| Literature DB >> 34069716 |
Goeun Choi1,2,3, Huiyan Piao1, N Sanoj Rejinold1, Seungjin Yu1,4, Ki-Yeok Kim5, Geun-Woo Jin5, Jin-Ho Choy1,6,7.
Abstract
COVID-19 has been affecting millions of individuals worldwide and, thus far, there is no accurate therapeutic strategy. This critical situation necessitates novel formulations for already existing, FDA approved, but poorly absorbable drug candidates, such as niclosamide (NIC), which is of great relevance. In this context, we have rationally designed NIC-loaded hydrotalcite composite nanohybrids, which were further coated with Tween 60 or hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), and characterized them in vitro. The optimized nanohybrids showed particle sizes <300 nm and were orally administrated to rats to determine whether they could retain an optimum plasma therapeutic concentration of NIC that would be effective for treating COVID-19. The pharmacokinetic (PK) results clearly indicated that hydrotalcite-based NIC formulations could be highly potential options for treating the ongoing pandemic and we are on our way to understanding the in vivo anti-viral efficacy sooner. It is worth mentioning that hydrotalcite-NIC nanohybrids maintained a therapeutic NIC level, even above the required IC50 value, after just a single administration in 8-12 h. In conclusion, we were very successfully able to develop a NIC oral formulation by immobilizing with hydrotalcite nanoparticles, which were further coated with Tween 60 or HPMC, in order to enhance their emulsification in the gastrointestinal tract.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; hydrotalcite; nanohybrid; niclosamide; oral formulation; pharmacokinetics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069716 PMCID: PMC8160721 DOI: 10.3390/ph14050486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Scheme 1Niclosamide greatly inhibits SARS-CoV-2 virus through three mechanisms, (i) inhibiting endocytosis through hACE2 (human angiotensin converting enzyme-2 receptor); (ii) blocking autophagy; and (iii) inhibiting viral replications.
Scheme 2Schematic diagram of (a) the preparation of designed NIC–DHT nanohybrid and (b) NIC–DHT coated with Tween 60 or HPMC through a physical adsorption reaction.
Figure 1Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) NIC, (b) HT, (c) DHT, and (d) NIC–DHT nanohybrids. (*; impurity, ▼; periclase (MgO)).
Figure 2Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of (a) intact NIC, (b) HT, (c) DHT, and (d) NIC–DHT nanohybrids.
Figure 3The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of HT, DHT, and NIC–DHT.
Results of N2 adsorption–desorption experiments.
| Samples | SBET (m2/g) a | Vp (cm3/g) b |
|---|---|---|
| HT | 9.05 | 0.061 |
| DHT | 62.18 | 0.099 |
| NIC–DHT | 6.85 | 0.035 |
a From the specific surface area evaluated by fitting with the BET equation. b Total pore volume evaluated from the amount of adsorption at P/P0 = 0.99.
Figure 4FE-SEM images of (a) intact NIC, (b) HT, (c) DHT, and (d) NIC–DHT nanohybrids.
Figure 5The particle size distribution by DLS: (a) HT, (b) DHT, and (c) NIC–DHT nanohybrids.
Figure 6Plasma NIC concentration–time profiles after a single oral administration of NIC–DHT/Tween 60 nanohybrid (50 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg) and NIC–DHT/HPMC (200 mg/kg) in rats (The data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation, n = 5).
PK parameters of NIC after a single oral administration of Yomesan®, NIC–DHT/Tween 60 and NIC–DHT/HPMC nanohybrid formulations in rats (** only the Yomesan® data shown here were reused from Reference [51] (This data shown here is reused under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which was our previous study related to NIC-MMT nanohybrids) (n = 5).
| Parameters | ** Yomesan®
| NIC–DHT/Tween 60 | NIC–DHT/Tween 60 (200 mg/kg) | NIC–DHT/HPMC (200 mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC(last)
| 1096.81 ± 359.28 | 1823.83 ± 305.26 | 6819.30 ± 2530.40 | 30,430.35 ± 10,921.98 |
| Cmax (ng /mL) | 155.27 ± 39.92 | 1350.37 ± 613.98 | 6316.60 ± 4270.00 | 18,928.63 ± 2934.34 |
| Tmax (h) | 4.00 ± 0.89 | 0.25 ± 0.00 | 0.25 ± 1.65 | 0.38 ± 0.14 |
| T1/2 (h) | 5.72 ± 6.09 | 3.19 ± 0.43 | 2.69 ± 1.46 | 6.75 ± 1.98 |
AUC = area under the plasma concentration–time curve; Cmax = maximum plasma concentration; Tmax = time required to reach Cmax; t1/2 = elimination half-life.