| Literature DB >> 34068455 |
Hui Zhang1,2,3,4, Guilin Chen1,3,4, Shiyou Lü5, Lin Zhang6, Mingquan Guo1,3,4.
Abstract
The environmental pollution, pesticide resistance, and other associated problems caused by traditional chemical pesticides with limited modes of action make it urgent to seek alternative environmentally-friendly pesticides from natural products. Tung meal, the byproduct of the detoxified Vernicia fordii (Hemsl.) seed, has been commonly used as an agricultural fertilizer and as a pesticide. However, its active insecticidal extracts and ingredients remain elusive. In the present study, the contact toxicities of tung meal extracts against the agricultural and forest pests like O. formosanus and P. xylostella were examined. Our results showed that ethyl acetate and petroleum ether extracts showed the strongest toxicity against O. formosanus and P. xylostella, respectively. In order to further explore the chemical profiles of the ethyl acetate and petroleum ether extracts, UPLC-Q/TOF-MS and GC-MS analyses have been performed, and 20 and 29 compounds were identified from EA and PE extracts, respectively. The present study, for the first time, verified the noteworthy insecticidal activities on the aforementioned agricultural and forest pesticides and revealed the potential active parts and chemical composition, which are conducive to further exploiting the potential of tung meal as a natural plant-derived insecticide for biological control of agricultural and forest pests.Entities:
Keywords: biological control; botanical pesticide; euphorbiaceae; insecticidal activities; plant extracts
Year: 2021 PMID: 34068455 PMCID: PMC8150873 DOI: 10.3390/insects12050425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Insecticidal activity of different tung meal extracts on O. formosanus and P. xylostella.
| Extracts | Survival Rate | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| DMSO | 97.50 ± 2.50 a | 97.92 ± 2.08 a |
| Control | 97.50 ± 4.33 a | 95.83 ± 4.17 a |
| CE | 47.5 ± 16.01 b | 75.00 ± 8.33 bcd |
| PE | 85 ± 8.66 a | 58.33 ± 8.33 d |
| DCM | 41.25 ± 20.73 bc | 85.42 ± 2.08 ab |
| EA | 23.75 ± 10.23 c | 75.00 ± 4.17 bcd |
| n-Bu | 56.25 ± 12.44 b | 60.42 ± 6.25 cd |
| H2O | 25 ± 9.35 c | 79.17 ± 4.17 abc |
The different letters (a–d) after the mean value represent significant differences at p < 0.05 level according to Duncan’s test.
Figure 1The base peak chromatogram (BPC) of EA extracts from tung meal.
Compounds tentatively identified from EA extracts of tung meal by UPLC-Q/TOF-MS.
| No. | tR
a | Components | Content b (%) | Formula | Measured Mass | MS1 | MS/MS | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.68 | (+)-7-Epi-sesamin-dicatechol/(±)-3,3′-Bisdemethylpinoresinol | 1.42 | C18H18O6 | 329.1025 | 329.1043 | 329, 299, 269, 165, 137, 109 | 5.47 |
| 2 | 0.82 | Trehalose | 0.46 | C12H22O11 | 387.1139 | 387.1168 | 341, 179, 161, 143 | 7.49 |
| 3 | 3.65 | 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde | 2.84 | C7H6O3 | 137.0239 | 137.0241 | 137, 119, 109, 108 | 1.46 |
| 4 | 8.55 | Unknown | 5.47 | - | - | 467.1955 | 467, 403, 343, 331, 313, 233, 203, 185 | - |
| 5 | 12.59 | (+)-7-Epi-sesamin-dicatechol/(±)-3,3′-Bisdemethylpinoresinol | 12.16 | C18H18O6 | 329.1025 | 329.1048 | 329, 269, 189, 165, 137, 109 | 6.99 |
| 6 | 13.84 | Isoamericanol B1 or related isomers (B2/C1/C2/(iso)princepin) | 0.54 | C27H26O9 | 493.1499 | 493.1513 | 493, 475, 463, 329, 327, 281, 165, 163 | 2.84 |
| 7 | 15.98 | Azelaic acid | 4.38 | C9H16O4 | 187.0979 | 187.0987 | 187, 169, 143, 125 | 4.28 |
| 8 | 17.06 | (iso)americanol A | 7.51 | C18H18O6 | 659.2129 | 659.2154 | 329, 311, 299, 165, 147, 135 | 3.79 |
| 9 | 17.53 | 5,7,4′-Tri- | 1.13 | C18H20O6 | 663.2442 | 663.2473 | 332, 331, 313, 301, 165, 147, 135 | 4.68 |
| 10 | 18.23 | Isoamericanol B1 or related isomers (B2/C1/C2/(iso)princepin) | 1.10 | C27H26O9 | 493.1499 | 493.1534 | 493, 463, 329, 327, 299, 269, 165, 163, 137 | 7.10 |
