| Literature DB >> 34068170 |
Tanvir S Sian1,2, Ushnah S U Din1, Colleen S Deane3,4, Ken Smith1, Amanda Gates1, Jonathan N Lund1,2, John P Williams1,2, Ricardo Rueda5, Suzette L Pereira6, Bethan E Phillips1, Philip J Atherton1.
Abstract
Ageing is associated with postprandial muscle vascular and metabolic dysfunction, suggesting vascular modifying interventions may be of benefit. Reflecting this, we investigated the impact of acute cocoa flavanol (450-500 mg) intake (versus placebo control) on vascular (via ultrasound) and glucose/insulin metabolic responses (via arterialised/venous blood samples and ELISA) to an oral nutritional supplement (ONS) in twelve healthy older adults (50% male, 72 ± 4 years), in a crossover design study. The cocoa condition displayed significant increases in m. vastus lateralis microvascular blood volume (MBV) in response to feeding at 180 and 240-min after ONS consumption (baseline: 1.00 vs. 180 min: 1.09 ± 0.03, p = 0.05; 240 min: 1.13 ± 0.04, p = 0.002), with MBV at these timepoints significantly higher than in the control condition (p < 0.05). In addition, there was a trend (p = 0.058) for MBV in m. tibialis anterior to increase in response to ONS in the cocoa condition only. Leg blood flow and vascular conductance increased, and vascular resistance decreased in response to ONS (p < 0.05), but these responses were not different between conditions (p > 0.05). Similarly, glucose uptake and insulin increased in response to ONS (p < 0.05) comparably between conditions (p > 0.05). Thus, acute cocoa flavanol supplementation can potentiate oral feeding-induced increases in MBV in older adults, but this improvement does not relay to muscle glucose uptake.Entities:
Keywords: ageing; blood flow; cocoa flavanols; glucose metabolism; skeletal muscle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34068170 PMCID: PMC8152976 DOI: 10.3390/nu13051646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Schematic representation of the study protocol for experimental study visits 1 and 2. Twelve healthy older adults were studied in a crossover design in the fasted state, and with and without cocoa flavanols in the fed state (via oral nutritional supplement). * indicates assessment was carried out during study visit 1 only, ^ indicates that the first blood draw occurred 15 min after mixed meal feeding. CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; ONS, oral nutritional supplement; US, ultrasound.
Volunteer characteristics (mean ± SD).
| Parameter | Volunteers ( |
|---|---|
| Gender (% M) | 50 |
| Age (years) | 72 ± 4 |
| Height (cm) | 170.7 ± 6.8 |
| Weight (kg) | 74.0 ± 13.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.3 ± 3.1 |
| Lean mass (kg) | 46.5 ± 8.4 |
| Resting heart rate (bpm) | 65 ± 8 |
| Resting systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 129 ± 10 |
| Resting diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 78 ± 8 |
| Grip strength (kg) * | 30.14 ± 7.79 |
| SPPB | 10 ± 1.1 |
BMI, body mass index; SPPB, short physical performance battery. * n = 11.
Figure 2Cocoa did not enhance oral nutritional supplement feeding-induced changes in leg blood flow (A), vascular conductance (B) or vascular resistance (C) of healthy older adults. ^ denotes significant within condition difference from control baseline (p < 0.05); * denotes significant within condition difference from cocoa baseline (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Cocoa enhanced oral nutritional supplement feeding-induced changes in microvascular blood volume (A) but not microvascular flow velocity (B) or microvascular blood flow (C) in the m. vastus lateralis and did not influence microvascular perfusion of the m. tibialis anterior (D–F) of healthy older adults. ~ denotes a significant difference between conditions (p < 0.05); * denotes significant within condition difference from cocoa baseline (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Changes in arterial glucose (A), venous glucose (B), glucose A-V balance (C), glucose uptake (D), insulin (E) and insulin AUC (F) in healthy older adults in response to cocoa or control, following oral nutritional supplement feeding. ~ denotes a significant difference between conditions (p < 0.05); ^ denotes significant difference from control baseline (p < 0.05); * denotes significant difference from cocoa baseline (p < 0.05). AUC, area under the curve; A-V, arterio-venous.