| Literature DB >> 34069731 |
Ariana Hudiță1, Ionuț Cristian Radu2, Cătălin Zaharia2, Andreea Cristina Ion2, Octav Ginghină3,4, Bianca Gălățeanu1, Luminița Măruțescu5, Florin Grama6, Aristidis Tsatsakis7, Leonid Gurevich8, Marieta Costache1.
Abstract
5-fluorouracil (5-FU) remains the gold standard of treatment for colorectal cancer, but its poor bioavailability and high systemic toxicity highlight the urgent need for the development of novel delivery strategies to increase the efficacy of 5-FU treatment. The present study is aimed to design and validate a PEGylated Silk Fibroin Nanocarrier (SF/PEG nanoparticles (NPs)) as an efficient 5-FU delivery system for potential intravenous administration. Using the human adenocarcinoma HT-29 cell line as an in vitro model for colorectal cancer, the cytotoxicity screening of the SF/PEG NPs showed that pristine nanocarriers were highly biocompatible, while the addition of 5-FU triggers a dramatic reduction in tumor cell viability, proliferation potential and mitochondrial integrity as well as a significant increase in nitric oxide production. Despite their high in vitro cytotoxicity, the 5-FU SF/PEG NPs were found hemocompatible as no impact on red blood cells hemolysis or the phagocytic activity of the granulocytes was observed. Exposure of HT-29 tumor cells and blood samples to 5-FU SF/PEG NPs augmented the tumor necrosis factor-α levels. Moreover, 5-FU SF/PEG NPs showed an impact on tumor cell migration and invasive potential as both of these processes were inhibited by the NP treatment.Entities:
Keywords: 5FU; colorectal cancer; cytotoxicity; drugs delivery systems; inflammation; migration and invasion; polymeric nanoparticles
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069731 PMCID: PMC8160811 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1SEM microphotographs of SF/PEG nanoparticles.
Figure 2Size distribution of SF/PEG pristine nanoparticles obtained by DLS.
Figure 35-fluorouracil release profile from SF/PEG NPs. Data shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4Human adenocarcinoma HT–29 cell viability after 24 h incubation with various concentrations (2–20 mg/mL) of 5-FU PEGylated SF NPs (**** p ≤ 0.0001 sample vs. untreated control; *** p ≤ 0.001 sample vs. untreated control). The red arrow indicates the 5-FU SF/PEG NPs concentration corresponding to the IC50.
Figure 5In vitro basic cytotoxicity screening of simple and 5-FU PEGylated SF NPs. The cytotoxicity of the pristine and 5-FU loaded SF/PEG NPs (12 mg/mL) was investigated after 24 h and 72 h of treatment in terms of: (A). Cell viability; (B). Mitochondrial integrity; (C). LDH release; (D). Cell viability and proliferation potential; (E). NO release (** p ≤ 0.01; **** p ≤ 0.0001). The fluorescence micrographs were obtained by after labelling HT–29 cells with Mitotracker and DAPI (B) or calceinAM and EthBr (D).
Figure 6HT–29 (A). cell migration and (B). invasion potential after 48 h of exposure to pristine and 5-FU loaded PEGylated SF NPs as revealed by transwell-based assays (*** p ≤ 0.001). Representative optical microscopy images of HT–29 Crystal Violet-stained cells are shown below each sample.
Figure 7TNF–α expression profile detected in (A). HT–29 cell cultures exposed for 24 h and 72 h to 12 mg/mL SF/PEG NPs ± 5-FU and (B). whole blood exposed for 6 h and 24 h to 12 mg/mL SF/PEG NPs ± 5-FU (* p ≤ 0.05; *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001).
Figure 8Hemocompatibility of SF/PEG NPs ± 5-FU as revealed by the blood hemolysis assay after incubation with 12 mg/mL SF/PEG NPs ± 5-FU (**** p ≤ 0.0001).
Figure 9SF/PEG NPs ± 5-FU NPs effect on phagocytic activity of granulocytes. Dot plots (A), histograms (B), and graphic representation of the mean values of rhodamine-positive granulocytes percentages (C) obtained in the presence of tested NPs compared to negative or E. coli stimulated controls.