.87 (d, 10) | 125.6 | 6.88 (d, 9.9) | 125.6 | 6.88 (d, 9.9) |
| 7 | 127.2 | 5.80 (dd, 6.2, 10) | 126.9 | 5.82 (dd, 6.2, 10) | 127.3 | 5.82 (dd, 6, 2, 10) |
| 8 | 47.4 | 2.56 (m) | 47.6 | 2.54 (m) | 47.5 | |
| 9 | 51.7 | 50.5 | 50.1 | |||
| 10 | 129.4 | 129.2 | 129.3 | |||
| 11 | 213.8 | 212.7 | 213.8 | |||
| 12 | 51.1 | 2.71 (d, 14.9) | 49.7 | 2.87 (m) | 50.9 | 2.87 (m) |
| 13 | 50.0 | 49.0 | 50.5 | |||
| 14 | 48.7 | 49.5 | 50.9 | |||
| 15 | 44.5 | 1.33 (sl) | 44.2 | 2.21 (sl) | 48.6 | 1.33 (sl) |
| 16 | 71.2 | 4.34 (t, 7.5) | 71.3 | 4.66 (m) | 71.4 | 4.48 (m) |
| 17 | 58.7 | 2.53 (m) | 67.7 | 3.07 (m) | 58.8 | 2.66 (d, 7.9) |
| 18 | 17.9 | 0.95 (s) | 19.7 | 0.95 (s) | 20.0 | 0.95 (s) |
| 19 | 26.7 | 1.20 (s) | 26.5 | 1.38 (s) | 29.8 | 1.20 (s) |
| 20 | 79.8 | 208.6 | 79.9 | |||
| 21 | 25.2 | 1.38 (s) | 31.7 | 2.13 (s) | 26.0 | 1.37 (s) |
| 22 | 215.6 | 203.6 | ||||
| 23 | 32.1 CH2 | 2.86 (m) | 120.6 CH | 6.81 (d, 15.4) | ||
| 24 | 37.9 CH2 | 1.69 (t, 7.9) | 155.3 CH | 6.94 (d, 15.3) | ||
| 25 | 79.9 | 69.7 | ||||
| 26 | 29.4 | 1.13 (s) | 30.4 | 1.26 (s) | ||
| 27 | 29.4 | 1.12 (s) | 29.7 | 1.27 (s) | ||
| 28 | 11.2 | 2.21 (s) | 11.2 | 2.22 (s) | 11.2 | 2.22 (s) |
| 30 | 20.2 | 1.01 (s) | 17.8 | 1.01 (s) | 19.7 | 1.01 (s) |
| 1′ | 104.5 | 4.65 (d, 7.4) | 104.6 | 4.65 (d, 7.4) | 104.1 | 4.65 (d, 7.4) |
| 2′ | 74.3 | 3.59–3.40 (m) | 74.5 | 3.59–3.40 (m) | 74.6 | 3.59–3.40 (m) |
| 3′ | 77.2 | 3.59–3.40 (m) | 77.2 | 3.59–3.40 (m) | 77.2 | 3.59–3.40 (m) |
| 4′ | 70.7 | 3.59–3.40 (m) | 70.6 | 3.59–3.40 (m) | 70.3 | 3.59–3.40 (m) |
| 5′ | 77.7 | 3.39 (m) | 77.7 | 3.39 (m) | 77.7 | 3.39 (m) |
| 6′ | 62.0 | 3.92 (dd, 2.8 and 12) | 62.3 | 3.92 (dd, 2.8 and 12) | 62.3 | 3.92 (dd, 2.8 and 12) |
Figure 1Chemical structures of cayaponoside C5b (Ac-1), cabenoside C (Ac-2) and fevicordin C2 glucoside (Ac-3).
Weight evolution and water/feed consumption of the control and treated groups with Dic-Ac in the acute toxicity experiment (2000 mg kg−1).
| Group | Weight (g) | Water Consumption by Animal (mL) | Feed Consumption by Animal (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Final | |||
| Control | 28.2 ± 1.58 | 36.0 ± 1.01 | 9.97 ± 0.15 | 7.89 ± 0.25 |
| Treated with Dic-Ac | 26.3 ± 1.81 | 30.6 ± 1.47 * | 12.84 ± 0.87 * | 6.49 ± 0.98 |
* p < 0.05. Significant after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Bonferroni test with a 95% confidence interval, when compared to the control group.
Organs absolute mass of control and treated with Dic-Ac groups in the acute toxicity experiment (2000 mg kg−1).
| Group | Organ Index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lungs | Heart | Kidney | Liver | Spleen | |
| Control | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 1.66 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.07 |
| Treated with Dic-Ac | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.46 ± 0.01 | 2.47 ± 0.06 * | 0.24 ± 0.03 |
* p < 0.05. Significant after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Bonferroni test with a 95% confidence interval, when compared to the control group.