| 11 | 18.86 | (iso)americanol A | 2.63 | C18H18O6 | 659.2129 | 659.2176 | 329, 311, 299, 165, 147, 135 | 7.13 |
| 12 | 21.39 | Isoamericanin A | 0.93 | C18H16O6 | 327.0869 | 327.0890 | 327, 297, 165, 163, 147, 135 | 6.42 |
| 13 | 23.59 | Isoamericanol B1 or related isomers (B2/C1/C2/(iso)princepin) | 11.87 | C27H26O9 | 493.1499 | 493.1528 | 493, 475, 463, 329, 327, 165, 163, 137 | 5.88 |
| 14 | 25.14 | Isoamericanol B1 or related isomers (B2/C1/C2/(iso)princepin) | 8.67 | C27H26O9 | 493.1499 | 493.1509 | 493, 463, 329, 327, 165, 163 | 2.03 |
| 15 | 26.88 | Isoamericanol B1 or related isomers (B2/C1/C2/(iso)princepin) | 0.69 | C27H26O9 | 493.1499 | 493.1518 | 493, 329, 327, 165, 163 | 3.85 |
| 16 | 27.17 | Isoamericanol B1 or related isomers (B2/C1/C2/(iso)princepin) | 1.14 | C27H26O10 | 493.1499 | 493.1512 | 493, 477, 465, 329, 327, 299, 165, 163, 147, 135 | 2.64 |
| 17 | 31.28 | Isodiverniciasin A/diverniciasin B/diverniciasin C | 2.70 | C36H34O13 | 657.1972 | 657.2005 | 657, 493, 461, 329, 327, 165, 163 | 5.02 |
| 18 | 32.31 | Isodiverniciasin A/diverniciasin B/diverniciasin C | 2.25 | C36H34O13 | 657.1972 | 657.2018 | 657, 493, 461, 329, 327, 165, 163 | 7.00 |
| 19 | 33.40 | Isodiverniciasin A/diverniciasin B/diverniciasin C | 1.28 | C36H34O13 | 657.1972 | 657.1973 | 657, 493, 461, 329, 327, 166, 163 | 0.15 |
| 20 | 38.60 | (9S,10E,12Z,15Z)-9-Hydroperoxyoctadeca-10,12,15-Trienoic acid | 4.25 | C18H30O4 | 309.2066 | 309.2093 | 309, 291, 225, 209, 185 | 8.74 |
| 21 | 39.73 | Corchorifatty acid D | 0.84 | C18H28O4 | 307.1910 | 307.1930 | 307, 289, 265, 223, 185, 137 | 6.51 |
| 22 | 44.54 | Unknown | 10.25 | - | 339.2374 | - | 339, 183, 163, 147 | - |
a Retention time according to the base peak chromatogram in Figure 1. b The relative content (%) was obtained by integrating the chromatogram peaks in Figure 1.
Figure 2The fragmentation pathways based on the MS/MS spectra of isoamericanol A.
Figure 3The structures of compounds identified from EA extracts of tung meal by UPLC-Q/TOF-MS.
Figure 4The GC-MS chromatogram of PE extracts from tung meal.
Compounds estimated from PE extracts of tung meal by GC-MS.
| No. | tR
a | Content | Components b | Formula | SC c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.56 | 0.06 | Octanoic acid | C8H16O2 | 93 |
| 2 | 7.97 | 0.04 | 2,4-Decadienal | C10H16O | 91 |
| 3 | 13.61 | 0.11 | Caryophyllene | C15H24 | 99 |
| 4 | 14.42 | 0.14 | (-)- | C15H24 | 91 |
| 5 | 15.21 | 0.08 | C15H24 | 93 | |
| 6 | 17.62 | 0.07 | (-)-Spathulenol | C15H24O | 90 |
| 7 | 26.15 | 2.09 | Palmitic acid | C16H32O2 | 93 |
| 8 | 26.56 | 3.82 | Ethyl palmitate | C18H36O2 | 99 |
| 9 | 29.69 | 14.36 | Ethyl linolate | C20H36O2 | 99 |
| 10 | 29.83 | 6.34 | Ethyl oleate | C20H38O2 | 97 |
| 11 | 30.06 | 2.38 | Stearic acid | C18H36O2 | 99 |
| 12 | 30.33 | 3.09 | Ethyl stearate | C20H40O2 | 99 |
| 13 | 33.00 | 38.44 | Ethyl | C20H34O2 | 98 |
| 14 | 33.82 | 8.93 | Ethyl α-linolenate or Ethyl γ-linolenate | C20H34O2 | 98 |
| 15 | 34.99 | 0.7 | 2,2′-Methylenebis(4-methyl-6-tert-butylphenol) | C23H32O2 | 94 |
| 16 | 42.44 | 0.69 | 2-Linoleoylglycerol | C21H38O4 | 90 |
| 17 | 42.57 | 0.48 | 2-Monoolein | C21H40O4 | 97 |
| 18 | 42.78 | 0.31 | Heptacosane | C27H56 | 91 |
| 19 | 52.52 | 0.58 | C28H48O2 | 99 | |
| 20 | 53.04 | 0.25 | Stigmasta-3,5-diene | C29H48 | 95 |
| 21 | 54.75 | 0.18 | Vitamin E | C29H50O2 | 99 |
| 22 | 57.36 | 0.14 | Dotriacontane | C32H6O6 | 96 |
| 23 | 57.72 | 0.23 | Stigmasterol | C29H48O | 99 |
| 24 | 59.23 | 1.58 | C29H50O | 92 | |
| 25 | 59.74 | 0.73 | Tritriacontane | C33H68 | 99 |
| 26 | 60.52 | 0.09 | 4,22-stigmastadiene-3-one | C29H46O | 96 |
| 27 | 61.76 | 0.96 | Stigmast-4-en-3-one | C29H48O | 98 |
| 28 | 63.36 | 0.34 | Pentatriacontane | C35H72 | 97 |
| 29 | 64.53 | 0.36 | Stigmastane-3,6-dione | C29H48O2 | 91 |
a Retention time according to the GC-MS chromatogram in Figure 4. b The relative content (%) was obtained by integrating the chromatogram peaks in Figure 4. c Molecular weight; d Similarity score obtained by matching NIST 11.