Biochemical and hematological parameters of the control and treated groups with the Dic-Ac in the acute toxicity experiment (2000 mg kg−1).
| Test | Control | Treated with Dic-Ac | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biochemical | Urea (mg dL−1) | 16.43 ± 2.03 | 18.1 ± 1.33 |
| Creatinine (mg dL−1) | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | |
| AST (U L−1) | 10.93 ± 4.30 | 12.42 ± 5.61 | |
| ALT (U L−1) | 16.57 ± 9.50 | 19.28 ± 8.65 | |
| Alkaline phosphatase (U L−1) | 26.42 ± 6.71 | 31.36 ± 8.24 | |
| Total protein (g dL−1) | 3.67 ± 1.12 | 4.63 ± 0.62 | |
| Albumin (g dL−1) | 1.44 ± 0.26 | 1.68 ± 0.11 | |
| Glucose (mg dL−1) | 69.00 ± 1.73 | 49.00 ± 2.33 * | |
| Total cholesterol (mg dL−1) | 149.70 ± 10.80 | 116.30 ± 3.28 * | |
| Triglycerides (mg dL−1) | 47.33 ± 7.48 | 43.67 ± 3.61 | |
| Total bilirubin (mg dL−1) | 0.62 ± 0.17 | 0.61± 0.12 | |
| Gamma-GT (mg dL−1) | 20.36 ± 4.29 | 19.37 ± 3.84 | |
| Hematological | Red blood cells count (mm3) | 5.29 ± 0.33 | 5,74 ± 0,41 |
| Hemoglobin concentration (g dL−1) | 15.14 ± 0.03 | 14,63 ± 0.05 | |
| Hematocrit (%) | 46.00 ± 1.31 | 44.00 ± 1.46 | |
| MCV (fL) | 45.53 ± 0.05 | 44.24 ± 0.07 | |
| MCH (pg) | 16.54 ± 0.07 | 15.39 ± 0.01 | |
| MCHC (%) | 35.67 ± 0.32 | 34.93 ± 0.28 | |
| Platelet count (mm3) | 162.08 ± 0.26 | 148.68 ± 0.21 | |
| White blood cells count (mm3) | 6.00 ± 0.48 | 4.50 ± 0.29 | |
| Segmented neutrophils (%) | 40 | 45 | |
| Eosinophils (%) | 01 | 04 | |
| Lymphocytes (%) | 57 | 50 | |
| Monocytes (%) | 02 | 01 |
MCV = mean corpuscular volume; HCV = mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. * p < 0.05. Significant after t test with a 95% confidence interval, when compared to the control group.
Figure 2Carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice from the control groups and treated with the Dic-Ac. Increased paw thickness after 1 h of evaluation (a), after 2 h of evaluation (b), after 3 h of evaluation (c), after 4 h of evaluation (d), after 5 h of evaluation (e). The results are expressed as mean ± SEM of three repetitions. *** p < 0.001. Significant after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Bonferroni test with a 95% confidence interval, when compared to the control group.
Inhibition of carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice from control groups and treated with the Dic-Ac.
| Group | Oral Dose | Inhibition (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 4 h | 5 h | ||
| Negative control | ||||||
| Dexamethasone | 10 mg kg−1 | 70.2 | 81.8 | 88.5 | 83.6 | 79.5 |
| Dic-Ac | 30 mg kg−1 | 37.5 | 48.4 | 49.7 | 51.2 | 64.3 |
| Dic-Ac | 15 mg kg−1 | 27.6 | 42.8 | 52.4 | 51.6 | 57.3 |
| Dic-Ac | 7.5 mg kg−1 | 58.7 | 66.6 | 62.7 | 61.3 | 60.9 |
Figure 3The effect of Dic-Ac phase in the unit weight of the tumors. Mice were treated with Dic- Ac (15 and 30 mg kg−1), vehicle (0.9% saline) and standard (cisplatin 2 mg kg−1) orally. Data are expressed as means ± SEM; n = 5 mice per group. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Significant after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey’s multiple comparison test with 95% confidence interval.
Inhibition of tumor growth in mice from control groups and treated with Dic-Ac 30 mg kg−1 and 15 mg kg−1.
| Group | Oral Dose |
Average |
Inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | 2.25 g | 0.00% | |
| Standard Cisplatin | 2.5 mg kg−1 | 1.15 g | 62.01% |
| Dic-Ac | 30 mg kg −1 | 0.78 g | 76.05% |
| Dic-Ac | 15 mg kg −1 | 0.70 g | 78.46% |